• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大容量充填树脂与传统树脂:一项系统评价。

Bulk-Fill Resins versus Conventional Resins: An Umbrella Review.

作者信息

Silva Gonçalo, Marto Carlos Miguel, Amaro Inês, Coelho Ana, Sousa José, Ferreira Manuel Marques, Francisco Inês, Vale Francisco, Oliveiros Bárbara, Carrilho Eunice, Paula Anabela Baptista

机构信息

Institute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-354 Coimbra, Portugal.

Laboratory for Evidence-Based Sciences and Precision Dentistry (LACBE-MDP), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-354 Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Polymers (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;15(12):2613. doi: 10.3390/polym15122613.

DOI:10.3390/polym15122613
PMID:37376259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10301558/
Abstract

Currently, composite resins have become the material of choice for the restoration of posterior teeth. Although bulk-fill resins represent a tempting alternative due to their lower complexity and faster use, some dentists are reluctant to use this material. The objective is to compare the performance of bulk-fill resins and conventional resins in direct restorations of posterior teeth based on the literature. The databases that were used to carry out the research were PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and the WOS. This umbrella literature review complies with PRISMA standards and assesses the quality of studies using the AMSTAR 2 tool. With the application of the criteria of the AMSTAR 2 tool, the reviews were considered low to moderate. The overall meta-analysis, although without statistical significance, favours mostly the use of conventional resin, as it is about five times more likely to obtain a favourable result than bulk-fill resin. Bulk-fill resins result in a simplification of the clinical process of posterior direct restorations, which is an advantage. The performance in terms of several properties of bulk-fill resins and conventional resins showed that they present similar behaviour.

