• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增材制造多孔钛、无孔钛和多孔钽椎间融合器骨生长特性的体外和体内比较

In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Bone Growth Characteristics in Additive-Manufactured Porous Titanium, Nonporous Titanium, and Porous Tantalum Interbody Cages.

作者信息

Wu Meng-Huang, Lee Ming-Hsueh, Wu Christopher, Tsai Pei-I, Hsu Wei-Bin, Huang Shin-I, Lin Tzu-Hung, Yang Kuo-Yi, Chen Chih-Yu, Chen Shih-Hao, Lee Ching-Yu, Huang Tsung-Jen, Tsau Fang-Hei, Li Yen-Yao

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan.

Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 May 20;15(10):3670. doi: 10.3390/ma15103670.

DOI:10.3390/ma15103670
PMID:35629694
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9147460/
Abstract

Autogenous bone grafts are the gold standard for interbody fusion implant materials; however, they have several disadvantages. Tantalum (Ta) and titanium (Ti) are ideal materials for interbody cages because of their biocompatibility, particularly when they are incorporated into a three-dimensional (3D) porous structure. We conducted an in vitro investigation of the cell attachment and osteogenic markers of self-fabricated uniform porous Ti (20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%), nonporous Ti, and porous Ta cages ( = 6) in each group. Cell attachment, osteogenic markers, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were measured. An in vivo study was performed using a pig-posterior-instrumented anterior interbody fusion model to compare the porous Ti (60%), nonporous Ti, and porous Ta interbody cages in 12 pigs. Implant migration and subsidence, determined using plain radiographs, were recorded before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Harvested implants were assessed for bone ingrowth and attachment. Relative to the 20% and 40% porous Ti cages, the 60% and 80% cages achieved superior cellular migration into cage pores. Among the cages, osteogenic marker and ALP activity levels were the highest in the 60% porous Ti cage, osteocalcin expression was the highest in the nonporous Ti cage, and the 60% porous Ti cage exhibited the lowest subsidence. In conclusion, the designed porous Ti cage is biocompatible and suitable for lumbar interbody fusion surgery and exhibits faster fusion with less subsidence compared with porous Ta and nonporous Ti cages.

摘要

自体骨移植是椎间融合植入材料的金标准;然而,它们有几个缺点。钽(Ta)和钛(Ti)因其生物相容性而成为椎间融合器的理想材料,特别是当它们被制成三维(3D)多孔结构时。我们对每组自行制备的均匀多孔Ti(20%、40%、60%和80%)、无孔Ti和多孔Ta融合器(每组 = 6个)进行了细胞附着和成骨标志物的体外研究。测量了细胞附着、成骨标志物和碱性磷酸酶(ALP)。使用猪后路器械辅助前路椎间融合模型进行体内研究,以比较12头猪的多孔Ti(60%)、无孔Ti和多孔Ta椎间融合器。在手术前、手术后立即以及手术后1、3和6个月,使用X线平片确定植入物的移位和下沉情况,并进行记录。对取出的植入物进行骨长入和附着情况评估。相对于20%和40%的多孔Ti融合器,60%和80%的融合器实现了更好的细胞向融合器孔隙内迁移。在所有融合器中,60%多孔Ti融合器的成骨标志物和ALP活性水平最高,无孔Ti融合器的骨钙素表达最高,60%多孔Ti融合器的下沉最低。总之,所设计的多孔Ti融合器具有生物相容性,适用于腰椎椎间融合手术,与多孔Ta和无孔Ti融合器相比,融合更快且下沉更少。

