Vanderhoof Melanie K, Alexander Laurie, Christensen Jay, Solvik Kylen, Nieuwlandt Peter, Sagehorn Mallory
U.S. Geological Survey, Geoscience and Environmental Change Science Center, PO Box 25046, MS 980, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA.
Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20460, USA.
Remote Sens Environ. 2023 Apr 1;288:1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113498.
Frequent observations of surface water at fine spatial scales will provide critical data to support the management of aquatic habitat, flood risk and water quality. Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellites can provide such observations, but algorithms are still needed that perform well across diverse climate and vegetation conditions. We developed surface inundation algorithms for Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2, respectively, at 12 sites across the conterminous United States (CONUS), covering a total of >536,000 km and representing diverse hydrologic and vegetation landscapes. Each scene in the 5-year (2017-2021) time series was classified into open water, vegetated water, and non-water at 20 m resolution using variables from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2, as well as variables derived from topographic and weather datasets. The Sentinel-1 algorithm was developed distinct from the Sentinel-2 model to explore if and where the two time series could potentially be integrated into a single high-frequency time series. Within each model, open water and vegetated water (vegetated palustrine, lacustrine, and riverine wetlands) classes were mapped. The models were validated using imagery from WorldView and PlanetScope. Classification accuracy for open water was high across the 5-year period, with an omission and commission error of only 3.1% and 0.9% for the Sentinel-1 algorithm and 3.1% and 0.5% for the Sentinel-2 algorithm, respectively. Vegetated water accuracy was lower, as expected given that the class represents mixed pixels. The Sentinel-2 algorithm showed higher accuracy (10.7% omission and 7.9% commission error) relative to the Sentinel-1 algorithm (28.4% omission and 16.0% commission error). Patterns over time in the proportion of area mapped as open or vegetated water by the Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 algorithms were charted and correlated for a subset of all 12 sites. Our results showed that the Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 algorithm open water time series can be integrated at all 12 sites to improve the temporal resolution, but sensor-specific differences, such as sensitivity to vegetation structure versus pixel color, complicate the data integration for mixed-pixel, vegetated water. The methods developed here provide inundation at 5-day (Sentinel-2 algorithm) and 12-day (Sentinel-1 algorithm) time steps to improve our understanding of the short- and long-term response of surface water to climate and land use drivers in different ecoregions.
在精细空间尺度上对地表水进行频繁观测,将为支持水生栖息地管理、洪水风险评估和水质管理提供关键数据。哨兵-1号和哨兵-2号卫星能够提供此类观测数据,但仍需要能在各种气候和植被条件下都表现良好的算法。我们分别针对哨兵-1号和哨兵-2号卫星,在美国本土(CONUS)的12个地点开发了地表淹没算法,覆盖总面积超过53.6万平方千米,代表了多样的水文和植被景观。利用哨兵-1号和哨兵-2号卫星的变量,以及从地形和气象数据集中导出的变量,将5年(2017 - 2021年)时间序列中的每个场景以20米分辨率分类为开阔水域、植被覆盖水域和非水域。哨兵-1号算法的开发与哨兵-2号模型不同,以探究这两个时间序列能否以及在何处可能整合为一个单一的高频时间序列。在每个模型中,绘制了开阔水域和植被覆盖水域(植被覆盖的滩涂、湖泊和河流湿地)类别。使用WorldView和PlanetScope的图像对模型进行了验证。在整个5年期间,开阔水域的分类精度很高,哨兵-1号算法的遗漏误差和错分误差分别仅为3.1%和0.9%,哨兵-2号算法分别为3.1%和0.5%。正如预期的那样,植被覆盖水域的精度较低,因为该类别代表混合像素。相对于哨兵-1号算法(遗漏误差28.4%,错分误差16.0%),哨兵-2号算法显示出更高的精度(遗漏误差10.7%,错分误差7.9%)。绘制了哨兵-1号和哨兵-2号算法将区域映射为开阔水域或植被覆盖水域的比例随时间的变化模式,并对所有12个地点的一个子集进行了相关性分析。我们的结果表明,哨兵-1号和哨兵-2号算法的开阔水域时间序列可以在所有12个地点进行整合,以提高时间分辨率,但特定传感器的差异,如对植被结构与像素颜色的敏感度不同,使混合像素的植被覆盖水域的数据整合变得复杂。这里开发的方法以5天(哨兵-2号算法)和12天(哨兵-1号算法)的时间步长提供淹没情况,以增进我们对不同生态区域地表水对气候和土地利用驱动因素的短期和长期响应的理解。