• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社会人口因素和认知标志特征的机器算法预测安全标志理解的比较研究。

A comparative investigation of machine learning algorithms for predicting safety signs comprehension based on socio-demographic factors and cognitive sign features.

机构信息

Department of Ergonomics, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Occupational Health Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Hemmat Highway, Tehran, 1449614535, Iran.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 5;13(1):10843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38065-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-38065-1
PMID:37407611
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10322991/
Abstract

This study examines whether the socio-demographic factors and cognitive sign features can be used for envisaging safety signs comprehensibility using predictive machine learning (ML) techniques. This study will determine the role of different machine learning components such as feature selection and classification to determine suitable factors for safety construction signs comprehensibility. A total of 2310 participants were requested to guess the meaning of 20 construction safety signs (four items for each of the mandatory, prohibition, emergency, warning, and firefighting signs) using the open-ended method. Moreover, the participants were asked to rate the cognitive design features of each sign in terms of familiarity, concreteness, simplicity, meaningfulness, and semantic closeness on a 0-100 rating scale. Subsequently, all eight features (age, experience, education level, familiarity, concreteness, meaningfulness, semantic closeness, and simplicity) were used for classification. Furthermore, the 14 most popular supervised classifiers were implemented and evaluated for safety sign comprehensibility prediction using these eight features. Also, filter and wrapper methods were used as feature selection techniques. Results of feature selection techniques indicate that among the eight features considered in this study, familiarity, simplicity, and meaningfulness are found to be the most relevant and effective components in predicting the comprehensibility of selected safety signs. Further, when these three features are used for classification, the K-NN classifier achieves the highest classification accuracy of 94.369% followed by medium Gaussian SVM which achieves a classification accuracy of 76.075% under hold-out data division protocol. The machine learning (ML) technique was adopted as a promising approach to addressing the issue of comprehensibility, especially in terms of determining factors affecting the safety signs' comprehension. The cognitive sign features of familiarity, simplicity, and meaningfulness can provide useful information in terms of designing user-friendly safety signs.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨社会人口因素和认知符号特征是否可用于使用预测机器学习 (ML) 技术预测安全标志的可理解性。本研究将确定不同机器学习组件(如特征选择和分类)的作用,以确定安全施工标志可理解性的合适因素。共有 2310 名参与者被要求使用开放式方法猜测 20 个施工安全标志(每个强制性、禁止、紧急、警告和消防标志各有四个项目)的含义。此外,参与者被要求根据熟悉度、具体性、简单性、有意义性和语义接近度对每个标志的认知设计特征进行 0-100 评分。随后,将所有 8 个特征(年龄、经验、教育水平、熟悉度、具体性、有意义性、语义接近度和简单性)用于分类。此外,实施了 14 种最受欢迎的监督分类器,并使用这 8 个特征评估其对安全标志可理解性的预测能力。同时,还使用了过滤和包装方法作为特征选择技术。特征选择技术的结果表明,在所考虑的这 8 个特征中,熟悉度、简单性和有意义性被认为是预测所选安全标志可理解性的最相关和最有效的组件。此外,当这三个特征用于分类时,K-NN 分类器的分类准确率最高,为 94.369%,其次是中等高斯 SVM,在保留数据分割协议下的分类准确率为 76.075%。机器学习 (ML) 技术被采纳为一种有前途的方法来解决可理解性问题,特别是在确定影响安全标志理解的因素方面。熟悉度、简单性和有意义性等认知符号特征可以为设计用户友好的安全标志提供有用的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cb7/10322991/747d005ee9c0/41598_2023_38065_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cb7/10322991/ba6e26653376/41598_2023_38065_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cb7/10322991/747d005ee9c0/41598_2023_38065_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cb7/10322991/ba6e26653376/41598_2023_38065_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cb7/10322991/747d005ee9c0/41598_2023_38065_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative investigation of machine learning algorithms for predicting safety signs comprehension based on socio-demographic factors and cognitive sign features.基于社会人口因素和认知标志特征的机器算法预测安全标志理解的比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 5;13(1):10843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38065-1.
2
The guessing of mine safety signs meaning: effects of user factors and cognitive sign features.猜测安全标志含义:用户因素和认知标志特征的影响。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2012;18(2):195-208. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2012.11076928.
3
The effects of driver factors and sign design features on the comprehensibility of traffic signs.驾驶员因素和标志设计特征对交通标志可理解性的影响。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(3):321-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.02.031. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
4
The guessability of traffic signs: effects of prospective-user factors and sign design features.交通标志的可猜测性:潜在用户因素和标志设计特征的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Nov;39(6):1245-57. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.018. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
5
Predicting Health Material Accessibility: Development of Machine Learning Algorithms.预测卫生材料可及性:机器学习算法的开发
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Sep 1;9(9):e29175. doi: 10.2196/29175.
6
Machine-learning models for activity class prediction: A comparative study of feature selection and classification algorithms.机器学习模型在活动分类预测中的应用:特征选择与分类算法的对比研究。
Gait Posture. 2021 Sep;89:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
7
Effects of prospective-user factors and sign design features on guessability of pharmaceutical pictograms.预期使用者因素和标识设计特征对药品象形图可猜测性的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Feb;90(2):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
8
Computer-assisted lip diagnosis on Traditional Chinese Medicine using multi-class support vector machines.基于多类支持向量机的中医唇诊计算机辅助诊断。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012 Aug 16;12:127. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-127.
9
Predicting the Cognitive Ability of Young Women Using a New Feature Selection Algorithm.使用新的特征选择算法预测年轻女性的认知能力。
J Mol Neurosci. 2023 Aug;73(7-8):678-691. doi: 10.1007/s12031-023-02145-8. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
10
Optimizing prognostic factors of five-year survival in gastric cancer patients using feature selection techniques with machine learning algorithms: a comparative study.使用机器学习算法进行特征选择技术优化胃癌患者五年生存率的预后因素:一项比较研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02154-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of disaster risk perception and influencing factors among hospital personnel using structural equation modeling.运用结构方程模型评估医院工作人员的灾害风险认知及影响因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 14;15(1):12780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97747-0.
2
Correcting spelling mistakes in Persian texts with rules and deep learning methods.使用规则和深度学习方法纠正波斯语文本中的拼写错误。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 15;13(1):19945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47295-2.

