• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接前入路与后外侧入路在初次全髋关节置换术中的临床疗效比较。

Comparison of clinical efficacy between direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, The First Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jun;27(12):5604-5613. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202306_32799.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202306_32799
PMID:37401298
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical efficacy of the direct anterior approach (DAA) vs. posterolateral approach (PLA) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 382 patients who underwent primary THA in our hospital from March 2016 to March 2021 were identified as research subjects, with 183 patients in the DAA group and 199 in the PLA group. Outcome measures included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative creatine kinase (CK), Harris score, visual analogue scale (VAS), postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

DAA resulted in significantly longer operative time but lower intraoperative bleeding volume vs. PLA. Three months postoperatively, patients receiving DAA showed significantly lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and higher Harris scores than those given PLA. No hip dislocation was observed in the DAA group.

CONCLUSIONS

DAA results in less intraoperative hemorrhage and muscle damage, better postoperative recovery, and a lower incidence of hip dislocation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾性分析初次全髋关节置换术(THA)中直接前入路(DAA)与后外侧入路(PLA)的临床疗效。

患者与方法

本研究共纳入了 2016 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月在我院接受初次 THA 的 382 例患者作为研究对象,其中 DAA 组 183 例,PLA 组 199 例。观察指标包括手术时间、术中出血量、术后肌酸激酶(CK)、Harris 评分、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术后住院时间和术后并发症。

结果

与 PLA 相比,DAA 组的手术时间显著延长,但术中出血量显著减少。术后 3 个月,DAA 组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)明显低于 PLA 组,Harris 评分明显高于 PLA 组。DAA 组未发生髋关节脱位。

结论

DAA 可减少术中出血和肌肉损伤,促进术后恢复,降低髋关节脱位的发生率。

相似文献

1
Comparison of clinical efficacy between direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty.直接前入路与后外侧入路在初次全髋关节置换术中的临床疗效比较。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jun;27(12):5604-5613. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202306_32799.
2
The Direct Anterior Approach versus the Posterolateral Approach on the Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Clinical Study.直接前入路与后外侧入路在全髋关节置换术后结果的比较:一项回顾性临床研究。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct;14(10):2563-2570. doi: 10.1111/os.13444. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
3
Total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach in the lateral position for the treatment of ankylosed hips.直接前侧入路侧卧位全髋关节置换术治疗髋关节僵直。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Aug;30(6):993-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02655-w. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
4
Patient-reported results of simultaneous direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasties performed in the same patients.患者报告的同期行直接前入路和后外侧入路全髋关节置换术的结果。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2021 Nov 13;22(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00611-w.
5
Direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of results on early post-operative period.直接前入路与后外侧入路在全髋关节置换术中的比较:早期术后结果的荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02218-7.
6
Direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.直接前入路与后外侧入路治疗老年股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术的疗效比较:Meta 分析与系统评价。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):1378-1392. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2193424.
7
Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Lateral Position.直接前入路侧卧位全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折。
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 May 18;19:883-889. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S458179. eCollection 2024.
8
Comparison of the Early Results of Lateral Direct Anterior Approach (L-DAA) and Traditional Posterolateral Approach (PLA) in Hip Arthroplasty.髋关节置换术中外侧直接前入路(L-DAA)与传统后外侧入路(PLA)的早期结果比较。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Dec 22;2021:1187011. doi: 10.1155/2021/1187011. eCollection 2021.
9
Efficacy of Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Lateral Approach for Total Hip Replacement in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.直接前入路与后外侧入路在帕金森病患者全髋关节置换术中的疗效比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Apr 13;29:e939682. doi: 10.12659/MSM.939682.
10
Comparison of Early Functional Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Direct Anterior or Posterolateral Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial.直接前入路与后外侧入路全髋关节置换术后早期功能恢复的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3421-3428. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.056. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Associated with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Total Hip Replacement Surgery: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.全髋关节置换手术中与股外侧皮神经(LFCN)阻滞相关的关节周围神经组(PENG)阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)的比较:双盲随机对照试验
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):230. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060230.
2
Direct anterior approach enhances early recovery outcomes in total hip arthroplasty among elderly individuals with femoral neck fractures: a propensity-matched cohort study.直接前路手术可改善老年股骨颈骨折患者全髋关节置换术后的早期恢复结局:一项倾向匹配队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 24;20(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05941-7.
3
Dislocation incidence and risk factors following direct anterior primary total hip arthroplasty: a consecutive, single-surgeon cohort.
直接前路初次全髋关节置换术后的脱位发生率及危险因素:一项连续的单术者队列研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 5;26(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08683-z.
4
AI-assisted direct anterior approach posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study based on artifact-reduced CT 3D reconstruction.人工智能辅助全髋关节置换术中直接前路与后外侧入路:基于去伪影CT三维重建的回顾性队列研究
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Apr 14;13:1509200. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1509200. eCollection 2025.
5
Surgical procedure and retrospective comparative series of Microport's AnteriorPath vs. AMIS in total hip arthroplasty. Preliminary findings from a single institution.微创前路与直接前路在全髋关节置换术中的手术步骤及回顾性比较系列研究。单机构初步研究结果。
Turk J Surg. 2025 May 30;41(2):186-192. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6613. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
6
Clinical efficacy of direct anterior approach versus posterior lateral approach for total hip replacement in middle-aged and elderly patients of femoral neck fracture.直接前路与后外侧入路行全髋关节置换术治疗中老年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):5273. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83371-x.