Stahl Bernd Carsten, Antoniou Josephina, Bhalla Nitika, Brooks Laurence, Jansen Philip, Lindqvist Blerta, Kirichenko Alexey, Marchal Samuel, Rodrigues Rowena, Santiago Nicole, Warso Zuzanna, Wright David
School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Artif Intell Rev. 2023 Mar 24:1-33. doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10420-8.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is producing highly beneficial impacts in many domains, from transport to healthcare, from energy distribution to marketing, but it also raises concerns about undesirable ethical and social consequences. AI impact assessments (AI-IAs) are a way of identifying positive and negative impacts early on to safeguard AI's benefits and avoid its downsides. This article describes the first systematic review of these AI-IAs. Working with a population of 181 documents, the authors identified 38 actual AI-IAs and subjected them to a rigorous qualitative analysis with regard to their purpose, scope, organisational context, expected issues, timeframe, process and methods, transparency and challenges. The review demonstrates some convergence between AI-IAs. It also shows that the field is not yet at the point of full agreement on content, structure and implementation. The article suggests that AI-IAs are best understood as means to stimulate reflection and discussion concerning the social and ethical consequences of AI ecosystems. Based on the analysis of existing AI-IAs, the authors describe a baseline process of implementing AI-IAs that can be implemented by AI developers and vendors and that can be used as a critical yardstick by regulators and external observers to evaluate organisations' approaches to AI.
人工智能(AI)正在诸多领域产生极具益处的影响,从交通运输到医疗保健,从能源分配到市场营销,但它也引发了人们对不良伦理和社会后果的担忧。人工智能影响评估(AI-IAs)是一种尽早识别正面和负面影响的方式,以保障人工智能的益处并避免其弊端。本文介绍了对这些人工智能影响评估的首次系统综述。作者以181份文档为研究对象,识别出38项实际的人工智能影响评估,并就其目的、范围、组织背景、预期问题、时间框架、流程与方法、透明度及挑战进行了严格的定性分析。该综述表明人工智能影响评估之间存在一些趋同之处。它还表明,该领域在内容、结构和实施方面尚未达成完全一致。文章建议,最好将人工智能影响评估理解为激发对人工智能生态系统的社会和伦理后果进行反思与讨论的手段。基于对现有人工智能影响评估的分析,作者描述了一个实施人工智能影响评估的基线流程,该流程可供人工智能开发者和供应商实施,并可供监管机构和外部观察者用作评估各组织人工智能方法的关键标准。