本文引用的文献

1
An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for identification and prioritization of factors affecting fall from height accidents in the construction industry.一种用于识别和优先排序影响建筑业高处坠落事故因素的集成DEMATEL-ANP方法。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2023 Jun;29(2):474-483. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2022.2052479. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
2
The Effect of Safety Signs on the Monitoring of Conflict and Erroneous Response.安全标志对冲突监测及错误反应的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 17;13:830929. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830929. eCollection 2022.
3
Analysis of the Characteristics of Fatal Accidents in the Construction Industry in China Based on Statistical Data.
基于统计数据的中国建筑行业致命事故特征分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 23;18(4):2162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042162.
4
AI applications to medical images: From machine learning to deep learning.人工智能在医学图像中的应用:从机器学习到深度学习。
Phys Med. 2021 Mar;83:9-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
5
Non-fatal occupational accidents in Brunei Darussalam.文莱达鲁萨兰国的非致命性职业事故。
Ind Health. 2021 Aug 17;59(3):193-200. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2020-0174. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
6
Reviewing Machine Learning and Image Processing Based Decision-Making Systems for Breast Cancer Imaging.基于机器学习和图像处理的乳腺癌成像决策支持系统综述。
J Med Syst. 2021 Jan 4;45(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01689-1.
7
Scientometric Analysis of Safety Sign Research: 1990-2019.安全标志研究的科学计量分析:1990-2019 年。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 1;18(1):273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010273.
8
A novel fitness function in genetic programming for medical data classification.遗传编程中的一种新颖的健身功能,用于医学数据分类。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Dec;112:103623. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103623. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
9
Dysregulated microRNAs in laryngeal cancer: a comprehensive meta-analysis using a robust rank aggregation approach.喉癌中失调的 microRNAs:使用稳健等级聚合方法的综合荟萃分析。
Future Oncol. 2020 Nov;16(33):2723-2734. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0394. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
10
Comprehensibility of pharmaceutical pictograms: Effect of prospective-user factors and cognitive sign design features.药品象形图的可理解性:潜在用户因素和认知符号设计特征的影响
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Feb;17(2):356-361. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.03.025. Epub 2020 Apr 17.