• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能影响评估的系统综述。

A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments.

作者信息

Stahl Bernd Carsten, Antoniou Josephina, Bhalla Nitika, Brooks Laurence, Jansen Philip, Lindqvist Blerta, Kirichenko Alexey, Marchal Samuel, Rodrigues Rowena, Santiago Nicole, Warso Zuzanna, Wright David

机构信息

School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Artif Intell Rev. 2023 Mar 24:1-33. doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10420-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10462-023-10420-8
PMID:37362899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10037374/
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is producing highly beneficial impacts in many domains, from transport to healthcare, from energy distribution to marketing, but it also raises concerns about undesirable ethical and social consequences. AI impact assessments (AI-IAs) are a way of identifying positive and negative impacts early on to safeguard AI's benefits and avoid its downsides. This article describes the first systematic review of these AI-IAs. Working with a population of 181 documents, the authors identified 38 actual AI-IAs and subjected them to a rigorous qualitative analysis with regard to their purpose, scope, organisational context, expected issues, timeframe, process and methods, transparency and challenges. The review demonstrates some convergence between AI-IAs. It also shows that the field is not yet at the point of full agreement on content, structure and implementation. The article suggests that AI-IAs are best understood as means to stimulate reflection and discussion concerning the social and ethical consequences of AI ecosystems. Based on the analysis of existing AI-IAs, the authors describe a baseline process of implementing AI-IAs that can be implemented by AI developers and vendors and that can be used as a critical yardstick by regulators and external observers to evaluate organisations' approaches to AI.

摘要

人工智能(AI)正在诸多领域产生极具益处的影响,从交通运输到医疗保健,从能源分配到市场营销,但它也引发了人们对不良伦理和社会后果的担忧。人工智能影响评估(AI-IAs)是一种尽早识别正面和负面影响的方式,以保障人工智能的益处并避免其弊端。本文介绍了对这些人工智能影响评估的首次系统综述。作者以181份文档为研究对象,识别出38项实际的人工智能影响评估,并就其目的、范围、组织背景、预期问题、时间框架、流程与方法、透明度及挑战进行了严格的定性分析。该综述表明人工智能影响评估之间存在一些趋同之处。它还表明,该领域在内容、结构和实施方面尚未达成完全一致。文章建议,最好将人工智能影响评估理解为激发对人工智能生态系统的社会和伦理后果进行反思与讨论的手段。基于对现有人工智能影响评估的分析,作者描述了一个实施人工智能影响评估的基线流程,该流程可供人工智能开发者和供应商实施,并可供监管机构和外部观察者用作评估各组织人工智能方法的关键标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/e726dfe89bb2/10462_2023_10420_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/59298edae088/10462_2023_10420_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/9fc658b055d6/10462_2023_10420_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/68f819b962e5/10462_2023_10420_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/056b86560392/10462_2023_10420_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/a9ca1966cf79/10462_2023_10420_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/373242fe5cb9/10462_2023_10420_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/e726dfe89bb2/10462_2023_10420_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/59298edae088/10462_2023_10420_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/9fc658b055d6/10462_2023_10420_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/68f819b962e5/10462_2023_10420_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/056b86560392/10462_2023_10420_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/a9ca1966cf79/10462_2023_10420_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/373242fe5cb9/10462_2023_10420_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/448a/10037374/e726dfe89bb2/10462_2023_10420_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments.人工智能影响评估的系统综述。
Artif Intell Rev. 2023 Mar 24:1-33. doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10420-8.
2
Transparency of AI in Healthcare as a Multilayered System of Accountabilities: Between Legal Requirements and Technical Limitations.作为多层问责制系统的医疗保健领域人工智能的透明度:介于法律要求与技术限制之间
Front Artif Intell. 2022 May 30;5:879603. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.879603. eCollection 2022.
3
Unraveling the Ethical Enigma: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.解开伦理谜团:医疗保健领域的人工智能
Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43262. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43262. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
New and emerging technology for adult social care - the example of home sensors with artificial intelligence (AI) technology.成人社会关怀新技术——以具有人工智能 (AI) 技术的家庭传感器为例。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(9):1-64. doi: 10.3310/HRYW4281.
5
Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Healthcare: Progress, Pitfalls, and Promises.探索人工智能在精神卫生保健中的作用:进展、陷阱与前景。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 5;15(9):e44748. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44748. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare.人工智能的前景:人工智能在医疗保健领域的机遇与挑战综述。
Br Med Bull. 2021 Sep 10;139(1):4-15. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldab016.
7
Innovation in healthcare: leadership perceptions about the innovation characteristics of artificial intelligence-a qualitative interview study with healthcare leaders in Sweden.医疗保健领域的创新:医疗保健领导者对人工智能创新特征的看法——一项对瑞典医疗保健领导者的定性访谈研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jul 18;4(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00458-8.
8
SHIFTing artificial intelligence to be responsible in healthcare: A systematic review.将人工智能转向医疗保健领域的责任:系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114782. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114782. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
9
Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics.人工智能在研究伦理方面带来的具体挑战。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Jul 6;6:1149082. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1149082. eCollection 2023.
10
Are current clinical studies on artificial intelligence-based medical devices comprehensive enough to support a full health technology assessment? A systematic review.基于人工智能的医疗器械的当前临床研究是否足够全面,足以支持全面的健康技术评估?系统评价。
Artif Intell Med. 2023 Jun;140:102547. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102547. Epub 2023 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing AI adoption in developing country academia: A trust and privacy-augmented UTAUT framework.评估发展中国家学术界对人工智能的采用情况:一个信任与隐私增强的UTAUT框架。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 10;10(18):e37569. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37569. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
2
Artificial intelligence for response prediction and personalisation in radiation oncology.用于放射肿瘤学中反应预测和个性化的人工智能。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2025 Mar;201(3):266-273. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02281-z. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
3
Transfer learning for accurate fetal organ classification from ultrasound images: a potential tool for maternal healthcare providers.
从超声图像中进行准确的胎儿器官分类的迁移学习:孕产妇医疗保健提供者的潜在工具。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 20;13(1):17904. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44689-0.
4
Embedding responsibility in intelligent systems: from AI ethics to responsible AI ecosystems.将责任嵌入智能系统:从人工智能伦理到负责任的人工智能生态系统。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 18;13(1):7586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34622-w.