Shields Peter G
Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Addict Neurosci. 2023 Sep;7. doi: 10.1016/j.addicn.2023.100098. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
Tobacco research remains a clear priority to improve individual and population health, and has recently become more complex with emerging combustible and noncombustible tobacco products. The use of omics methods in prevention and cessation studies are intended to identify new biomarkers for risk, compared risks related to other products and never use, and compliance for cessation and reinitation. to assess the relative effects of tobacco products to each other. They are important for the prediction of reinitiation of tobacco use and relapse prevention. In the research setting, both technical and clinical validation is required, which presents a number of complexities in the omics methodologies from biospecimen collection and sample preparation to data collection and analysis. When the results identify differences in omics features, networks or pathways, it is unclear if the results are toxic effects, a healthy response to a toxic exposure or neither. The use of surrogate biospecimens (e.g., urine, blood, sputum or nasal) may or may not reflect target organs such as the lung or bladder. This review describes the approaches for the use of omics in tobacco research and provides examples of prior studies, along with the strengths and limitations of the various methods. To date, there is little consistency in results, likely due to small number of studies, limitations in study size, the variability in the analytic platforms and bioinformatic pipelines, differences in biospecimen collection and/or human subject study design. Given the demonstrated value for the use of omics in clinical medicine, it is anticipated that the use in tobacco research will be similarly productive.
烟草研究仍然是改善个人和群体健康的明确优先事项,并且随着新兴的可燃和不可燃烟草产品的出现,这一领域最近变得更加复杂。在预防和戒烟研究中使用组学方法旨在识别新的风险生物标志物,比较与其他产品相关的风险以及从不使用烟草的情况,以及评估戒烟和复吸的依从性,以评估烟草产品之间的相对影响。它们对于预测烟草使用的复吸和预防复发很重要。在研究环境中,技术和临床验证都必不可少,这在从生物样本采集、样本制备到数据收集和分析的组学方法中带来了许多复杂性。当结果识别出组学特征、网络或途径的差异时,尚不清楚这些结果是毒性作用、对有毒暴露的健康反应还是两者都不是。使用替代生物样本(如尿液、血液、痰液或鼻腔样本)可能反映也可能不反映诸如肺或膀胱等靶器官。本综述描述了在烟草研究中使用组学的方法,并提供了先前研究的示例,以及各种方法的优缺点。迄今为止,结果几乎没有一致性,这可能是由于研究数量少、研究规模有限、分析平台和生物信息学流程的变异性、生物样本采集的差异和/或人体研究设计的不同。鉴于组学在临床医学中的已证明价值,可以预期其在烟草研究中的应用也将同样富有成效。