Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2321281. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21281.
There are reports of increasing incidence of pediatric diabetes since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the limitations of individual studies that examine this association, it is important to synthesize estimates of changes in incidence rates.
To compare the incidence rates of pediatric diabetes during and before the COVID-19 pandemic.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, the Cochrane database, Scopus, and Web of Science, and the gray literature were searched between January 1, 2020, and March 28, 2023, using subject headings and text word terms related to COVID-19, diabetes, and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).
Studies were independently assessed by 2 reviewers and included if they reported differences in incident diabetes cases during vs before the pandemic in youths younger than 19 years, had a minimum observation period of 12 months during and 12 months before the pandemic, and were published in English.
From records that underwent full-text review, 2 reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline was followed. Eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis and analyzed with a common and random-effects analysis. Studies not included in the meta-analysis were summarized descriptively.
The primary outcome was change in the incidence rate of pediatric diabetes during vs before the COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary outcome was change in the incidence rate of DKA among youths with new-onset diabetes during the pandemic.
Forty-two studies including 102 984 incident diabetes cases were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis of type 1 diabetes incidence rates included 17 studies of 38 149 youths and showed a higher incidence rate during the first year of the pandemic compared with the prepandemic period (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21). There was an increased incidence of diabetes during months 13 to 24 of the pandemic compared with the prepandemic period (IRR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.18-1.37). Ten studies (23.8%) reported incident type 2 diabetes cases in both periods. These studies did not report incidence rates, so results were not pooled. Fifteen studies (35.7%) reported DKA incidence and found a higher rate during the pandemic compared with before the pandemic (IRR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.17-1.36).
This study found that incidence rates of type 1 diabetes and DKA at diabetes onset in children and adolescents were higher after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic than before the pandemic. Increased resources and support may be needed for the growing number of children and adolescents with diabetes. Future studies are needed to assess whether this trend persists and may help elucidate possible underlying mechanisms to explain temporal changes.
自 COVID-19 大流行开始以来,有报道称儿科糖尿病的发病率有所增加。鉴于个别研究在检验这种关联时存在局限性,因此综合评估发病率变化的估计值非常重要。
比较 COVID-19 大流行期间和之前儿科糖尿病的发病率。
在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,于 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 28 日,通过主题词和与 COVID-19、糖尿病和糖尿病酮症酸中毒 (DKA) 相关的文本词,在电子数据库(包括 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 数据库、Scopus 和 Web of Science)和灰色文献中进行了检索。
如果研究报告了在 19 岁以下的年轻人中 COVID-19 大流行期间与大流行前相比新发糖尿病病例的差异,并且在大流行期间和大流行前有至少 12 个月的观察期,并且以英文发表,则研究被独立评估的 2 位评审员认为符合纳入标准。
从经过全文审查的记录中,2 位评审员独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。遵循观察性研究的荟萃分析中的偏倚评估 (MOOSE) 报告指南。将符合条件的研究纳入荟萃分析,并采用固定效应和随机效应分析进行分析。未纳入荟萃分析的研究则进行描述性总结。
主要结局是 COVID-19 大流行期间与之前相比,儿科糖尿病发病率的变化。次要结局是 COVID-19 大流行期间新发糖尿病青少年中 DKA 的发病率变化。
共纳入了 42 项研究,包含 102984 例新发糖尿病病例。17 项研究共纳入 38149 例青少年 1 型糖尿病发病率的荟萃分析显示,大流行第一年的发病率高于大流行前(发病率比 [IRR],1.14;95%CI,1.08-1.21)。与大流行前相比,大流行期间第 13 至 24 个月的糖尿病发病率更高(IRR,1.27;95%CI,1.18-1.37)。10 项研究(23.8%)报告了两个时期的 2 型糖尿病病例。这些研究没有报告发病率,因此无法进行汇总。15 项研究(35.7%)报告了 DKA 的发病率,发现大流行期间的发病率高于大流行前(IRR,1.26;95%CI,1.17-1.36)。
本研究发现,儿童和青少年糖尿病发病时 1 型糖尿病和 DKA 的发病率在 COVID-19 大流行开始后高于大流行前。可能需要为不断增加的儿童和青少年糖尿病患者提供更多资源和支持。需要进一步研究以评估这一趋势是否持续,并可能有助于阐明解释这种时间变化的潜在机制。