Williams Monique, Honan Cynthia, Skromanis Sarah, Sanderson Ben, Matthews Allison J
School of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 30, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
School of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250 Australia.
Curr Psychol. 2023 May 11:1-23. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04695-x.
This systematic review aimed to identify 1) the effect of mindfulness training on pre-post measures of anxiety and attention among adults experiencing high levels of generalised anxiety; and 2) the impact of predictors, mediators and moderators on post-intervention changes in anxiety or attention. Trait mindfulness and distress measures were included as secondary outcomes. A systematic search was conducted in November 2021 in electronic databases using relevant search terms. Eight articles comprising four independent studies were included ( = 334). All studies included participants diagnosed with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) who participated in an 8-week manualised program. The meta-analysis indicated that mindfulness training had a large effect on anxiety symptoms ( = -1.92, 95%[-3.44, -0.40]) when compared to inactive (i.e., care as usual, waitlist) or non-specified (i.e., condition not defined) controls. However, a significant effect was not found when compared to active controls. Effects for depression, worry and trait mindfulness did not reach statistical significance, despite small-large effect sizes favouring mindfulness compared to inactive/non-specified controls. Our narrative review found evidence that changes in aspects of trait mindfulness mediate anxiety reduction following mindfulness training. However, a small number of studies were available for inclusion in the review, with high risk of bias and low certainty of evidence present. Overall, the findings support the use of mindfulness training programs for GAD and indicate mechanisms that may differ from those involved in other cognitive therapy approaches. Further RCTs with evidence-based controls are needed to clarify techniques most beneficial for generalised anxiety to support individually tailored treatment.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-023-04695-x.
本系统评价旨在确定:1)正念训练对患有高度广泛性焦虑的成年人焦虑和注意力前后测量指标的影响;2)预测因素、中介因素和调节因素对干预后焦虑或注意力变化的影响。特质正念和痛苦测量指标作为次要结果纳入。2021年11月使用相关检索词在电子数据库中进行了系统检索。纳入了8篇文章,包括4项独立研究(n = 334)。所有研究均纳入了被诊断为广泛性焦虑症(GAD)且参加了为期8周的手册化项目的参与者。荟萃分析表明,与无干预(即常规护理、等候名单)或未明确规定的(即未定义的条件)对照相比,正念训练对焦虑症状有很大影响(g = -1.92,95%CI[-3.44,-0.40])。然而,与积极对照相比未发现显著影响。尽管与无干预/未明确规定的对照相比,支持正念的效应大小为小到中等,但抑郁、担忧和特质正念的效应未达到统计学显著性。我们的叙述性综述发现有证据表明,特质正念方面的变化介导了正念训练后焦虑的减轻。然而,纳入综述的研究数量较少,存在高偏倚风险和低证据确定性。总体而言,研究结果支持将正念训练项目用于广泛性焦虑症,并表明其机制可能与其他认知治疗方法不同。需要进一步开展具有循证对照的随机对照试验,以明确对广泛性焦虑最有益的技术,以支持个体化治疗。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s12144-023-04695-x获取的补充材料。