• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如果建造它,他们会吃吗?消费者对植物性和培养肉汉堡的偏好。

If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Dr., Saskatoon, S7N 5A8, SK, Canada.

出版信息

Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:428-437. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030
PMID:29501683
Abstract

In a hypothetical choice experiment consumers were given the option of purchasing burgers that were made from beef, plant-based protein, or cultured meat. Willingness to purchase plant-based and cultured meat burgers is linked to age, sex, views of other food technologies, and attitudes towards the environment and agriculture. Although consumers were told that all burgers tasted the same, there was a marked preference for beef burgers. A mixed-logit model predicts that, if prices were equal, 65% of consumers would purchase the beef burger, 21% would purchase the plant-based burger, 11% would purchase the cultured meat burger, and 4% would make no purchase. Preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers are found to be highly, but not perfectly, correlated.

摘要

在一项假设性的选择实验中,消费者可以选择购买由牛肉、植物蛋白或培养肉制成的汉堡。购买植物性和培养肉汉堡的意愿与年龄、性别、对其他食品技术的看法以及对环境和农业的态度有关。尽管消费者被告知所有汉堡的味道都一样,但他们明显更喜欢牛肉汉堡。混合逻辑模型预测,如果价格相同,65%的消费者会购买牛肉汉堡,21%的消费者会购买植物性汉堡,11%的消费者会购买培养肉汉堡,4%的消费者不会购买。研究发现,消费者对植物性和培养肉汉堡的偏好高度相关,但并非完全相关。

相似文献

1
If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers.如果建造它,他们会吃吗?消费者对植物性和培养肉汉堡的偏好。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:428-437. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
2
Sensory, emotional, and appropriateness of plant- and meat-based burgers.植物基和肉类汉堡的感官、情感和适宜性。
J Food Sci. 2024 May;89(5):2974-2990. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17033. Epub 2024 May 6.
3
Content and Availability of Minerals in Plant-Based Burgers Compared with a Meat Burger.植物汉堡与肉汉堡相比的矿物质含量和可用性。
Nutrients. 2023 Jun 13;15(12):2732. doi: 10.3390/nu15122732.
4
Chinese consumers' valuation for prepared plant-based meat products: Does environmental information matter?中国消费者对预制植物基肉类产品的评价:环境信息重要吗?
J Food Sci. 2024 Sep;89(9):5823-5840. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17279. Epub 2024 Aug 4.
5
Would You Buy Plant-Based Beef Patties? A Survey on Product Attribute Preference and Willingness to Pay among Consumers in Liaoning Province, China.你会购买植物基牛肉饼吗?中国辽宁省消费者对产品属性偏好及支付意愿的调查。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 19;14(20):4393. doi: 10.3390/nu14204393.
6
Consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for beef based on color and price discounts.消费者基于牛肉颜色和价格折扣的支付意愿(WTP)。
Meat Sci. 2024 Nov;217:109597. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109597. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
7
Consumer evaluations of processed meat products reformulated to be healthier - A conjoint analysis study.消费者对经过改良以更健康的加工肉类产品的评价——一项联合分析研究。
Meat Sci. 2017 Sep;131:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.239. Epub 2017 May 1.
8
Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.物尽其用:消费者对不同牛肉切块的偏好。
Appetite. 2016 Jan 1;96:70-79. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
9
The effect of information content on acceptance of cultured meat in a tasting context.信息含量对品尝情境中培养肉接受度的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231176. eCollection 2020.
10
Comparing the sensory properties of commercially available animal and plant-based burgers.比较市售动物源和植物源汉堡的感官特性。
J Texture Stud. 2024 Jun;55(3):e12838. doi: 10.1111/jtxs.12838.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of the nutritional quality of plant-based and traditional meat products across European markets.欧洲市场上植物性和传统肉类产品营养品质的比较分析。
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 16;12:1603600. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1603600. eCollection 2025.
2
Pace of adoption of alternatives to animal-source foods is an important factor in reaching climate goals.采用动物源食品替代品的速度是实现气候目标的一个重要因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22643. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07866-x.
3
Consumer Perceptions and Purchase Behavior Towards Plant-Based Eggs: A Vignette Experiment.
消费者对植物性鸡蛋的认知与购买行为:一项情景实验
Foods. 2025 May 14;14(10):1742. doi: 10.3390/foods14101742.
4
Exploring Chinese Consumers' Perception and Potential Acceptance of Cell-Cultured Meat and Plant-Based Meat: A Focus Group Study and Content Analysis.探索中国消费者对细胞培养肉和植物基肉的认知及潜在接受度:一项焦点小组研究与内容分析
Foods. 2025 Apr 22;14(9):1446. doi: 10.3390/foods14091446.
5
The Perceptions of Turkish Consumers Regarding In Vitro Meat and the Relationship Between These Perceptions and Willingness to Try and Consume In Vitro Meat.土耳其消费者对体外培养肉的认知以及这些认知与尝试和消费体外培养肉意愿之间的关系。
Vet Med Sci. 2025 Mar;11(2):e70314. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70314.
6
Sustainable HEalthy Diet practices: a cross-sectional analysis of an adult Greek sample.可持续健康饮食实践:对希腊成年样本的横断面分析
Nutr J. 2025 Feb 26;24(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12937-025-01096-7.
7
The future of meat and dairy consumption in the UK: exploring different policy scenarios to meet net zero targets and improve population health.英国肉类和奶制品消费的未来:探索不同政策情景以实现净零目标并改善民众健康。
Glob Sustain. 2023 May 16:1-24. doi: 10.1017/sus.2023.9.
8
Attachment to Meat and Willingness Towards Cultured Alternatives Among Consumers: A Cross-Sectional Study in the UAE.消费者对肉类的偏好及对人造替代品的接受度:阿联酋的一项横断面研究
Nutrients. 2024 Dec 25;17(1):28. doi: 10.3390/nu17010028.
9
Plant Taxa as Raw Material in Plant-Based Meat Analogues (PBMAs)-A Patent Survey.植物类群作为植物性肉类替代品(PBMA)的原料——一项专利调查
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 26;16(23):4054. doi: 10.3390/nu16234054.
10
Substitution patterns and price response for plant-based meat alternatives.植物性肉类替代品的替代模式与价格反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Dec 10;121(50):e2319016121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319016121. Epub 2024 Dec 2.