Türkdoğan Görgün Ceren, Koçak Şen İlknur, McLennan Jim
Department of Management and Organisation, Healthcare Management Program, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.
School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC Australia.
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2023 May 17:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s11069-023-06006-w.
The aim of this research was to investigate the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the 26-item Australian Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threat Scale (PPDTS). A cross-sectional study involving 530 university students and staff at Giresun University was conducted to establish the psychometric properties of the PPDTS. Content analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach alpha values for reliability were used to analyse the data. Content analysis showed that one item needed to be dropped as it was not related to environmental threats to Turkish communities. The exploratory factor analysis indicated that 66% of the total variance was explained by three factors: (i) knowledge and management of the external situational environment, (ii) management of one's emotional and psychological response, and (iii) management of one's social environment. The confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable overall goodness of fit for the three-factor model: CFI (0.908), RMSEA (0.074) for the 21 item scale. Cronbach's α coefficients of the subscales were 0.91, 0.93, and 0.83, respectively, while for the whole scale, it was 0.95. Four items from the original PPDTS were deleted in the course of the analyses. It was concluded that the Turkish version (PPDTS-T21) is a valid and reliable assessment tool for the evaluation of levels of psychological readiness for disaster threats to Turkish communities and will be useful in policy making for community preparedness for disaster events.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11069-023-06006-w.
本研究旨在调查26项澳大利亚灾害威胁心理准备量表(PPDTS)土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。对吉雷松大学的530名大学生和教职员工进行了一项横断面研究,以确定PPDTS的心理测量特性。采用内容分析、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析和可靠性的克朗巴哈α值对数据进行分析。内容分析表明,有一项与土耳其社区面临的环境威胁无关,需要删除。探索性因素分析表明,总方差的66%由三个因素解释:(i)外部情境环境的知识与管理,(ii)个人情绪和心理反应的管理,以及(iii)个人社会环境的管理。验证性因素分析表明,三因素模型的整体拟合优度可接受:21项量表的CFI(0.908),RMSEA(0.074)。分量表的克朗巴哈α系数分别为0.91、0.93和0.83,而整个量表的系数为0.95。在分析过程中删除了原始PPDTS中的四项。得出的结论是,土耳其语版本(PPDTS-T21)是评估土耳其社区对灾害威胁的心理准备水平的有效且可靠的评估工具,将有助于制定社区灾害事件准备政策。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11069-023-06006-w获取的补充材料。