• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者的心血管健康相关生活质量:一项比较 ESC HeartQoL 和 EORTC QLQ-C30 问卷的前瞻性研究。

Cardiovascular health-related quality of life in cancer: a prospective study comparing the ESC HeartQoL and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

机构信息

Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine CBF, Berlin, Germany.

Charité-University Medicine Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Sep;25(9):1635-1647. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2951. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1002/ejhf.2951
PMID:37369985
Abstract

AIMS

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is highly relevant in cancer and often assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30. Cardiovascular HRQoL in cancer can be measured with the ESC HeartQoL questionnaire. We compared these instruments and examined their prognostic value.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Summary scores for EORTC QLQ-C30 (0-100 points) and ESC HeartQoL (0-3 points) questionnaires were prospectively assessed in 290 patients with mostly advanced cancer (stage 3/4: 81%, 1-year mortality: 36%) and 50 healthy controls (similar age and sex). Additionally, physical function and activity assessments were performed. Both questionnaires demonstrated reduced HRQoL in patients with cancer versus controls (EORTC QLQ-C30: 67 ± 20 vs. 91 ± 11, p < 0.001; ESC HeartQoL: 1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 2.7 ± 0.4, p < 0.001). The instruments were strongly correlated with each other (summary scores [r = 0.76], physical [r = 0.81], and emotional subscales [r = 0.75, all p < 0.001]) and independently associated with all-cause mortality (best cut-offs: EORTC QLQ-C30 <82.69: hazard ratio [HR] 2.33, p = 0.004; ESC HeartQoL <1.50: HR 1.85, p = 0.004 - adjusted for sex, age, left ventricular ejection fraction, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], high-sensitivity troponin T, cancer stage/type), with no differences in the strength of the association by sex (p-interaction > 0.9). Combining both questionnaires identified three risk groups with highest mortality in patients below both cut-offs (vs. patients above both cut-offs: HR 3.60, p < 0.001). Patients with results below both cut-offs, showed higher NT-proBNP and reduced physical function and activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The EORTC QLQ-C30 and ESC HeartQoL - assessing cancer and cardiovascular HRQoL - are both associated with increased mortality in cancer patients, with even greater stratification by combing both. Reduced HRQoL scores were associated with elevated cardiovascular biomarkers and decreased functional status.

摘要

目的

健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)在癌症中非常重要,通常使用 EORTC QLQ-C30 进行评估。癌症的心血管 HRQoL 可以使用 ESC HeartQoL 问卷进行测量。我们比较了这些工具,并研究了它们的预后价值。

方法和结果

前瞻性评估了 290 名患有晚期癌症(3/4 期:81%,1 年死亡率:36%)和 50 名健康对照者的 EORTC QLQ-C30(0-100 分)和 ESC HeartQoL(0-3 分)问卷的综合评分。此外,还进行了身体功能和活动评估。与对照组相比,两种问卷均显示癌症患者的 HRQoL 降低(EORTC QLQ-C30:67±20 与 91±11,p<0.001;ESC HeartQoL:1.8±0.8 与 2.7±0.4,p<0.001)。这些工具彼此之间具有很强的相关性(综合评分[ r=0.76]、身体[ r=0.81]和情绪子量表[r=0.75,均 p<0.001]),并且与全因死亡率独立相关(最佳截断值:EORTC QLQ-C30<82.69:危险比[HR]2.33,p=0.004;ESC HeartQoL<1.50:HR1.85,p=0.004-调整性别、年龄、左心室射血分数、N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽[NT-proBNP]、高敏肌钙蛋白 T、癌症分期/类型),但性别之间的关联强度没有差异(p 交互作用>0.9)。同时使用两种问卷可确定三个死亡率最高的风险组,这些组的患者两种截断值均低于(与两种截断值均高于的患者相比:HR3.60,p<0.001)。两种截断值均低于的患者 NT-proBNP 较高,身体功能和活动能力降低。

结论

EORTC QLQ-C30 和 ESC HeartQoL-评估癌症和心血管 HRQoL-均与癌症患者的死亡率增加相关,通过结合这两种方法进行分层,其相关性更强。HRQoL 评分降低与心血管生物标志物升高和功能状态降低有关。

相似文献

1
Cardiovascular health-related quality of life in cancer: a prospective study comparing the ESC HeartQoL and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.癌症患者的心血管健康相关生活质量:一项比较 ESC HeartQoL 和 EORTC QLQ-C30 问卷的前瞻性研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Sep;25(9):1635-1647. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2951. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
2
Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma - clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30和QLQ-HCC18指数评分在肝细胞癌患者中的预后价值——健康相关生活质量数据的临床应用
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jan 4;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2995-5.
3
The EORTC QLQ-C30 Summary Score as Prognostic Factor for Survival of Patients with Cancer in the "Real-World": Results from the Population-Based PROFILES Registry.EORTC QLQ-C30 总评分作为“真实世界”中癌症患者生存预后因素:基于人群的 PROFILES 登记研究结果。
Oncologist. 2020 Apr;25(4):e722-e732. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0348. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Identifying health-related quality of life cut-off scores that indicate the need for supportive care in young adults with cancer.确定与健康相关的生活质量临界分数,以表明癌症青年患者需要支持性护理。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Sep;31(9):2717-2727. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03139-6. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
5
General population normative values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 by age, sex, and health condition for the French general population.一般人群 EORTC QLQ-C30 量表的常模值,按年龄、性别和健康状况分组,针对法国一般人群。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 May 2;8(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00719-7.
6
Association between Geriatric 8 frailty and health-related quality of life in older patients with cancer (PROGNOSIS-G8): a Danish single-centre, prospective cohort study.老年 8 项衰弱与癌症老年患者健康相关生活质量的关系(PROGNOSIS-G8):一项丹麦单中心前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024 Sep;5(9):100612. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00118-1. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
7
EORTC QLQ-C30 general population normative data for Italy by sex, age and health condition: an analysis of 1,036 individuals.EORTC QLQ-C30 普通人群意大利人群的性别、年龄和健康状况的常模数据:对 1036 个人的分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 24;22(1):1040. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13211-y.
8
Updated normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general Dutch population by age and sex: a cross-sectional panel research study.基于年龄和性别更新的 EORTC QLQ-C30 荷兰一般人群常模数据:一项横断面面板研究。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Sep;32(9):2477-2487. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03404-2. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
9
The validity of EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue scale in advanced cancer patients and cancer survivors.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C30疲劳量表在晚期癌症患者和癌症幸存者中的有效性。
Palliat Med. 2003 Dec;17(8):664-72. doi: 10.1191/0269216303pm841oa.
10
Does it matter how we evaluate HRQOL? Longitudinal comparison of the EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-OG25 and FACT-E.我们如何评估健康相关生活质量重要吗?欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)/卵巢癌特异性问卷(QLQ-OG25)与癌症治疗功能评价系统-卵巢癌量表(FACT-E)的纵向比较
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Aug;15(4):641-650. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00957-w. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of behavioral activation on depressive symptoms in colorectal cancer patients within a medical environment: the mediating role of physical activity.医疗环境中行为激活对结直肠癌患者抑郁症状的影响:身体活动的中介作用。
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Mar 15;15(3):1264-1279. doi: 10.62347/PNHN9442. eCollection 2025.
2
2024 update in heart failure.2024年心力衰竭治疗进展
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;12(1):8-42. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14857. Epub 2024 May 28.