• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安全手术团队的剖析:一项基于访谈的挪威三级转诊医院手术团队成员定性研究。

The anatomy of safe surgical teams: an interview-based qualitative study among members of surgical teams at tertiary referral hospitals in Norway.

作者信息

Vikan Magnhild, Deilkås Ellen Ct, Valeberg Berit T, Bjørnnes Ann K, Husby Vigdis S, Haugen Arvid S, Danielsen Stein O

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, Oslo, 0130, Norway.

Department of Health Services Research, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

出版信息

Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Feb 19;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00389-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13037-024-00389-w
PMID:38374077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10877820/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In spite of the global implementation of surgical safety checklists to improve patient safety, patients undergoing surgical procedures remain vulnerable to a high risk of potentially preventable complications and adverse outcomes. The present study was designed to explore the surgical teams' perceptions of patient safety culture, capture their perceptions of the risk for adverse events, and identify themes of interest for quality improvement within the surgical department.

METHODS

This qualitative study had an explorative design with an abductive approach. Individual semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted between 10/01/23 and 11/05/23. The participants were members of surgical teams (n = 17), general and orthopedic surgeons (n = 5), anesthesiologists (n = 4), nurse anesthetists (n = 4) and operating room nurses (n = 4). Middle managers recruited purposively from general and orthopedic surgical teams in two tertiary hospitals in Norway, aiming for a maximum variation due to gender, age, and years within the specialty. The data material was analyzed following Braun and Clarke's method for reflexive thematic analysis to generate patterns of meaning and develop themes and subthemes.

RESULTS

The analysis process resulted in three themes describing the participants' perceptions of patient safety culture in the surgical context: (1) individual accountability as a safety net, (2) psychological safety as a catalyst for well-being and safe performance in the operating room, and (3) the importance of proactive structures and participation in organizational learning.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided an empirical insight into the culture of patient safety in the surgical context. The study highlighted the importance of supporting the individuals' competence, building psychological safety in the surgical team, and creating structures and culture promoting a learning organization. Quality improvement projects, including interventions based on these results, may increase patient safety culture and reduce the frequency of adverse events in the surgical context.

摘要

背景

尽管全球都在实施手术安全检查表以提高患者安全,但接受手术的患者仍极易面临潜在可预防并发症和不良后果的高风险。本研究旨在探讨手术团队对患者安全文化的看法,了解他们对不良事件风险的认知,并确定手术科室质量改进的关注主题。

方法

本定性研究采用探索性设计和归纳法。在2023年1月10日至2023年5月11日期间进行了个体半结构化深度访谈。参与者包括手术团队成员(n = 17)、普通外科和骨科医生(n = 5)、麻醉医生(n = 4)、麻醉护士(n = 4)和手术室护士(n = 4)。从挪威两家三级医院的普通外科和骨科手术团队中有意招募中层管理人员,旨在因性别、年龄和专业年限实现最大程度的差异。按照布劳恩和克拉克的反思性主题分析方法对数据材料进行分析,以生成意义模式并形成主题和子主题。

结果

分析过程产生了三个主题,描述了参与者对手术环境中患者安全文化的看法:(1)个人问责作为安全保障,(2)心理安全作为手术室中促进健康和安全表现的催化剂,(3)积极结构和参与组织学习的重要性。

