• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字化乳腺断层合成中的病变检测:人体阅片实验表明,整合来自多个层面的信息并无益处。

Lesion detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: human reader experiments indicate no benefit from the integration of information from multiple planes.

作者信息

Balta Christiana, Reiser Ingrid, Broeders Mireille J M, Veldkamp Wouter J H, van Engen Ruben E, Sechopoulos Ioannis

机构信息

Dutch Expert Centre for Screening (LRCB), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Imaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Feb;10(Suppl 1):S11915. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11915. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11915
PMID:37378263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10292860/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), radiologists need to review a stack of 20 to 80 tomosynthesis images, depending upon breast size. This causes a significant increase in reading time. However, it is currently unknown whether there is a perceptual benefit to viewing a mass in the 3D tomosynthesis volume. To answer this question, this study investigated whether adjacent lesion-containing planes provide additional information that aids lesion detection for DBT-like and breast CT-like (bCT) images.

METHOD

Human reader detection performance was determined for low-contrast targets shown in a single tomosynthesis image at the center of the target (2D) or shown in the entire tomosynthesis image stack (3D). Using simulations, targets embedded in simulated breast backgrounds, and images were generated using a DBT-like (50 deg angular range) and a bCT-like (180 deg angular range) imaging geometry. Experiments were conducted with spherical and capsule-shaped targets. Eleven readers reviewed 1600 images in two-alternative forced-choice experiments. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and reading time were computed for the 2D and 3D reading modes for the DBT and bCT imaging geometries and for both target shapes.

RESULTS

Spherical lesion detection was higher in 2D mode than in 3D, for both DBT- and bCT-like images (DBT: , , ; bCT: , , ), but equivalent for capsule-shaped signals (DBT: , , ; bCT: , , ). Average reading time was up to 134% higher for 3D viewing ().

CONCLUSIONS

For the detection of low-contrast lesions, there is no inherent visual perception benefit to reviewing the entire DBT or bCT stack. The findings of this study could have implications for the development of 2D synthetic mammograms: a single synthesized 2D image designed to include all lesions present in the volume might allow readers to maintain detection performance at a significantly reduced reading time.

摘要

目的

在数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)中,放射科医生需要根据乳房大小查看20至80张断层合成图像的堆栈。这导致阅读时间显著增加。然而,目前尚不清楚在三维断层合成容积中查看肿块是否有感知上的益处。为了回答这个问题,本研究调查了相邻的含病变平面是否能提供有助于检测DBT类和乳腺CT类(bCT)图像中病变的额外信息。

方法

确定人类读者对在目标中心的单张断层合成图像中显示的低对比度目标(二维)或在整个断层合成图像堆栈中显示的低对比度目标(三维)的检测性能。使用模拟方法,将目标嵌入模拟乳房背景中,并使用DBT类(50度角范围)和bCT类(180度角范围)成像几何结构生成图像。对球形和胶囊形目标进行了实验。11名读者在二选一的强制选择实验中查看了1600张图像。计算了DBT和bCT成像几何结构以及两种目标形状在二维和三维阅读模式下的接收器操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积和阅读时间。

结果

对于DBT类和bCT类图像,二维模式下球形病变的检测率均高于三维模式(DBT:[具体数值1],[具体数值2],[具体数值3];bCT:[具体数值4],[具体数值5],[具体数值6]),但对于胶囊形信号,二者相当(DBT:[具体数值7],[具体数值8],[具体数值9];bCT:[具体数值10],[具体数值11],[具体数值12])。三维查看的平均阅读时间高出多达134%([具体数值13])。

