Gajewski Patrick D, Golka Klaus, Hengstler Jan G, Kadhum Thura, Digutsch Jan, Genç Erhan, Wascher Edmund, Getzmann Stephan
Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo) at the Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Clinic for Psychosomatic Rehabilitation, Mittelrhein-Klinik, Boppard - Bad Salzig, Boppard, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 16;14:1134770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1134770. eCollection 2023.
INTRODUCTION: There is a large interindividual variability in cognitive functioning with increasing age due to biological and lifestyle factors. One of the most important lifestyle factors is the level of physical fitness (PF). The link between PF and brain activity is widely accepted but the specificity of cognitive functions affected by physical fitness across the adult lifespan is less understood. The present study aims to clarify whether PF is basically related to cognition and general intelligence in healthy adults, and whether higher levels of PF are associated with better performance in the same or different cognitive functions at different ages. METHODS: A sample of 490 participants (20-70 years) was analyzed to examine this relationship. Later, the sample was split half into the young to middle-aged group (YM; 20-45 years; = 254), and the middleaged to older group (MO; 46-70 years; = 236). PF was measured by a quotient of maximum power in a bicycle ergometry test PWC-130 divided by body weight (W/kg), which was supported by a self-reported level of PF. Cognitive performance was evaluated by standardized neuropsychological test batteries. RESULTS: Regression models showed a relationship between PF and general intelligence (-factor) and its subcomponents extracted using structural equation modeling (SEM) in the entire sample. This association was moderated by age, which also moderated some specific cognitive domains such as attention, logical reasoning, and interference processing. After splitting the sample into two age groups, a significant relationship was found between cognitive status, as assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and PF in both age groups. However, apart from cognitive failures in daily life (CFQ), no other association between PF and specific cognitive functions was found in the YM group. In contrast, several positive associations were observed in the MO group, such as with selective attention, verbal memory, working memory, logical reasoning, and interference processing. DISCUSSION: These findings show that middle-aged to older adults benefit more from PF than younger to middle-aged adults. The results are discussed in terms of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the cognitive effects of PF across the lifespan. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05155397, identifier NCT05155397.
引言:由于生物和生活方式因素,认知功能会随着年龄的增长而存在很大的个体差异。最重要的生活方式因素之一是体能水平(PF)。体能与大脑活动之间的联系已被广泛认可,但在成年人的整个生命周期中,体能对认知功能影响的特异性却鲜为人知。本研究旨在阐明体能是否与健康成年人的认知和一般智力基本相关,以及较高的体能水平是否与不同年龄阶段相同或不同认知功能的更好表现相关。 方法:对490名参与者(20至70岁)的样本进行分析以检验这种关系。随后,样本被平均分为青年到中年组(YM;20至45岁;n = 254)和中年到老年组(MO;46至70岁;n = 236)。体能通过自行车测力计测试PWC - 130中的最大功率商除以体重(W/kg)来衡量,并辅以自我报告的体能水平。认知表现通过标准化的神经心理测试组合进行评估。 结果:回归模型显示在整个样本中,体能与一般智力(g因素)及其使用结构方程模型(SEM)提取的子成分之间存在关系。这种关联受年龄调节,年龄也调节了一些特定的认知领域,如注意力、逻辑推理和干扰处理。将样本分为两个年龄组后,通过简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评估的认知状态与两个年龄组的体能之间均发现了显著关系。然而除了日常生活中的认知失误(CFQ)外,在YM组中未发现体能与特定认知功能之间的其他关联。相比之下,在MO组中观察到了一些积极关联,如与选择性注意力、言语记忆、工作记忆、逻辑推理和干扰处理。 讨论:这些发现表明,中年到老年成年人比青年到中年成年人从体能中获益更多。根据体能在整个生命周期中对认知影响的神经生物学机制对结果进行了讨论。 临床试验注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05155397,标识符NCT05155397 。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023-5
J Depress Anxiety. 2015-10
Front Public Health. 2017-12-21
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008-10-1
Healthcare (Basel). 2025-5-14
Sports (Basel). 2024-2-13
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023-5
Lancet. 2021-4-24
Trends Neurosci. 2020-7