结论

本研究为手术环境中的患者安全文化提供了实证见解。该研究强调了支持个人能力、在手术团队中建立心理安全以及创建促进学习型组织的结构和文化的重要性。包括基于这些结果进行干预的质量改进项目,可能会增强手术环境中的患者安全文化并减少不良事件的发生频率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3781/10877820/eac550f4b486/13037_2024_389_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3781/10877820/eac550f4b486/13037_2024_389_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3781/10877820/eac550f4b486/13037_2024_389_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The anatomy of safe surgical teams: an interview-based qualitative study among members of surgical teams at tertiary referral hospitals in Norway.安全手术团队的剖析:一项基于访谈的挪威三级转诊医院手术团队成员定性研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Feb 19;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00389-w.
2
Positioning the surgical patient - roles, responsibilities and challenges. A qualitative study.手术患者的体位摆放——角色、职责与挑战。一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Feb;81(2):968-977. doi: 10.1111/jan.16278. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Knowledge, safety, and teamwork: a qualitative study on the experiences of anaesthesiologists and nurse anaesthetists working in the preanaesthesia assessment clinic.知识、安全与团队合作:一项关于在麻醉前评估诊所工作的麻醉师和麻醉护士的经验的定性研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Oct 3;22(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01852-w.
5
Surgical teams' attitudes and opinions towards the safety of surgical procedures in public hospitals in the Brazilian Federal District.巴西联邦区公立医院外科团队对外科手术安全性的态度和看法。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 May 17;9:276. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2078-3.
6
[Role-specific targets and teamwork in the operating room].[手术室中的特定角色目标与团队协作]
Anaesthesist. 2017 Dec;66(12):953-960. doi: 10.1007/s00101-017-0380-7.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Exploring patient safety in Swedish specialised home healthcare: an interview study with multidisciplinary teams and clinical managers.探索瑞典专科家庭医疗保健中的患者安全:一项针对多学科团队和临床管理人员的访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e024068. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024068.
9
Exploring the barriers and facilitators of psychological safety in primary care teams: a qualitative study.探索基层医疗团队中心理安全的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 24;21(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06232-7.
10
International Perspectives on Modifications to the Surgical Safety Checklist.国际视角下的手术安全检查表修改
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317183. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17183.

引用本文的文献

1
"One family, one patient": a human-centered approach to safety in the operating room.“一户一人”:手术室安全的以人为本方法
Patient Saf Surg. 2025 May 22;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13037-025-00436-0.
2
Patient safety culture through the lenses of surgical patients: a qualitative study.从手术患者视角看患者安全文化:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 7;25(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12366-9.
3
Unintentionally retained lap sponge mimicking an ovarian cyst two years after Caesarean section in a 37-year old patient: case report of a rare "never event" in Sudan.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic Review of Morbidity and Mortality Meeting Standardization: Does It Lead to Improved Professional Development, System Improvements, Clinician Engagement, and Enhanced Patient Safety Culture?发病率和死亡率会议标准化的系统评价:它是否能带来专业发展的改善、系统改进、临床医生参与度的提高以及患者安全文化的强化?
J Patient Saf. 2024 Mar 1;20(2):125-130. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001184. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
2
The Effects of a Simulation-Based Patient Safety Education Program on Compliance with Patient Safety, Perception of Patient Safety Culture, and Educational Satisfaction of Operating Room Nurses.基于模拟的患者安全教育项目对手术室护士患者安全依从性、患者安全文化认知及教育满意度的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 25;11(21):2824. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212824.
3
一名37岁患者剖宫产两年后,意外遗留的腹腔海绵体酷似卵巢囊肿:苏丹罕见“绝不允许发生的事件”病例报告
Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Aug 16;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00407-x.
Factors determining safety culture in hospitals: a scoping review.影响医院安全文化的因素:范围综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Oct;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002310.
4
Issues and complexities in safety culture assessment in healthcare.医疗保健安全文化评估中的问题与复杂性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 15;11:1217542. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1217542. eCollection 2023.
5
A formula for survival in surgery.手术中的生存秘诀。
Patient Saf Surg. 2023 May 27;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00362-z.
6
Individual Characteristics That Promote or Prevent Psychological Safety and Error Reporting in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.促进或阻碍医疗保健中心理安全和错误报告的个体特征:一项系统综述
J Healthc Leadersh. 2023 Apr 17;15:59-70. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S369242. eCollection 2023.
7
What We Talk About When We Talk About Coping: A Qualitative Study of Surgery Resident's Coping After Complications and Deaths.当我们谈论应对时我们在谈论什么:一项关于手术后并发症和死亡后住院医生应对方式的定性研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):e422-e428. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005854. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
The association between patient safety culture and adverse events - a scoping review.患者安全文化与不良事件的关联——范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09332-8.
9
Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting.主题分析在健康心理学中应用得好吗?对已发表研究的批判性评价,以及对质量实践和报告的建议。
Health Psychol Rev. 2023 Dec;17(4):695-718. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2161594. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
10
The Psychological Safety Scale of the Safety, Communication, Operational, Reliability, and Engagement (SCORE) Survey: A Brief, Diagnostic, and Actionable Metric for the Ability to Speak Up in Healthcare Settings.安全、沟通、运行、可靠性和参与(SCORE)调查的心理安全量表:一种用于衡量医疗保健环境中敢于直言能力的简短、诊断性和可操作性指标。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Sep 1;18(6):513-520. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001048.