• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陷入困境的中美科学家:担忧情绪蔓延

Caught in the crossfire: Fears of Chinese-American scientists.

机构信息

Paul and Marcia Wythes Center on Contemporary China, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 4;120(27):e2216248120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216248120. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2216248120
PMID:37368928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10318999/
Abstract

The US global leadership in science and technology has greatly benefitted from immigrants from other countries, most notably from China in the recent decades. However, feeling the pressure of potential federal investigations since the 2018 launch of the China Initiative, scientists of Chinese descent in the United States now face higher incentives to leave the United States and lower incentives to apply for federal grants. Analyzing data pertaining to institutional affiliations of more than 200 million scientific papers, we find a steady increase in the return migration of scientists of Chinese descent from the United States to China. We also conducted a survey of scientists of Chinese descent employed by US universities in tenured or tenure-track positions (n = 1,304), with results revealing general feelings of fear and anxiety that lead them to consider leaving the United States and/or stop applying for federal grants. If the situation is not corrected, American science will likely suffer the loss of scientific talent to China and other countries.

摘要

美国在科学技术方面的全球领导地位得益于来自其他国家的移民,尤其是近几十年来来自中国的移民。然而,自 2018 年“中国倡议”启动以来,潜在的联邦调查令华裔美国科学家感到压力增大,他们现在更倾向于离开美国,而不太愿意申请联邦拨款。通过分析与 2 亿多份科学论文所属机构有关的数据,我们发现从美国返回中国的华裔科学家的回国移民呈稳步增长。我们还对在美国大学担任终身教职或终身教职轨职位的华裔科学家进行了调查(n=1304),结果显示,普遍的恐惧和焦虑感使他们考虑离开美国和/或停止申请联邦拨款。如果这种情况得不到纠正,美国科学可能会失去人才,而这些人才可能会流向中国和其他国家。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/229a/10318999/24ab9efadc6d/pnas.2216248120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/229a/10318999/0e6088be6b29/pnas.2216248120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/229a/10318999/24ab9efadc6d/pnas.2216248120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/229a/10318999/0e6088be6b29/pnas.2216248120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/229a/10318999/24ab9efadc6d/pnas.2216248120fig02.jpg

相似文献

1
Caught in the crossfire: Fears of Chinese-American scientists.陷入困境的中美科学家:担忧情绪蔓延
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 4;120(27):e2216248120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216248120. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
2
The overseas background of Chinese returnee energy scientists.中国归国能源科学家的海外背景。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0290959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290959. eCollection 2023.
3
Tenure track in emergency medicine.急诊医学终身教职岗位。
Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Nov;30(5):622-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70080-5.
4
Academic Tenure: Perceptual Variations Among Tenured, Tenure-seeking and Non-tenure Faculty.学术终身教职:终身教职、寻求终身教职和非终身教职教师的感知差异。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;37(3):578-587. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
5
Race, ethnicity, and gender in academic obstetrics and gynecology: 12-year trends.学术妇产科中的种族、民族和性别:12 年趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Nov;2(4):100178. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100178. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
A 22-year analysis of the Society for Vascular Surgery Foundation Mentored Research Career Development Award in fostering vascular surgeon-scientists.一项对血管外科学会基金会指导研究职业发展奖的 22 年分析,旨在培养血管外科医生科学家。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):398-406.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.036. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
Scientists as spies?: .科学家当间谍?
Politics Life Sci. 2023 Apr;42(1):32-64. doi: 10.1017/pls.2022.13.
8
International publication trends and collaboration performance of China in healthcare science and services research.中国在医疗科学与服务研究方面的国际出版趋势及合作表现
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Jan 29;5:1. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0061-z. eCollection 2016.
9
The tenure track employment system in colleges and universities in China: a scoping review of the Chinese literature.中国高校的 tenure track 聘用制度:对中文文献的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 10;14:1271110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1271110. eCollection 2023.
10
Trends in American scientists' political donations and implications for trust in science.美国科学家政治捐款趋势及其对科学信任的影响。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):368. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01382-3. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
How China is vying to attract the world's top scientific talent.中国如何竞相吸引世界顶尖科学人才。
Nature. 2025 Jun;642(8068):556. doi: 10.1038/d41586-025-01750-4.
2
Presumed Competent: The Strategic Adaptation of Asian Americans in Education and the Labor Market.《假定具备能力:亚裔美国人在教育与劳动力市场中的战略适应》
Annu Rev Sociol. 2024 Aug;50:455-474. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-090523-051614. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
3
The impact of US-China tensions on US science: Evidence from the NIH investigations.中美紧张局势对美国科学的影响:来自 NIH 调查的证据。

本文引用的文献

1
Pall of suspicion.怀疑的阴霾。
Science. 2023 Mar 24;379(6638):1180-1184. doi: 10.1126/science.adh8852. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
2
Has China's Young Thousand Talents program been successful in recruiting and nurturing top-caliber scientists?
Science. 2023 Jan 6;379(6627):62-65. doi: 10.1126/science.abq1218. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
3
When the geopolitical threat of China stokes bias against Asian Americans.当中国的地缘政治威胁引发对亚裔美国人的偏见时。 不过需要说明的是,这种说法是不符合事实且带有偏见的错误观点。中国一直坚持走和平发展道路,致力于与世界各国和平共处、合作共赢,不存在所谓“地缘政治威胁”。我们应坚决反对任何形式的偏见和不实言论,维护公平、公正与和平的国际环境。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 7;121(19):e2301436121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301436121. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
4
Why the US border remains 'a place of terror' for Chinese researchers.为何美国边境对中国研究人员而言仍是“恐怖之地”。
Nature. 2024 Feb;626(8001):1149-1151. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-00546-2.
5
'This is exclusion': Florida law restricts hiring of researchers from seven countries.“这就是排斥”:佛罗里达州法律限制从七个国家招聘研究人员。
Nature. 2024 Feb 26. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-00554-2.
6
The high price of overzealously defending the US research enterprise against theft by China.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 28;120(48):e2314168120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2314168120. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 13;119(50):e2217950119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2217950119. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
4
The moral filter of patriotic prejudice: How Americans view Chinese in the COVID-19 era.爱国主义偏见的道德过滤:美国人在新冠疫情时代如何看待中国人。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 22;119(47):e2212183119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212183119. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
The number of researchers with dual US-China affiliations is falling.拥有中美双重学术背景的研究人员数量正在减少。
Nature. 2022 Jun;606(7913):235-236. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-01492-7.
6
Odds for winning NSF grants improve as competition eases.随着竞争的缓解,赢得 NSF 资助的几率会增加。
Science. 2022 May 13;376(6594):684. doi: 10.1126/science.adc9452. Epub 2022 May 12.
7
New name won't fix all flaws in China Initiative, critics worry.新名称不会解决“中国倡议”的所有缺陷,批评者担心。
Science. 2022 Mar 4;375(6584):945-946. doi: 10.1126/science.adb1759. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
8
Reckoning with Asian America.与亚裔美国人清算。
Science. 2021 Apr 2;372(6537):8. doi: 10.1126/science.abi6877. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
9
Why East Asians but not South Asians are underrepresented in leadership positions in the United States.为什么在美国的领导层中,东亚人而非南亚人代表性不足。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 3;117(9):4590-4600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918896117. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
10
China's rise as a major contributor to science and technology.中国在科技领域的崛起成为主要贡献者。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 1;111(26):9437-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407709111. Epub 2014 Jun 16.