Capellier Gilles, Barrot Loic, Winizewski Hadrien
Réanimation Médicale, CHU Jean Minjoz, Besançon 25000, France.
Department of Health, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.
J Intensive Med. 2023 May 13;3(3):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.03.002.
Determining oxygenation targets in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a challenge. Although oxygenation targets have been used since ARDS was first described, they have not been investigated in detail. However, recent retrospective and prospective trials have evaluated the optimal oxygenation threshold in patients admitted to the general intensive care unit. In view of the lack of prospective data, clinicians continue to rely on data from the few available trials to identify the optimal oxygenation strategy. Assessment of the cost-benefit ratio of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) to the partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO) is an additional challenge. A high FiO has been found to be responsible for respiratory failure and deaths in numerous animal models. Low and high PaO values have also been demonstrated to be potential risk factors in experimental and clinical situations. The findings from this literature review suggest that PaO values ranging between 80 mmHg and 90 mmHg are acceptable in patients with ARDS. The costs of rescue maneuvers needed to reach these targets have been discussed. Several recent papers have highlighted the risk of disagreement between arterial oxygen saturation (SaO) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO) values. In order to avoid discrepancies and hidden hypoxemia, SpO readings need to be compared with those of SaO. Higher SpO values may be needed to achieve the recommended PaO and SaO values.
确定急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的氧合目标仍然是一项挑战。自首次描述ARDS以来,虽然一直在使用氧合目标,但尚未对其进行详细研究。然而,最近的回顾性和前瞻性试验评估了入住普通重症监护病房患者的最佳氧合阈值。鉴于缺乏前瞻性数据,临床医生继续依赖少数现有试验的数据来确定最佳氧合策略。评估吸入氧分数(FiO)与动脉血氧分压(PaO)的成本效益比是另一项挑战。在众多动物模型中,已发现高FiO会导致呼吸衰竭和死亡。在实验和临床情况下,低PaO值和高PaO值也已被证明是潜在的风险因素。这篇文献综述的结果表明,ARDS患者的PaO值在80 mmHg至90 mmHg之间是可以接受的。已讨论了达到这些目标所需的抢救措施的成本。最近的几篇论文强调了动脉血氧饱和度(SaO)和外周血氧饱和度(SpO)值之间存在差异的风险。为了避免差异和隐匿性低氧血症,需要将SpO读数与SaO读数进行比较。可能需要更高的SpO值才能达到推荐的PaO和SaO值。