Lolas F, Heerlein A
Psychopathology. 1986;19(3):93-100. doi: 10.1159/000284434.
Anxiety and hostility scores (Gottschalk-Gleser method of verbal content analysis) were studied in a mixed patient sample comprising psychosomatic, functional, and neurotic patients under two speech-eliciting conditions: monological and dialogical. Hostility scores did not differ between conditions. Mutilation, diffuse and total anxiety scores were significantly higher in interview than in monologue. In this condition, separation anxiety was expressed more often. Some intercorrelations between variables were found in both conditions, mostly involving hostility, while others hold either for monological or interview data. Factor analysis disclosed different factor structures for the two conditions. An interaction between speech-eliciting condition and diagnostic subgroup is suggested. The implications of these findings for descriptive psychiatric research are discussed.
采用戈特沙尔克 - 格莱泽言语内容分析法，在一个由心身疾病患者、功能性疾病患者和神经症患者组成的混合患者样本中，研究了在两种言语诱发条件下（即独白和对话）的焦虑和敌意得分。两种条件下的敌意得分没有差异。访谈中的自残、弥散性焦虑和总焦虑得分显著高于独白。在这种情况下，分离焦虑的表达更为频繁。在两种条件下都发现了变量之间的一些相互关系，大多涉及敌意，而其他一些关系则仅适用于独白或访谈数据。因子分析揭示了两种条件下不同的因子结构。提示言语诱发条件与诊断亚组之间存在相互作用。讨论了这些发现对描述性精神病学研究的意义。
