• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大流行病侵蚀减贫进程:对生产性生计的影响及贫困回归

Pandemics erode poverty alleviation process: Impact on productive livelihood and poverty return.

作者信息

Wang Bo, Shi Han, Wang Zhaohua, Xu Shuling, Deng Nana, Qiu Yueming Lucy, Zhang Bin

机构信息

School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.

Research Center for Sustainable Development & Intelligent Decision, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

iScience. 2023 Jun 19;26(10):107177. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107177.

DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2023.107177
PMID:37366395
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10278892/
Abstract

Pandemics such as COVID-19 threaten income growth by disrupting productive activities for households, especially those who have just escaped from poverty. We provide empirical evidence on how pandemic disproportionately threatens the rural productive livelihood based on 48 months of household production electricity consumption data. The results show that after COVID-19, the productive livelihood activities of 51.11% households who have just overcome poverty have returned to the level before poverty alleviation. Their productive livelihood activities dropped by 21.81% on average during the national COVID-19 epidemic and by 40.57% during the regional epidemic. The households with lower income, lower level of education and less labor force even suffer more. We estimate 3.74% decline in income owing to the decrease in productive activities, resulting in 5.41% of households potentially falling back into poverty. This study provides an important reference for countries being at risk of returning to poverty after pandemic.

摘要

像新冠疫情这样的大流行病,通过扰乱家庭的生产活动来威胁收入增长,尤其是那些刚刚摆脱贫困的家庭。基于48个月的家庭生产用电数据,我们提供了关于大流行病如何不成比例地威胁农村生产生计的实证证据。结果显示,新冠疫情之后,51.11%刚脱贫家庭的生产生计活动已恢复到脱贫前水平。在全国新冠疫情期间,他们的生产生计活动平均下降了21.81%,在地区疫情期间下降了40.57%。收入较低、教育水平较低且劳动力较少的家庭受影响更大。我们估计,由于生产活动减少,收入下降了3.74%,导致5.41%的家庭可能重新陷入贫困。本研究为那些在疫情后有返贫风险的国家提供了重要参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554b/10518484/aaf087aae03a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554b/10518484/2ba9d1fe46e2/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554b/10518484/45227d28856d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554b/10518484/d838e5eca2a4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554b/10518484/6f541a1393b4/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554b/10518484/aaf087aae03a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554b/10518484/2ba9d1fe46e2/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554b/10518484/45227d28856d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554b/10518484/d838e5eca2a4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554b/10518484/6f541a1393b4/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/554b/10518484/aaf087aae03a/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Pandemics erode poverty alleviation process: Impact on productive livelihood and poverty return.大流行病侵蚀减贫进程:对生产性生计的影响及贫困回归
iScience. 2023 Jun 19;26(10):107177. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107177.
2
The Impact of Rural Livelihood Diversification on Household Poverty: Evidence from Jimma Zone, Oromia National Regional State, Southwest Ethiopia.农村生计多样化对农户贫困的影响:来自埃塞俄比亚西南部奥罗米亚州吉姆马地区的证据。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2021 Dec 23;2021:3894610. doi: 10.1155/2021/3894610. eCollection 2021.
3
The effects of COVID-19 on livelihoods of rural households: South Wollo and Oromia Zones, Ethiopia.新冠疫情对埃塞俄比亚南沃洛和奥罗米亚地区农村家庭生计的影响
Heliyon. 2021 Dec;7(12):e08550. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08550. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
4
Targeted Poverty Alleviation and Households' Livelihood Strategy in a Relation-Based Society: Evidence from Northeast China.基于关系的社会中的精准扶贫与农户生计策略:来自中国东北地区的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1747. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041747.
5
Dynamic livelihood impacts of COVID-19 on different rural households in mountainous areas of China.新冠疫情对中国山区不同农村家庭动态生计的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 23;17(9):e0273816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273816. eCollection 2022.
6
Livelihood Resilience or Policy Attraction? Factors Determining Households' Willingness to Participate in Rural Tourism in Western China.生计韧性还是政策吸引?决定中国西部农户参与乡村旅游意愿的因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(12):7224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127224.
7
Impact of livelihood capital and rural site conditions on livelihood resilience of farm households: evidence from contiguous poverty-stricken areas in China.生计资本和农村区位条件对农户生计韧性的影响:来自中国连片特困地区的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(59):123808-123826. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30426-7. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
8
Livestock and livelihoods of smallholder cattle-owning households in Cambodia: the contribution of on-farm and off-farm activities to income and food security.柬埔寨小农户养牛家庭的牲畜与生计:农业和非农业活动对收入及粮食安全的贡献。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2018 Dec;50(8):1747-1761. doi: 10.1007/s11250-018-1615-6. Epub 2018 May 23.
9
Livelihood Cycle and Vulnerability of Rural Households to Climate Change and Hazards in Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村家庭的生计周期及其对气候变化和灾害的脆弱性
Environ Manage. 2017 May;59(5):777-791. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0826-3. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
10
Effects of rabbit production on income and livelihood of rural households in Nigeria.兔子养殖对尼日利亚农村家庭收入和生计的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 24;9(8):e18568. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18568. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global GDP growth.新冠疫情对全球国内生产总值增长的影响。
J Jpn Int Econ. 2023 Jun;68:101258. doi: 10.1016/j.jjie.2023.101258. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
2
Vulnerabilities and risk perceptions of contracting COVID-19 among Nepali migrant workers.尼泊尔农民工感染新冠病毒的脆弱性与风险认知
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2023;7(1):100486. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100486. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
Relative deprivation, inequality and the Covid-19 pandemic.相对剥夺、不平等与新冠疫情。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 May;324:115858. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115858. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
4
Effect of Financial Literacy on Poverty Reduction Across Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda.金融知识对肯尼亚、坦桑尼亚和乌干达减贫的影响。
Glob Soc Welf. 2023;10(1):93-103. doi: 10.1007/s40609-022-00259-2. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
5
The discrepancies in the impacts of COVID-19 lockdowns on electricity consumption in China: Is the short-term pain worth it?新冠疫情封锁措施对中国电力消费影响的差异:短期阵痛是否值得?
Energy Econ. 2022 Oct;114:106318. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106318. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
6
Differences and Influencing Factors of Relative Poverty of Urban and Rural Residents in China Based on the Survey of 31 Provinces and Cities.基于对 31 个省、市的调查,中国城乡居民相对贫困的差异及影响因素研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 25;19(15):9015. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159015.
7
The distributional impact of recessions: The global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic recession.衰退的分配影响:全球金融危机与新冠疫情衰退
J Econ Bus. 2021 May-Jun;115:105971. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2020.105971. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
8
Assessment of COVID-19 impacts on U.S. counties using the immediate impact model of local agricultural production (IMLAP).使用地方农业生产即时影响模型(IMLAP)评估新冠疫情对美国各县的影响。
Agric Syst. 2021 May;190:103132. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103132. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
9
Impact of lockdown due to COVID-19 on nutrition and food security of the selected low-income households in Bangladesh.新冠疫情封锁措施对孟加拉国部分低收入家庭营养与粮食安全的影响。
Heliyon. 2022 May;8(5):e09368. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09368. Epub 2022 May 6.
10
COVID-19's impacts on incomes and food consumption in urban and rural areas are surprisingly similar: Evidence from five African countries.新冠疫情对非洲五个国家城乡地区收入和食品消费的影响惊人地相似
Glob Food Sec. 2022 Jun;33:100633. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100633. Epub 2022 Mar 30.