Heckert Jessica, Martinez Elena M, Sanou Armande, Pedehombga Abdoulaye, Ganaba Rasmané, Gelli Aulo
Poverty, Gender, and Inclusion Unit, International Food Policy Research Institute, USA.
CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health, International Food Policy Research Institute, USA.
J Rural Stud. 2023 May;100:103026. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103026.
Understanding the types of food systems interventions that foster women's empowerment and the types of women that are able to benefit from different interventions is important for development policy. SELEVER was a gender- and nutrition-sensitive poultry production intervention implemented in western Burkina Faso from 2017 to 2020 that aimed to empower women. We evaluated SELEVER using a mixed-methods cluster-randomized controlled trial, which included survey data from 1763 households at baseline and endline and a sub-sample for two interim lean season surveys. We used the multidimensional project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI), which consists of 12 binary indicators, underlying count versions of 10 of these, an aggregate empowerment score (continuous) and a binary aggregate empowerment indicator, all for women and men. Women's and men's scores were compared to assess gender parity. We also assessed impacts on health and nutrition agency using the pro-WEAI health and nutrition module. We estimated program impact using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models and examined whether there were differential impacts by flock size or among those who participated in program activities (treatment on the treated). Program impacts on empowerment and gender parity were null, despite the program's multipronged and gender-sensitive approach. Meanwhile, results of the in-depth gender-focused qualitative work conducted near the project mid-point found there was greater awareness in the community of women's time burden and their economic contributions, but it did not seem that awareness led to increased empowerment of women. We reflect on possible explanations for the null findings. One notable explanation may be the lack of a productive asset transfer, which have previously been shown to be essential, but not sufficient, for the empowerment of women in agricultural development programs. We consider these findings in light of current debates on asset transfers. Unfortunately, null impacts on women's empowerment are not uncommon, and it is important to learn from such findings to strengthen future program design and delivery.
了解促进妇女赋权的粮食系统干预类型以及能够从不同干预措施中受益的妇女类型,对发展政策而言至关重要。SELEVER是一项于2017年至2020年在布基纳法索西部实施的对性别和营养敏感的家禽生产干预项目,旨在增强妇女权能。我们采用混合方法整群随机对照试验对SELEVER进行了评估,该试验包括基线和终期时来自1763户家庭的调查数据以及两个中期青黄不接季节调查的子样本。我们使用了多维项目层面的农业领域妇女赋权指数(pro-WEAI),该指数由12个二元指标、其中10个指标的基础计数版本、一个综合赋权得分(连续变量)以及一个二元综合赋权指标组成,所有这些指标均针对男性和女性。比较了男性和女性的得分以评估性别平等情况。我们还使用pro-WEAI健康和营养模块评估了对健康和营养机构的影响。我们使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)模型估计项目影响,并研究了鸡群规模或参与项目活动的人群(处理组)之间是否存在差异影响。尽管该项目采取了多管齐下且对性别敏感的方法,但项目对赋权和性别平等的影响为零。与此同时,在项目中期附近开展的深入的聚焦性别的定性研究结果发现,社区对妇女的时间负担及其经济贡献有了更高的认识,但这种认识似乎并未导致妇女赋权的增加。我们思考了这些零结果的可能解释。一个值得注意的解释可能是缺乏生产性资产转移,此前已表明这对农业发展项目中妇女的赋权至关重要,但并不充分。我们根据当前关于资产转移的辩论来考虑这些发现。不幸的是,对妇女赋权产生零影响的情况并不罕见,从这些发现中吸取教训以加强未来项目的设计和实施很重要。