Suppr超能文献

接受抗凝或抗血小板治疗患者的胸椎旁阻滞和竖脊肌平面阻滞的安全性。证据的叙述性综述。

The safety of thoracic paravertebral block and erector spinae plane block in patients treated with anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. A narrative review of the evidence.

作者信息

Nisi Fulvio, Sella Nicolò, DI Gregorio Guido, Lubian Marta, Giustiniano Enrico, Rosboch Giulio L, Balzani Eleonora, Toscano Antonio, Strano Giacomo, Rispoli Marco, Massullo Domenico, Fiorelli Silvia, Santonastaso Domenico, Agnoletti Vanni, Piccioni Federico

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy -

Institute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2023 Oct;89(10):914-922. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17288-9. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The management of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spine plane block (ESPB) in patients treated with anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy is based on limited clinical data, mostly from single case reports. Scientific societies and organizations do not provide strong detailed indications about the limitations of these regional anesthesia techniques in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. This review summarizes evidence regarding TPVB and ESPB in patients under antithrombotic therapy.

EVIDENCE ACQUSITION

A literature review from PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Web of Science databases was conducted from 1999 to 2022 to identify articles concerning TPVB and ESPB for cardio-thoracic surgery or thoracic procedures in patients under anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 1704 articles were identified from the initial search. After removing duplicates and not-pertinent articles, 15 articles were analyzed. The results demonstrated a low risk of bleeding for TPVB and minimal or absent risk for ESPB. Ultrasound guidance was extensively used to perform ESPB, but not for TPVB.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the low level of evidence available, TPVB and ESPB are reasonably safe options in patients ineligible for epidural anesthesia due to antithrombotic therapy. The few published studies suggest that ESPB offers a risk profile safer than TPVB and the use of ultrasound guidance minimizes any complication. Since the literature available does not allow us to draw definitive conclusions, future adequately-powered trials are warranted to determine the indications and the safety of TPVB and ESPB in patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.

摘要

引言

对于接受抗凝或抗血小板治疗的患者,胸段椎旁阻滞(TPVB)和竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)的管理基于有限的临床数据,大多来自单例报告。科学协会和组织并未就这些区域麻醉技术在接受抗血栓治疗患者中的局限性提供强有力的详细指征。本综述总结了关于抗血栓治疗患者中TPVB和ESPB的证据。

证据获取

对1999年至2022年期间PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane、谷歌学术和科学网数据库进行文献综述,以识别关于接受抗凝或抗血小板治疗的患者在心胸外科手术或胸部手术中使用TPVB和ESPB的文章。

证据综合

初步检索共识别出1704篇文章。去除重复和不相关文章后,分析了15篇文章。结果表明TPVB出血风险低,ESPB风险极小或无风险。超声引导广泛用于实施ESPB,但未用于TPVB。

结论

尽管现有证据水平较低,但对于因抗血栓治疗而不适合硬膜外麻醉的患者,TPVB和ESPB是合理的安全选择。少数已发表的研究表明,ESPB的风险状况比TPVB更安全,使用超声引导可将任何并发症降至最低。由于现有文献不允许我们得出明确结论,因此有必要进行未来充分有力的试验,以确定TPVB和ESPB在接受抗凝或抗血小板治疗患者中的指征和安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验