Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China (mainland).
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Jul 6;29:e940247. doi: 10.12659/MSM.940247.
BACKGROUND Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are widely used in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). However, they have corresponding adverse effects, including hypotension for TPVB and unpredictable injectate spread in ESPB. An optimal perioperative analgesic strategy remains controversial. We investigated the effect of ultrasound-guided combined TPVB and ESPB (CTEB) for VATS. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 120 patients scheduled for thoracic surgery were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided TPVB, ESPB, or CTEB preoperatively. Postoperative analgesia was achieved with sufentanil patient-controlled intravenous analgesia. The primary outcome was the static pain score at 2 h after surgery. RESULTS The static pain score 2 h postoperatively was significantly different among the 3 groups. This difference was statistically significant for Group ESPB vs Group TPVB (P=0.004), but not for Group ESPB vs Group CTEB (P=0.767), or Group TPVB vs Group CTEB (P=0.117). Group TPVB exhibited the highest incidence of hypotension among the 3 groups. More patients experienced a sensory loss in Groups TPVB and CTEB 30 min after the block performance. Patients receiving CTEB exhibited a lower incidence of chronic pain 6 months postoperatively than those in Group ESPB. CONCLUSIONS CTEB does not enhance the analgesic effect of ESPB in patients undergoing VATS; however, it may induce a faster sensory loss after nerve block and reduce the incidence of postoperative chronic pain compared with ESPB. CTEB may also help to reduce the incidence of intraoperative hypotension compared with TPVB.
胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)和竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)广泛应用于电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)。然而,它们都有相应的不良反应,TPVB 可导致低血压,ESPB 中注射剂的扩散不可预测。因此,一种理想的围手术期镇痛策略仍存在争议。我们研究了超声引导下联合 TPVB 和 ESPB(CTEB)在 VATS 中的效果。
共 120 例拟行胸科手术的患者随机分为术前接受超声引导下 TPVB、ESPB 或 CTEB 的三组。术后采用舒芬太尼患者自控静脉镇痛。主要观察指标为术后 2 h 的静息疼痛评分。
三组术后 2 h 的静息疼痛评分存在显著差异。与 TPVB 组相比,ESPB 组的差异有统计学意义(P=0.004),而 ESPB 组与 CTEB 组之间的差异无统计学意义(P=0.767),TPVB 组与 CTEB 组之间的差异也无统计学意义(P=0.117)。TPVB 组的低血压发生率在三组中最高。TPVB 和 CTEB 组在阻滞后 30 min 时,更多的患者出现感觉丧失。与 ESPB 组相比,CTEB 组术后 6 个月慢性疼痛的发生率较低。
与 ESPB 相比,CTEB 并未增强 VATS 患者的镇痛效果,但可能在神经阻滞后更快地引起感觉丧失,并降低术后慢性疼痛的发生率。与 TPVB 相比,CTEB 还可能有助于降低术中低血压的发生率。