Suppr超能文献

两种低剂量复方口服避孕药的随机双盲试验。

A randomized double-blind trial of two low dose combined oral contraceptives.

作者信息

Bounds W, Vessey M, Wiggins P

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1979 Apr;86(4):325-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb11263.x.

Abstract

Fifty-five women using Loestrin-20 (20 microgram ethinyl oestradiol and 1 mg norethisterone acetate) as an oral contraceptive have been compared with a like number using Microgynon-30 (30 microgram ethinyl oestradiol and 150 microgram levonorgestrel) in a randomized, double-blind trial. Despite the small sample size, the main finding in the trial is clear-cut; Loestrin-20 provides poor cycle control and is thus less acceptable as an oral contraceptive than Microgynon-30. Although there is also a suggestion that Loestrin-20 may be less effective than Microgynon-30, the difference in the accidental pregnancy rates is not statistically significant.

摘要

在一项随机双盲试验中,将55名使用炔雌醇含量为20微克、醋酸炔诺酮含量为1毫克的炔雌醇醋酸炔诺酮片(Loestrin - 20)作为口服避孕药的女性与同等数量使用炔雌醇含量为30微克、左炔诺孕酮含量为150微克的复方炔诺酮片(Microgynon - 30)的女性进行了比较。尽管样本量较小,但该试验的主要发现很明确;炔雌醇醋酸炔诺酮片(Loestrin - 20)的周期控制效果较差,因此作为口服避孕药,其可接受性低于复方炔诺酮片(Microgynon - 30)。虽然也有迹象表明炔雌醇醋酸炔诺酮片(Loestrin - 20)的效果可能不如复方炔诺酮片(Microgynon - 30),但意外怀孕率的差异在统计学上并不显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验