Zengin Musa, Baldemir Ramazan, Ulger Gulay, Sazak Hilal, Alagoz Ali
Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Cureus. 2021 Jun 12;13(6):e15614. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15614. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Background The combination of a thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the combination of TPVB and ESPB particularly on postoperative pain scores in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Methods From January 1, 2021, to March 1, 2021, 13 patients older than 18 years who underwent combined ESPB and TPVB for analgesic treatment after elective VATS were included in the study. Standard anesthesia induction was performed for all patients, and the block was performed in the lateral decubitis position before surgery. Using the in-plane technique, an ultrasound (US)-compatible 22-gauge, 8-mm nerve block needle was introduced 2-3 cm lateral to the spinous process of the T6 vertebra and advanced in the caudocranial direction. Fifteen (15) ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered and pleural depression was observed. The same needle was withdrawn from the paravertebral space and advanced into the interfascial plane above the transverse process and below the erector spinae muscle at the T5 level. Then, 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected. Results The combination of TPVB and ESPB was performed in 13 patients. The mean age was 44.3 (21-68) years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 23.21 (16.9-35.9) kg/m. Postoperative 24 hours morphine consumption was 24.5 (16-42) mg. In three cases, visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest were ≥4; therefore, tramadol (25 mg, IV) was given as an additional analgesic. Nausea and vomiting were observed in only one case in the early postoperative period. Conclusıons As a new technique, the combination of TPVB and ESPB in this preliminary study provided effective postoperative pain management along with the use of morphine in acceptable quantities. Large-scale, randomized-controlled, and comparative studies are needed to demonstrate the efficacy of the combination of TPVB and ESPB.
胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)和竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)联合应用尚未得到研究。我们旨在评估TPVB与ESPB联合应用对电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)患者术后疼痛评分的影响。方法:2021年1月1日至2021年3月1日,13例年龄大于18岁、择期VATS术后接受ESPB和TPVB联合镇痛治疗的患者纳入本研究。所有患者均行标准麻醉诱导,术前在侧卧位进行阻滞。采用平面内技术,将一根与超声(US)兼容的22G、8mm神经阻滞针在T6椎体棘突外侧2-3cm处进针,向头侧方向推进。注入15ml 0.25%布比卡因,观察有无胸膜压陷。将同一根针从椎旁间隙拔出,在T5水平推进到横突上方、竖脊肌下方的筋膜间平面。然后注入15ml 0.25%布比卡因。结果:13例患者接受了TPVB与ESPB联合阻滞。平均年龄44.3(21-68)岁。平均体重指数(BMI)为23.21(16.9-35.9)kg/m²。术后24小时吗啡消耗量为24.5(16-42)mg。3例患者静息时视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分≥4分;因此,追加静脉注射曲马多(25mg)作为镇痛药物。术后早期仅1例出现恶心呕吐。结论:作为一种新技术,本初步研究中TPVB与ESPB联合应用在合理使用吗啡的情况下提供了有效的术后疼痛管理。需要大规模、随机对照和比较研究来证实TPVB与ESPB联合应用的疗效。