• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Commentary on "Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies".

作者信息

Liu Yanting, Suvithayasiri Siravich, Kim Jin-Sung

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Orthopedics, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):464-466. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346488.244. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

DOI:10.14245/ns.2346488.244
PMID:37401064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10323328/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Commentary on "Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies".《关于“用于腰椎椎间融合的三维打印钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼：体外、动物和人体比较研究的系统评价”的述评》
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):464-466. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346488.244. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
2
Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages.钛（Ti）笼在腰椎体间融合中可能优于聚醚醚酮（PEEK）笼：使用 Ti 与 PEEK 笼进行脊柱体间融合的临床和影像学结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2021 May;30(5):1285-1295. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06748-w. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.PEEK 与钛笼在腰椎侧路椎间融合术中的比较：沉降的分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E10. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20367.
4
Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.3D 打印多孔钛合金的骨内生长潜力：体内羊腰椎融合模型中椎间笼材料的直接比较。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1250-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
5
Fusion assessment in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.独立式腰椎椎间融合术中的融合评估：3D打印钛笼与聚醚醚酮（PEEK）椎间融合器的比较
J Spine Surg. 2022 Sep;8(3):323-332. doi: 10.21037/jss-22-17.
6
Early Outcomes of Three-Dimensional-Printed Porous Titanium versus Polyetheretherketone Cage Implantation for Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Degeneration.三维打印多孔钛与聚醚醚酮笼植入治疗症状性相邻节段退变的独立侧路腰椎间融合的早期结果。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;162:e14-e20. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.122. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
7
Comparison Between 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages: 1-Year Outcome After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.三维打印钛笼与聚醚醚酮椎间融合器的比较：微创经椎间孔椎间融合术后1年的结果
Neurospine. 2022 Sep;19(3):524-532. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244140.070. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
8
Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.评估单纯侧路腰椎间融合术中的 cage 沉降：新型 3D 打印钛网与聚醚醚酮（PEEK） cage 的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Aug;30(8):2377-2384. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06912-2. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
9
Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.聚醚醚酮与钛制椎间融合器用于腰椎后路椎间融合术：荟萃分析及文献综述
Neurospine. 2020 Mar;17(1):125-135. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040058.029. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
10
Surgical outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional trajectory screw fixation or cortical bone trajectory screw fixation: A comparative study between the polyetheretherketone cage and the same shape titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cage.使用传统轨迹螺钉固定或皮质骨轨迹螺钉固定进行腰椎后路椎间融合术后的手术结果：聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与相同形状的钛涂层聚醚醚酮椎间融合器的比较研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Oct;209:106945. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106945. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming spinal surgery with innovations in biologics and additive manufacturing.通过生物制剂和增材制造方面的创新变革脊柱外科手术。
Mater Today Bio. 2025 May 13;32:101853. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101853. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Evolving Paradigms in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Learning Curves in Minimally Invasive Spine Techniques.脊柱外科不断演变的范式：微创脊柱技术学习曲线的系统评价
Neurospine. 2024 Dec;21(4):1251-1275. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448838.419. Epub 2024 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies.用于腰椎椎间融合的三维打印钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼：体外、动物和人体对比研究的系统评价
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):451-463. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346244.122. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
2
Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Spinal Implants for Treatment of Spinal Tumors: Perceived Advantages and Limitations.用于治疗脊柱肿瘤的碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮脊柱植入物：感知到的优势与局限性
Neurospine. 2023 Mar;20(1):317-326. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244920.460. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
Comparison Between 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages: 1-Year Outcome After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.三维打印钛笼与聚醚醚酮椎间融合器的比较：微创经椎间孔椎间融合术后1年的结果
Neurospine. 2022 Sep;19(3):524-532. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244140.070. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
4
In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Bone Growth Characteristics in Additive-Manufactured Porous Titanium, Nonporous Titanium, and Porous Tantalum Interbody Cages.增材制造多孔钛、无孔钛和多孔钽椎间融合器骨生长特性的体外和体内比较
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 20;15(10):3670. doi: 10.3390/ma15103670.
5
Pearls and Pitfalls of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.斜外侧椎间融合术的要点与陷阱：一篇全面的叙述性综述
Neurospine. 2022 Mar;19(1):163-176. doi: 10.14245/ns.2143236.618. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
6
Outcomes of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Versus Bilateral Interbody Cages.使用单侧与双侧椎间融合器进行经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的疗效
Neurospine. 2021 Dec;18(4):854-862. doi: 10.14245/ns.2142248.124. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
7
The Titanium-coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion With the Endplate Than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study.钛涂层 PEEK cage 在 PLIF 手术后 6 个月时与终板保持更好的骨融合，优于 PEEK cage：一项多中心、前瞻性、随机研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Aug 1;45(15):E892-E902. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003464.
8
Does implantation site influence bone ingrowth into 3D-printed porous implants?种植部位是否会影响 3D 打印多孔种植体的骨长入？
Spine J. 2019 Nov;19(11):1885-1898. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
9
Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.腰椎椎间融合术：技术、适应证以及椎间融合选择的比较，包括后路腰椎椎间融合术（PLIF）、经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术（TLIF）、改良经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术（MI-TLIF）、斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术/前斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术（OLIF/ATP）、侧方腰椎椎间融合术（LLIF）和前路腰椎椎间融合术（ALIF）
J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05.