Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States.
J Neurophysiol. 2023 Aug 1;130(2):332-344. doi: 10.1152/jn.00061.2023. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
Although implicit motor adaptation is driven by sensory-prediction errors (SPEs), recent work has shown that task success modulates this process. Task success has typically been defined as hitting a target, which signifies the goal of the movement. Visuomotor adaptation tasks are uniquely situated to experimentally manipulate task success independently from SPE by changing the target size or the location of the target. These two, distinct manipulations may influence implicit motor adaptation in different ways, so, over four experiments, we sought to probe the efficacy of each manipulation. We found that changes in target size, which caused the target to fully envelop the cursor, only affected implicit adaptation for a narrow range of SPE sizes, while jumping the target to overlap with the cursor more reliably and robustly affected implicit adaptation. Taken together, our data indicate that, while task success exerts a small effect on implicit adaptation, these effects are susceptible to methodological variations. Future investigations of the effect of task success on implicit adaptation could benefit from employing target jump manipulations instead of target size manipulations. Recent work has suggested that task success, namely, hitting a target, influences implicit motor adaptation. Here, we observed that implicit adaptation is modulated by target jump manipulations, where the target abruptly "jumps" to meet the cursor; however, implicit adaptation was only weakly modulated by target size manipulations, where a static target either envelops or excludes the cursor. We discuss how these manipulations may exert their effects through different mechanisms.
虽然内隐运动适应是由感觉预测误差(SPEs)驱动的,但最近的研究表明,任务成功会调节这个过程。任务成功通常被定义为击中目标,这标志着运动的目标。视动适应任务独特的地方在于,可以通过改变目标大小或目标位置,独立于 SPE 来实验性地操纵任务成功。这两种不同的操作可能以不同的方式影响内隐运动适应,因此,在四项实验中,我们试图探究每种操作的效果。我们发现,目标大小的变化(使得目标完全包围光标)仅影响了特定范围内 SPE 大小的内隐适应,而目标跳跃与光标重叠更可靠和稳健地影响了内隐适应。总之,我们的数据表明,虽然任务成功对内隐适应有微小的影响,但这些影响易受方法学变化的影响。未来对任务成功对内隐适应影响的研究可能受益于采用目标跳跃操作,而不是目标大小操作。最近的研究表明,任务成功,即击中目标,会影响内隐运动适应。在这里,我们观察到,目标跳跃操作会调节内隐适应,其中目标突然“跳跃”以与光标相遇;然而,目标大小操作对内隐适应的调节作用很弱,其中静态目标要么包围要么排除光标。我们讨论了这些操作如何通过不同的机制发挥作用。