结论

对于低对比度病变的检测,查看整个DBT或bCT堆栈并没有内在的视觉感知益处。本研究结果可能对二维合成乳腺X线摄影的发展有影响:一张设计为包含容积中所有病变的单一合成二维图像可能使读者在显著减少阅读时间的情况下保持检测性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/f7ad73b75cff/JMI-010-S11915-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/1235c57a4ed5/JMI-010-S11915-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/124fd16b6338/JMI-010-S11915-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/f36b9dcf51e6/JMI-010-S11915-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/e9db5d078a32/JMI-010-S11915-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/7a5260b936f1/JMI-010-S11915-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/6c52e3a8e78d/JMI-010-S11915-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/f7ad73b75cff/JMI-010-S11915-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/1235c57a4ed5/JMI-010-S11915-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/124fd16b6338/JMI-010-S11915-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/f36b9dcf51e6/JMI-010-S11915-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/e9db5d078a32/JMI-010-S11915-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/7a5260b936f1/JMI-010-S11915-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/6c52e3a8e78d/JMI-010-S11915-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/10292860/f7ad73b75cff/JMI-010-S11915-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Lesion detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: human reader experiments indicate no benefit from the integration of information from multiple planes.数字化乳腺断层合成中的病变检测:人体阅片实验表明,整合来自多个层面的信息并无益处。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Feb;10(Suppl 1):S11915. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11915. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
2
The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.TOMMY试验:英国国民医疗服务体系乳腺筛查项目中乳腺断层合成与数字乳腺摄影的比较——一项多中心回顾性阅片研究,比较数字乳腺断层合成和数字乳腺摄影与单纯数字乳腺摄影的诊断性能。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta19040.
3
4
Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.前瞻性奥斯陆断层合成筛查试验(OTST)中使用独立双读时数字乳腺断层合成的不一致和假阴性解读。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jun;34(6):3912-3923. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10400-0. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
5
Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test.使用混合性能测试对数字乳腺断层合成与二维数字乳腺摄影进行比较。
Phys Med Biol. 2015 May 21;60(10):3939-58. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/10/3939. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
6
Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.人工智能支持对乳腺断层合成图像解读的准确性和阅读时间的影响:一项多读者多病例研究。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Nov;31(11):8682-8691. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07992-w. Epub 2021 May 4.
7
Deep learning denoising of digital breast tomosynthesis: Observer performance study of the effect on detection of microcalcifications in breast phantom images.深度学习数字乳腺断层合成的去噪:对乳腺体模图像中微钙化检测效果的观察者性能研究。
Med Phys. 2023 Oct;50(10):6177-6189. doi: 10.1002/mp.16439. Epub 2023 May 5.
8
Developing breast lesion detection algorithms for digital breast tomosynthesis: Leveraging false positive findings.开发数字乳腺断层合成中的乳腺病变检测算法:利用假阳性发现。
Med Phys. 2022 Dec;49(12):7596-7608. doi: 10.1002/mp.15883. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
9
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.数字乳腺断层合成术与全视野数字乳腺摄影术:使用标本对病变测量和特征描述准确性的比较
Acta Radiol. 2014 Jul;55(6):661-7. doi: 10.1177/0284185113503636. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
10
The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.二维数字乳腺摄影和断层合成中的三维微钙化簇模拟。
Med Phys. 2011 Dec;38(12):6659-71. doi: 10.1118/1.3662868.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative observer effects in 2D and 3D localization tasks.二维和三维定位任务中的比较观察者效应。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 Jul;8(4):041206. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.4.041206. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Improving Accuracy and Efficiency with Concurrent Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.同时使用人工智能提高数字乳腺断层合成的准确性和效率。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2019 Jul 31;1(4):e180096. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2019180096.
3
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.国际乳腺癌筛查人工智能系统评估。
Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7788):89-94. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
4
What do we know about volumetric medical image interpretation?: a review of the basic science and medical image perception literatures.我们对容积医学图像解读了解多少?:基础科学与医学图像感知文献综述
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Jul 8;4(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0171-6.
5
Can Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Replace Full-Field Digital Mammography? A Multireader, Multicase Study of Wide-Angle Tomosynthesis.数字乳腺断层合成能否取代全视野数字乳腺摄影?广角断层合成的多读者、多病例研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Jun;212(6):1393-1399. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20294. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
6
Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.孤立人工智能在乳腺钼靶摄影中的乳腺癌检测:与 101 位放射科医生的比较。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 1;111(9):916-922. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy222.
7
One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.单视图乳腺断层合成摄影术与两视图乳腺 X 线摄影术在马尔默乳腺断层合成摄影术筛查试验(MBTST)中的比较:一项前瞻性、基于人群的、诊断准确性研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1493-1503. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30521-7. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
8
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.数字乳腺断层合成二维图像与全视野数字化乳腺摄影用于人群筛查的比较:来自维罗纳筛查项目的结果。
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):37-46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170745. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
9
Improving digital breast tomosynthesis reading time: A pilot multi-reader, multi-case study using concurrent Computer-Aided Detection (CAD).提高数字乳腺断层合成阅读时间:使用计算机辅助检测(CAD)的多读者、多病例先导研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Dec;97:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
10
Evidence on Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Versus Digital Mammography When Using Tomosynthesis (Three-dimensional Mammography) for Population Breast Cancer Screening.合成二维乳房 X 光摄影与数字乳房 X 光摄影在采用断层合成(三维乳房 X 光摄影)进行人群乳腺癌筛查时的比较。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(4):255-260.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 28.