• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向全球卫生研究中的公平伙伴关系:来自埃塞俄比亚、乌干达、老挝人民民主共和国和越南的经验。

Towards equitable partnerships in global health research: experiences from Ethiopia, Uganda, Lao PDR and Vietnam.

作者信息

Alemu Kassahun, Berhanu Della, Bergström Anna, Hoa Dinh Phuong, Swartling Peterson Stefan, Phoummalaysith Bounfeng, Tomson Goran, Wanyenze Rhoda Kitti, Persson Lars Åke

机构信息

University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jun 30;10(6):e019130. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019130.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019130
PMID:40588294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12211826/
Abstract

Equitable partnerships in global health research can counteract power imbalances in this field. Theoretical perspectives have been provided on equitable global health partnerships, but there are few reports from researchers actively engaged in such partnerships. This article departs from the experiences of four long-term global health research partnerships, two in Africa and two in Asia. It describes the challenges in enhancing an equitable research partnership and how these were addressed. The examples illustrate that funders can play a pivotal role in counteracting power imbalances by assigning leadership roles and directing primary funding to institutions where the research occurs. Such a transition requires adaptations and a new mindset on both sides. Embedded research capacity enhancement, part of all four partnership examples, is essential in correcting power imbalances. Capacity enhancement should preferably include enhancing the broader research ecosystem within the partner university, across academic institutions in the country or beyond. The development of mutual trust and respect takes time and requires long-term engagement, transparency in budgeting, project planning and all steps of the research process. Reciprocity in learning is important for all partners. It may include twinning of research students, joint degrees and efforts to bring research findings into policy and practice in all partner contexts. The partnership examples illustrate the achievements and challenges in bringing new research evidence into policy and practice, where early involvement and continuous buy-in by policymakers are crucial.

摘要

全球卫生研究中的公平伙伴关系可以抵消该领域的权力失衡。关于公平的全球卫生伙伴关系,已有理论观点,但积极参与此类伙伴关系的研究人员的报告却很少。本文基于四个长期全球卫生研究伙伴关系的经验展开,其中两个在非洲,两个在亚洲。它描述了加强公平研究伙伴关系所面临的挑战以及应对这些挑战的方式。这些例子表明,资助者可以通过分配领导角色并将主要资金导向开展研究的机构,在抵消权力失衡方面发挥关键作用。这种转变需要双方进行调整并形成新的思维方式。所有四个伙伴关系案例都包含的嵌入式研究能力提升,对于纠正权力失衡至关重要。能力提升最好包括加强伙伴大学内部、该国或其他地区学术机构之间更广泛的研究生态系统。相互信任和尊重的建立需要时间,并且需要长期参与、预算透明、项目规划以及研究过程的所有步骤都保持透明。相互学习对所有伙伴都很重要。这可能包括研究学生结对、联合学位以及在所有伙伴环境中将研究成果转化为政策和实践的努力。这些伙伴关系案例说明了将新的研究证据转化为政策和实践方面的成就与挑战,其中政策制定者的早期参与和持续支持至关重要。

相似文献

1
Towards equitable partnerships in global health research: experiences from Ethiopia, Uganda, Lao PDR and Vietnam.迈向全球卫生研究中的公平伙伴关系:来自埃塞俄比亚、乌干达、老挝人民民主共和国和越南的经验。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jun 30;10(6):e019130. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019130.
2
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
3
The ultimate power play in research - partnering with patients, partnering with power.研究中的终极权力博弈——与患者合作,与权力合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00745-9.
4
'You feel part of something bigger': Stakeholders' experiences of a long-term community-academic participatory research partnership.“你感觉自己是更宏大事物的一部分”:利益相关者对长期社区-学术参与式研究伙伴关系的体验
Autism. 2025 Jun 19:13623613251348485. doi: 10.1177/13623613251348485.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
7
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainable health-a call to action.可持续健康——行动呼吁。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 3;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s44263-023-00007-4.
2
Shifting power in global health will require leadership by the Global South and allyship by the Global North.全球卫生领域的权力转移将需要南方国家发挥领导力,北方国家提供盟友支持。
Lancet. 2024 Oct 24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02323-7.
3
Prepared for the polycrisis? The need for complexity science and systems thinking to address global and national evidence gaps.为多元危机做好准备?需要复杂性科学和系统思维来解决全球和国家的证据差距。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Sep 11;9(9):e014887. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014887.
4
Bridging research-policy gaps: An integrated approach.弥合研究与政策的差距:一种综合方法。
Environ Epidemiol. 2024 Jan 17;8(1):e281. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000281. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Mentorship as an overlooked dimension of research capacity strengthening: how to embed value-driven practices in global health.指导作为研究能力增强被忽视的维度:如何在全球健康中嵌入价值驱动实践。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jan 4;9(1):e014394. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014394.
6
Global Health Mentorship: Challenges and Opportunities for Equitable Partnership.全球健康指导:公平伙伴关系面临的挑战与机遇
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov;8(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013751.
7
Has Authorship in the Decolonizing Global Health Movement Been Colonized?去殖民化全球健康运动中的著作权是否被殖民化了?
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Jun 20;89(1):42. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4146. eCollection 2023.
8
Equitable partnerships in global health research.全球卫生研究中的公平伙伴关系。
Nat Food. 2020 Dec;1(12):760-761. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00201-9.
9
What constitutes equitable data sharing in global health research? A scoping review of the literature on low-income and middle-income country stakeholders' perspectives.在全球健康研究中,什么构成公平的数据共享?对低收入和中等收入国家利益相关者观点的文献进行的范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Mar;8(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010157.
10
Envisioning the futures of global health: three positive disruptions.展望全球健康的未来:三种积极的变革。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 15;401(10384):1247-1249. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00513-5. Epub 2023 Mar 16.