Yılmazer Eda, Hamamci Zeynep, Türk Fulya
Department of Psychology, Beykoz University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Department of Psychology, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 24;15:1401467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1401467. eCollection 2024.
This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on test anxiety across diverse age groups and intervention modalities.
Rigorous inclusion criteria were applied to select studies focusing on MBIs as the independent variable, with test anxiety as the outcome. A comprehensive search across multiple databases yielded 18 primary studies, contributing 20 comparisons. Data were extracted on study characteristics, sample sizes, and intervention details, and were analyzed using a random-effects model.
The analyses incorporated 1,275 participants, with MBIs demonstrating a moderate to large negative effect on test anxiety (effect size = -0.716; 95% CI: -1.383 to -0.049). Moderation analysis indicated that mean age, number of sessions, and intervention delivery mode did not significantly influence effect sizes. Publication bias assessment suggested the presence of bias via Egger's regression ( = 0.025), though Begg and Mazumdar's test and Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill method indicated no missing studies.
MBIs are effective in reducing test anxiety, though results should be interpreted with caution due to potential publication bias and unexplained heterogeneity. The impact of MBIs did not vary significantly with participant age, number of sessions, or delivery mode.
本荟萃分析评估了基于正念的干预措施(MBIs)对不同年龄组和干预方式下考试焦虑的有效性。
应用严格的纳入标准来选择以MBIs作为自变量、考试焦虑作为结果的研究。对多个数据库进行全面检索后得到18项原始研究,产生了20组比较。提取了关于研究特征、样本量和干预细节的数据,并使用随机效应模型进行分析。
分析纳入了1275名参与者,MBIs对考试焦虑显示出中度到较大的负面影响(效应量 = -0.716;95%置信区间:-1.383至-0.049)。调节分析表明,平均年龄、疗程数和干预实施方式对效应量没有显著影响。发表偏倚评估表明,通过Egger回归存在偏倚( = 0.025),尽管Begg和Mazumdar检验以及Duval和Tweedie的修剪和填充方法表明没有缺失研究。
MBIs在降低考试焦虑方面是有效的,不过由于潜在的发表偏倚和无法解释的异质性,结果应谨慎解释。MBIs的影响在参与者年龄、疗程数或实施方式方面没有显著差异。