• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双重威胁事件期间的家庭飓风撤离:劳拉飓风与新冠疫情

Household hurricane evacuation during a dual-threat event: Hurricane Laura and COVID-19.

作者信息

Greer Alex, Huntsman David, Wu Hao-Che, Murphy Haley, Clay Lauren

机构信息

Department of Emergency Management and Homeland Security University at Albany.

Outcome Engenuity, LLC.

出版信息

Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2023 Jun 19:103820. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103820.

DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2023.103820
PMID:37362610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10277861/
Abstract

This study explores household-level evacuation decision-making in response to Hurricane Laura, in a context where hurricane risk reduction measures contradicted COVID-19 risk reduction measures. Data were collected using a mail-based survey approach from households along the coast of Texas and Louisiana to explore drivers of and barriers to evacuation, including COVID-19 measures such as negative affect, risk perceptions, protective actions, and exposure. Testing for direct and indirect effects among the drivers of and barriers to evacuation, we find that many of our COVID-19 measures did not have a direct effect on evacuation but did have indirect effects through other factors. We also found evidence of both direct and indirect relationships with regards to more conventional drivers of evacuation found in the literature. We close with a discussion of the limitations and implications of this study.

摘要

本研究探讨了在飓风风险降低措施与新冠疫情风险降低措施相互矛盾的背景下,家庭层面针对劳拉飓风的疏散决策情况。通过基于邮件的调查方法,收集了得克萨斯州和路易斯安那州沿海家庭的数据,以探究疏散的驱动因素和障碍,包括诸如负面影响、风险认知、保护行动和暴露情况等新冠疫情相关措施。在对疏散的驱动因素和障碍之间的直接和间接影响进行测试时,我们发现许多新冠疫情相关措施对疏散没有直接影响,但通过其他因素产生了间接影响。我们还发现了与文献中更传统的疏散驱动因素相关的直接和间接关系的证据。最后,我们讨论了本研究的局限性和意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/54b15fbbfcae/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/433f5d2dafc0/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/297c36c7f30e/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/4df6de776a06/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/b955ca3cd5b9/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/a80b5957650d/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/9980fb68ef93/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/43eeac70d57c/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/54b15fbbfcae/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/433f5d2dafc0/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/297c36c7f30e/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/4df6de776a06/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/b955ca3cd5b9/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/a80b5957650d/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/9980fb68ef93/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/43eeac70d57c/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ad0/10277861/54b15fbbfcae/gr8_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Household hurricane evacuation during a dual-threat event: Hurricane Laura and COVID-19.双重威胁事件期间的家庭飓风撤离:劳拉飓风与新冠疫情
Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2023 Jun 19:103820. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103820.
2
Evacuate or social distance? Modeling the influence of threat perceptions on hurricane evacuation in a dual-threat environment.疏散还是保持社交距离?在双重威胁环境下,对威胁感知对飓风疏散影响的建模。
Risk Anal. 2024 Mar;44(3):724-737. doi: 10.1111/risa.14202. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
3
Factors Affecting Hurricane Evacuation Intentions.影响飓风疏散意愿的因素。
Risk Anal. 2015 Oct;35(10):1837-57. doi: 10.1111/risa.12407. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
4
Determinants of Hurricane Evacuation from a Large Representative Sample of the U.S. Gulf Coast.美国墨西哥湾沿岸大代表性样本中飓风疏散的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 3;16(21):4268. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214268.
5
Individual hurricane evacuation intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights for risk communication and emergency management policies.新冠疫情期间个人飓风疏散意图:对风险沟通和应急管理政策的启示
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2022;111(1):507-522. doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-05064-2. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
6
"You can't wash your hands in a house without running water": pandemic precautionary behaviors after Hurricane Laura.“在没有自来水的房子里你没法洗手”:劳拉飓风过后的疫情预防行为
Curr Psychol. 2023 May 3:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04677-z.
7
Disaster preparedness of dialysis patients for Hurricanes Gustav and Ike 2008.2008年透析患者针对古斯塔夫飓风和艾克飓风的灾难准备情况。
Adv Perit Dial. 2009;25:62-7.
8
Compound Risks of Hurricane Evacuation Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.美国新冠疫情期间飓风撤离的复合风险
Geohealth. 2020 Dec 1;4(12):e2020GH000319. doi: 10.1029/2020GH000319. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
Impacts of household vulnerability on hurricane logistics evacuation under COVID-19: The case of U.S. Hampton Roads.新冠疫情下家庭脆弱性对飓风后勤疏散的影响:以美国汉普顿锚地为例
Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2023 Aug;176:103179. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103179. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
10
A Policy Analysis of Preparedness for Hurricane Evacuations in the United States, 1990 to 2019: Implementation in Coastal States.美国 1990 年至 2019 年飓风疏散准备情况的政策分析:沿海州的实施情况。
Health Secur. 2022 Jan-Feb;20(1):65-73. doi: 10.1089/hs.2021.0125. Epub 2021 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Hurricanes and Health: A Scoping Review of Recent Developments in Physical Injuries, Mental Health, and Emergency Interventions.飓风与健康:对身体伤害、心理健康及应急干预近期进展的范围综述
Cureus. 2024 Jul 6;16(7):e63973. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63973. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual hurricane evacuation intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights for risk communication and emergency management policies.新冠疫情期间个人飓风疏散意图:对风险沟通和应急管理政策的启示
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2022;111(1):507-522. doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-05064-2. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
2
Dueling emergencies: Flood evacuation ridesharing during the COVID-19 pandemic.双重紧急情况:新冠疫情期间洪水撤离的拼车服务
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100352. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100352. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Compound Risks of Hurricane Evacuation Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.
美国新冠疫情期间飓风撤离的复合风险
Geohealth. 2020 Dec 1;4(12):e2020GH000319. doi: 10.1029/2020GH000319. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Evacuations as a Result of Hurricane Sandy: Analysis of the 2014 New Jersey Behavioral Risk Factor Survey.桑迪飓风导致的疏散:对2014年新泽西行为风险因素调查的分析
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017 Dec;11(6):720-728. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.21. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
5
Factors Affecting Hurricane Evacuation Intentions.影响飓风疏散意愿的因素。
Risk Anal. 2015 Oct;35(10):1837-57. doi: 10.1111/risa.12407. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence.保护行动决策模型:理论修正与额外证据。
Risk Anal. 2012 Apr;32(4):616-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
7
Empirical estimation of the conditional probability of natech events within the United States.美国内泰克事件条件概率的经验估计。
Risk Anal. 2011 Jun;31(6):951-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01561.x. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
8
Who evacuates when hurricanes approach? The role of risk, information, and location.飓风来袭时谁会撤离?风险、信息和地理位置的作用。
Soc Sci Q. 2010;91(3):816-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00721.x.
9
Individual actual or perceived property flood risk: did it predict evacuation from Hurricane Isabel in North Carolina, 2003?个人实际或感知的财产洪水风险:2003 年在北卡罗来纳州,它是否预测了人们从飓风伊莎贝尔撤离?
Risk Anal. 2010 Mar;30(3):501-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01341.x. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
10
Protection motivation theory and stages of change in sun protective behavior.保护动机理论与防晒行为的改变阶段
J Health Psychol. 2009 Mar;14(2):297-305. doi: 10.1177/1359105308100214.