• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

6 毫米后牙种植体单牙修复十年临床效果:一项随机对照临床试验

Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Clinic of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University Center of Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Dent Res. 2023 Aug;102(9):1015-1021. doi: 10.1177/00220345231170538. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1177/00220345231170538
PMID:37387401
Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of short dental implants (6-mm test group, TG) to longer implants (10-mm control group, CG) with single crown restorations after 10 y of loading. Patients requiring single-tooth replacement in the posterior jaws were randomly assigned to TG or CG. Implants were loaded with screw-retained single crowns after a healing period of 10 wk. Follow-up appointments were scheduled yearly and comprised patient-adapted oral hygiene reinstructions and polishing of all teeth and implants. After 10 y, clinical and radiographical parameters were assessed again. Out of initially 94 patients (47 in TG and CG, each), 70 (36 TG and 34 CG) could be reassessed. Survival rates accounted for 85.7% (TG) and 97.1% (CG), without significant intergroup difference ( = 0.072). All but 1 lost implant had been located in the lower jaw. These implants were not lost due to peri-implantitis but due to a late loss of osseointegration without signs of inflammation and with actually stable marginal bone levels (MBLs) over the investigation period. In general, MBLs were stable with medians (interquartile ranges) of 0.13 (0.78) mm and 0.08 (1.2) mm, for TG and CG, without significant intergroup differences. Crown-to-implant ratio showed a highly significant intergroup difference of 1.06 ± 0.18 mm and 0.73 ± 0.17 mm ( < 0.001). Few technical complications (i.e., screw loosening or chipping) were registered during the investigation period. In conclusion, given stringent professional maintenance, short dental implants with single-crown restorations show a slightly worse but statistically not different survival rate after 10 y, especially in the lower jaw, but can still be considered a valuable alternative, especially when vertical bone dimensions are limited (German Clinical Trials Registry: DRKS00006290).

摘要

本研究旨在比较短种植体(6 毫米试验组,TG)和长种植体(10 毫米对照组,CG)在 10 年负载后,用单冠修复的临床和影像学结果。需要在后颌单牙置换的患者被随机分配到 TG 或 CG。种植体在 10 周的愈合期后用螺丝固位的单冠加载。随访预约每年安排一次,包括患者适应的口腔卫生再指导以及所有牙齿和种植体的抛光。10 年后,再次评估临床和影像学参数。最初的 94 名患者(TG 和 CG 各 47 名)中,有 70 名(TG 36 名,CG 34 名)可以重新评估。存活率分别为 85.7%(TG)和 97.1%(CG),两组间无显著差异(=0.072)。除 1 个丢失的种植体外,所有种植体均位于下颌。这些种植体的丢失不是由于种植体周围炎,而是由于骨整合的晚期丢失,没有炎症迹象,实际上在整个研究期间边缘骨水平(MBL)稳定。总的来说,MBL 是稳定的,TG 的中位数(四分位距)为 0.13(0.78)mm,CG 的中位数为 0.08(1.2)mm,两组间无显著差异。冠-种植体比有显著的组间差异,分别为 1.06±0.18mm 和 0.73±0.17mm(<0.001)。在研究期间,仅记录到少数技术并发症(即螺丝松动或碎裂)。总之,在严格的专业维护下,用单冠修复的短种植体在 10 年后的存活率略差,但统计学上无差异,尤其是在下颌,但仍可被视为一种有价值的替代方法,尤其是在垂直骨尺寸有限时(德国临床试验注册中心:DRKS00006290)。

相似文献

1
Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.6 毫米后牙种植体单牙修复十年临床效果:一项随机对照临床试验
J Dent Res. 2023 Aug;102(9):1015-1021. doi: 10.1177/00220345231170538. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
2
Success of 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A 3-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.6毫米种植体单颗牙修复的成功率:一项为期3年的随机对照临床试验。
J Dent Res. 2016 Jun;95(6):623-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034516633432. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
3
Five-Year Survival of Short Single-Tooth Implants (6 mm): A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.短种植体(6 毫米)五年存活率:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Dent Res. 2018 Jul;97(8):887-892. doi: 10.1177/0022034518758036. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
[Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].[后牙单颗种植体支持修复体5年随访疗效的临床观察]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Oct 18;53(5):970-976. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.05.027.
5
Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm implants or by 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery: a 1-year randomised controlled trial.在吸收后的上颌后牙区使用6毫米种植体或11毫米种植体联合上颌窦底提升术支持的单冠修复:一项为期1年的随机对照试验。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Autumn;7(3):247-55.
6
Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up.固位型修复体支持的锁定锥度种植体的存活率和并发症发生率:一项 1 至 10 年随访的前瞻性研究。
J Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;23(6):434-44. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12152. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
7
Five-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns.五年随机对照临床试验比较黏固和螺丝固位氧化锆基种植体支持的单冠修复
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 May;33(5):537-547. doi: 10.1111/clr.13913. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
8
A prospective, multicentre study of 6-mm short implants in posterior alveolar bone supporting splinted crowns: A 5-year follow-up study.一项关于 6mm 短种植体在后牙牙槽骨支持覆盖义齿的前瞻性、多中心研究:5 年随访研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Jun;49(6):537-546. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13610. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
9
Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 10-year randomised controlled trial.骨水泥固定与螺丝固位种植体支持的单颗牙冠:一项10年的随机对照试验。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Winter;5(4):355-64.
10
Long-term follow-up of single crowns supported by short, moderately rough implants-A prospective 10-year cohort study.短而中度粗糙种植体支持的单冠的长期随访:一项前瞻性 10 年队列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Dec;29(12):1212-1219. doi: 10.1111/clr.13386. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of trends in the context of implant therapy in a university surgical specialty clinic: a 20-year retrospective study.大学外科专科诊所植入治疗背景下的趋势分析:一项20年的回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 23;29(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06033-2.
2
Alveolar ridge preservation in posterior maxillary teeth for reduction in the potential need for sinus floor elevation procedures: A pilot study.上颌后牙区牙槽嵴保存以减少鼻窦底提升手术潜在需求的初步研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Dec;35(12):1568-1584. doi: 10.1111/clr.14344. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
3
Survival Rates of Short Dental Implants (≤6 mm) Used as an Alternative to Longer (>6 mm) Implants for the Rehabilitation of Posterior Partial Edentulism: A Systematic Review of RCTs.
短种植体(≤6 mm)替代长种植体(>6 mm)用于后牙部分牙列缺损修复的生存率:随机对照试验的系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jun 17;12(6):185. doi: 10.3390/dj12060185.