Suppr超能文献

植物汉堡与肉汉堡相比的矿物质含量和可用性。

Content and Availability of Minerals in Plant-Based Burgers Compared with a Meat Burger.

机构信息

Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins-Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK.

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 01006 Vitoria, Spain.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2023 Jun 13;15(12):2732. doi: 10.3390/nu15122732.

Abstract

Increasing numbers of individuals follow plant-based diets. This has sparked interest in the nutritional evaluation of the meat substitute sector. Nutritional understanding of these products is vital as plant-based eating becomes more common. For example, animal products are rich sources of iron and zinc, and plant-based foods could be inadequate in these minerals. The main aim was to analyse the mineral composition and absorption from a range of plant-based meat-free burgers and compare them to a typical beef burger. Total and bioaccessible mineral contents of plant-based burgers and a beef burger were determined using microwave digestion and in vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion, respectively. Mineral bioavailability was analysed by in vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion of foods, followed by exposure of Caco-2 cells to the sample digests and assessment of mineral uptake. Mineral quantification for all samples was achieved using inductively coupled ICP-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The content of minerals varied significantly amongst the burgers. Significantly greater quantities of Fe and Zn were found in the beef burger compared to most meat substitutes. Bioaccessible Fe was significantly higher in the beef compared to most of the plant-based meat alternatives; however, bioavailable Fe of most plant-based burgers was comparable to beef ( > 0.05). Similarly, bioaccessible Zn was significantly ( < 0.001) higher from the beef burger. Moreover, beef was superior regarding bioavailable Zn ( ≤ 0.05-0.0001), with only the mycoprotein burger displaying comparable Zn bioavailability ( > 0.05). Beef is an excellent source of bioaccessible Fe and Zn compared to most plant-based substitutes; however, these plant-based substitutes were superior sources of Ca, Cu, Mg and Mn. The quantity of bioaccessible and absorbable Fe varies dramatically among the meat alternatives. Plant-based burgers have the potential to provide adequate quantities of iron and zinc to those consuming such burgers as part of a varied diet. Thus, guiding consumer choices will depend on the variety of the vegetable constituents and their iron nutritional quality in different burgers.

摘要

越来越多的人遵循植物性饮食。这引发了人们对肉类替代品行业营养评估的兴趣。随着植物性饮食变得越来越普遍,对这些产品的营养理解至关重要。例如,动物产品是铁和锌的丰富来源,而植物性食物在这些矿物质中可能不足。主要目的是分析一系列植物性无肉汉堡中的矿物质组成和吸收情况,并将其与典型的牛肉汉堡进行比较。使用微波消解和体外模拟胃肠道消化分别测定植物性汉堡和牛肉汉堡的总矿物质和生物可利用矿物质含量。通过体外模拟胃肠道消化食物,然后将样品消化液暴露于 Caco-2 细胞中,并评估矿物质摄取量,分析矿物质生物利用度。使用电感耦合等离子体 - 光学发射光谱法(ICP-OES)对所有样品进行矿物质定量。各汉堡中的矿物质含量差异显著。与大多数肉类替代品相比,牛肉汉堡中的铁和锌含量明显更高。与大多数植物性肉类替代品相比,牛肉中的生物可利用铁明显更高;然而,大多数植物性汉堡中的铁生物利用度与牛肉相当(>0.05)。同样,牛肉中的生物可利用锌明显更高(<0.001)。此外,牛肉在锌的生物可利用性方面具有优势(≤0.05-0.0001),只有真菌蛋白汉堡显示出可比的锌生物利用度(>0.05)。与大多数植物性替代品相比,牛肉是生物可利用铁和锌的极好来源;然而,这些植物性替代品是钙、铜、镁和锰的更好来源。在肉类替代品中,生物可利用和可吸收铁的量差异很大。植物性汉堡有可能为那些将其作为多样化饮食一部分的人提供足够的铁和锌。因此,指导消费者选择将取决于不同汉堡中蔬菜成分的多样性及其铁的营养质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d455/10303107/fcb25e50022f/nutrients-15-02732-g001a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验