Calvete Esther
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, 48007 Bilbao, Spain.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 11;11(12):1710. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121710.
Exposure to family violence (EFV) is proposed as a relevant antecedent of child-to-parent violence (CPV). However, both previous research and practitioner experience suggest that not all cases of CPV involve EFV. This study aimed to identify profiles of adolescents according to their degree of involvement in CPV and their EFV. A sample of 1647 adolescents (mean age = 14.30, = 1.21; 50.5% boys) completed measures of CPV, witnessing family violence, victimization by parents, permissive parenting, parental warmth, and several measures of cognitive and emotional characteristics. Latent profile analyses based on measures of CPV and family characteristics supported a four-profile solution. Profile 1 (82.2%) consisted of adolescents with very low scores on both CPV and exposure to family violence. Profile 2 (6.2%) was characterized by medium scores on psychological CPV and high EFV. Profile 3 (9.7%) was characterized by severe psychological CPV and very low EFV. Profile 4 (1.9%) included adolescents with the highest scores on CPV, including physical violence, and high EFV. These profiles were found to differ from each other according to several cognitive and emotional variables of the adolescents. Therefore, not all CPV profiles were associated with a history of EFV. The obtained profiles have implications for interventions.
接触家庭暴力(EFV)被认为是儿童对父母暴力(CPV)的一个相关先行因素。然而,先前的研究和从业者经验都表明,并非所有的CPV案例都涉及EFV。本研究旨在根据青少年参与CPV和EFV的程度来确定其特征。1647名青少年(平均年龄 = 14.30,标准差 = 1.21;50.5%为男孩)的样本完成了CPV、目睹家庭暴力、受父母侵害、宽松型养育方式、父母温暖程度以及一些认知和情感特征的测量。基于CPV和家庭特征测量的潜在特征分析支持了一个四特征解决方案。特征1(82.2%)由CPV和接触家庭暴力得分都非常低的青少年组成。特征2(6.2%)的特点是心理CPV得分中等且EFV得分高。特征3(9.7%)的特点是严重心理CPV且EFV得分非常低。特征4(1.9%)包括CPV得分最高(包括身体暴力)且EFV得分高的青少年。这些特征在青少年的几个认知和情感变量方面彼此不同。因此,并非所有的CPV特征都与EFV史相关。所获得的特征对干预措施具有启示意义。