摘要

目前,复合树脂已成为后牙修复的首选材料。尽管大块充填树脂因其操作复杂性较低且使用速度较快而成为一种诱人的替代品,但一些牙医仍不愿使用这种材料。目的是根据文献比较大块充填树脂和传统树脂在后牙直接修复中的性能。用于开展该研究的数据库有PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和WOS。这篇综合性文献综述符合PRISMA标准,并使用AMSTAR 2工具评估研究质量。根据AMSTAR 2工具的标准应用,这些综述被认为质量较低至中等。总体荟萃分析虽然没有统计学意义,但大多支持使用传统树脂,因为获得良好结果的可能性约是大块充填树脂的五倍。大块充填树脂简化了后牙直接修复的临床过程,这是一个优点。大块充填树脂和传统树脂在几种性能方面的表现表明它们具有相似的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0075/10301558/0bf526b1f58e/polymers-15-02613-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0075/10301558/e176c3b323c2/polymers-15-02613-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0075/10301558/dbb8898b1769/polymers-15-02613-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0075/10301558/0d72cc9f7260/polymers-15-02613-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0075/10301558/0bf526b1f58e/polymers-15-02613-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0075/10301558/e176c3b323c2/polymers-15-02613-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0075/10301558/dbb8898b1769/polymers-15-02613-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0075/10301558/0d72cc9f7260/polymers-15-02613-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0075/10301558/0bf526b1f58e/polymers-15-02613-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Bulk-Fill Resins versus Conventional Resins: An Umbrella Review.大容量充填树脂与传统树脂:一项系统评价。
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;15(12):2613. doi: 10.3390/polym15122613.
2
Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.后牙应用大体积充填和传统树脂复合材料修复的临床性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jan;23(1):221-233. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
3
Do bulk-fill resins decrease the restorative time in posterior teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.大容量充填树脂是否能减少后牙的修复时间?一项体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2019 Nov;10(4):e12463. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12463. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
4
Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.对磨牙牙尖运动和微渗漏评分的牙本质粘结系统及树脂基复合材料(常规型和大块充填型)修复体的修复方案的修改。
Dent Mater. 2018 Sep;34(9):1271-1277. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
Implications of resin-based composite (RBC) restoration on cuspal deflection and microleakage score in molar teeth: Placement protocol and restorative material.树脂基复合材料(RBC)修复对磨牙牙尖偏斜和微渗漏评分的影响:放置方案和修复材料
Dent Mater. 2017 Sep;33(9):e329-e335. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
6
Microleakage of Class II Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations Cured with Light-Emitting Diode versus Quartz Tungsten-Halogen Light: An In Vitro Study in Human Teeth.发光二极管与石英钨卤素灯固化的Ⅱ类大块充填树脂复合材料修复体的微渗漏:一项在人牙上的体外研究
Biomedicines. 2023 Feb 14;11(2):556. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020556.
7
Microleakage of Direct Restorations-Comparisonbetween Bulk-Fill and Traditional Composite Resins:Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接修复体的微渗漏——大块充填复合树脂与传统复合树脂的比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Dent. 2021 Oct;15(4):755-767. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1724155. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
Evaluation of microleakage and push-out bond strength of various composite resins for sealing the screw-access channel in implant-supported restorations.评价各种复合树脂用于密封种植体支持修复体螺丝通道的微渗漏和推出粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Oct;128(4):764.e1-764.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.07.008.
9
Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.树脂基直接后牙修复体与玻璃离子修复体的临床疗效——临床结局参数的最新荟萃分析
Dent Mater. 2022 May;38(5):e109-e135. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.018. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
10
Longevity of bulk fill and ormocer composites in permanent posterior teeth: Systematic review and meta-analysis.永久后牙中块状充填和有机硅增强复合树脂的寿命:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Dent. 2022 Apr;35(2):89-96.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of different resin composites for sealing the abutment screw-access hole on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate implant-supported restorations.不同树脂复合材料封闭基台螺丝通道孔对二硅酸锂种植体支持修复体疲劳行为的影响。
Odontology. 2025 Aug 24. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01179-1.
2
The Nanomechanical Performance and Water Uptake of a Flowable Short Fiber Composite: The Influence of Bulk and Layering Restorative Techniques.可流动短纤维复合材料的纳米力学性能与吸水性:整体修复技术和分层修复技术的影响
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Jun 2;17(11):1553. doi: 10.3390/polym17111553.
3
A prospective randomized clinical trial and an in vitro evaluation of the microtensile bond strength of a chlorhexidine-containing dentin bonding agent and a bulk fill composite material in primary teeth.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites: a systematic review.当代可流动大块充填树脂基复合材料:一项系统评价。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2023 Feb 22;10(1):8-19. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2023.2175685. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of polymerization shrinkage of a new bulk-fill flowable composite with other composites: An in vitro study.新型大块充填型流动复合树脂聚合收缩率与其他复合材料的比较:一项体外研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Dec;8(6):1605-1613. doi: 10.1002/cre2.656. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
3
Polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill and non-bulk-fill resin-based composites.
一项关于含氯己定的乳牙牙本质粘结剂与大块充填复合材料的微拉伸粘结强度的前瞻性随机临床试验及体外评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 13;25(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05960-0.
4
The Effect of Time Pressure on the Quality of Fillings and Arousal Levels of Dentists.时间压力对牙医补牙质量及唤醒水平的影响
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Feb;11(1):e70106. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70106.
5
Effect of polishing systems on the roughness, color, and staining of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites with and without S-PRG filler.抛光系统对含和不含S-PRG填料的传统和大块充填树脂复合材料的粗糙度、颜色和染色的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Feb 18;29(2):139. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06226-3.
6
Efficiency of bulk-fill versus conventional resin-based composite in class II restorations: A dental student perspective.Ⅱ类洞修复中大块充填树脂与传统树脂基复合材料的效率:牙科学生视角
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Oct;36(10):1364-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.08.004. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
7
Effect of duration and infection control barriers of light curing unit on hardness of Bulk Fill composite resin.光固化机的光照时间和感染控制屏障对块状充填复合树脂硬度的影响。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 26;12:e18021. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18021. eCollection 2024.
8
Comparative analysis of shear bond strength of MTA and Theracal PT with different restorative materials.不同修复材料对 MTA 和 Theracal PT 粘结强度的对比分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 22;24(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04763-z.
大块充填和非大块充填树脂基复合材料的聚合收缩和收缩应力
J Dent Sci. 2022 Jul;17(3):1212-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Longevity of bulk fill and ormocer composites in permanent posterior teeth: Systematic review and meta-analysis.永久后牙中块状充填和有机硅增强复合树脂的寿命:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Dent. 2022 Apr;35(2):89-96.
5
Effect of Light Curing Distance on Microhardness Profiles of Bulk-Fill Resin Composites.光固化距离对大块充填树脂复合材料显微硬度分布的影响。
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jan 28;14(3):528. doi: 10.3390/polym14030528.
6
The Use of Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composite in the Sealing of Cavity with Margins in Radicular Cementum.基于树脂的大块充填复合材料在根尖牙骨质边缘洞封闭中的应用。
Eur J Dent. 2022 Feb;16(1):1-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731834. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
7
Microleakage of Direct Restorations-Comparisonbetween Bulk-Fill and Traditional Composite Resins:Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接修复体的微渗漏——大块充填复合树脂与传统复合树脂的比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Dent. 2021 Oct;15(4):755-767. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1724155. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
Use of flowable resin composite as an intermediate layer in class II restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用流动性树脂复合材料作为 II 类修复体的中间层:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Oct;25(10):5629-5639. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04090-5. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
9
Minimal intervention in dentistry: which is the best approach for silorane composite restoration repairs?牙科微创干预:哪种方法最适合用于硅烷复合树脂修复体的修复?
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Apr 1;13(4):e357-e362. doi: 10.4317/jced.57640. eCollection 2021 Apr.
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.