相似文献

1
In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Bone Growth Characteristics in Additive-Manufactured Porous Titanium, Nonporous Titanium, and Porous Tantalum Interbody Cages.增材制造多孔钛、无孔钛和多孔钽椎间融合器骨生长特性的体外和体内比较
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 20;15(10):3670. doi: 10.3390/ma15103670.
2
Additive-manufactured Ti-6Al-4 V/Polyetheretherketone composite porous cage for Interbody fusion: bone growth and biocompatibility evaluation in a porcine model.增材制造 Ti-6Al-4V/聚醚醚酮复合多孔椎间融合 cage:猪模型中的骨生长和生物相容性评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 11;22(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04022-0.
3
Computational comparison of three posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques by using porous titanium interbody cages with 50% porosity.使用孔隙率为50%的多孔钛椎间融合器对三种腰椎后路椎间融合技术进行计算比较。
Comput Biol Med. 2016 Apr 1;71:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.01.024. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
4
Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.用于腰椎椎间融合的多孔增材制造椎间融合器的生物力学分析:有限元分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;111:e581-e591. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.127. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
5
Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.3D 打印多孔钛合金的骨内生长潜力:体内羊腰椎融合模型中椎间笼材料的直接比较。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1250-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
6
Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with various porous additive manufactured cages.有限元模型预测了各种多孔增材制造椎间融合器在经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术中的生物力学性能。
Comput Biol Med. 2018 Apr 1;95:167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
7
Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.腰椎椎间融合手术中钛涂层与未涂层聚醚醚酮椎间融合器在同一椎间隙的比较。
J Orthop Sci. 2020 Jul;25(4):565-570. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
8
Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.评估单纯侧路腰椎间融合术中的 cage 沉降:新型 3D 打印钛网与聚醚醚酮(PEEK) cage 的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Aug;30(8):2377-2384. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06912-2. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
9
Early bone ingrowth and segmental stability of a trussed titanium cage versus a polyether ether ketone cage in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model.在羊腰椎椎间融合模型中,一种桁架式钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼的早期骨长入和节段稳定性比较。
Spine J. 2022 Jan;22(1):174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
10
Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis.一种具有优化体晶格和微孔终板的 3D 打印多孔椎间融合器的沉降和融合性能:全面的力学和生物学分析。
Spine J. 2022 Jun;22(6):1028-1037. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical analysis of a newly designed and 3D printed plate-locking interbody cage: an observational study of finite element analysis.一种新设计的3D打印锁定钢板椎间融合器的生物力学分析:有限元分析的观察性研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):3534. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88151-9.
2
Natural potential difference induced functional optimization mechanism for Zn-based multimetal bone implants.基于锌的多金属骨植入物的自然电位差诱导功能优化机制
Bioact Mater. 2024 Dec 5;44:572-588. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.10.030. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Immune response to foreign materials in spinal fusion surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulation of Osteoblast Differentiation by Cytokine Networks.细胞因子网络对成骨细胞分化的调控。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 11;22(6):2851. doi: 10.3390/ijms22062851.
2
Potential Health and Environmental Risks of Three-Dimensional Engineered Polymers.三维工程聚合物的潜在健康和环境风险
Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2018 Feb 13;5(2):80-85. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00495. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
Critical analysis of trends in lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders revisited: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcomes.
脊柱融合手术中对外来物质的免疫反应。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 7;9(9):e19950. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19950. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Commentary on "Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies".《关于“用于腰椎椎间融合的三维打印钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼:体外、动物和人体比较研究的系统评价”的述评》
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):464-466. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346488.244. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
5
Design of Ti64/Ta Hybrid Materials by Powder Metallurgy Mimicking Bone Structure.通过粉末冶金模拟骨结构设计Ti64/Ta混合材料。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;16(12):4372. doi: 10.3390/ma16124372.
6
Definition, measurement, and function of pore structure dimensions of bioengineered porous bone tissue materials based on additive manufacturing: A review.基于增材制造的生物工程多孔骨组织材料孔隙结构尺寸的定义、测量及功能:综述
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jan 4;10:1081548. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1081548. eCollection 2022.
7
Prediction and Numerical Study of Thermal Performance of Gradient Porous Structures Based on Voronoi Tessellation Design.基于Voronoi镶嵌设计的梯度多孔结构热性能预测与数值研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 14;15(22):8046. doi: 10.3390/ma15228046.
对退行性疾病腰椎融合术趋势的批判性分析再探讨:技术对融合率和临床结果的影响
Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug;27(8):1868-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5544-x. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
4
Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.3D 打印多孔钛合金的骨内生长潜力:体内羊腰椎融合模型中椎间笼材料的直接比较。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1250-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
5
Additive manufacturing of titanium alloys in the biomedical field: processes, properties and applications.生物医学领域中钛合金的增材制造:工艺、性能及应用
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2018 Apr;16(2):57-67. doi: 10.5301/jabfm.5000371.
6
Biomechanical investigation into the structural design of porous additive manufactured cages using numerical and experimental approaches.采用数值和实验方法对多孔增材制造椎间融合器结构设计进行生物力学研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2016 Sep 1;76:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
7
Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review.用于骨支架和矫形植入物的多孔金属的拓扑设计和增材制造:综述。
Biomaterials. 2016 Mar;83:127-41. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
8
Lumbar pseudarthrosis: a review of current diagnosis and treatment.腰椎假关节:当前诊断与治疗的综述
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E10. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15292.
9
Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review.用于脊柱融合的骨移植替代物:简要综述。
World J Orthop. 2015 Jul 18;6(6):449-56. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i6.449.
10
Porous tantalum in spinal surgery: an overview.多孔钽在脊柱外科手术中的应用概述
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Jan;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1654-x. Epub 2015 Jun 7.