• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

**COVID-19 大流行期间的沟通不平等:美国和韩国的社会经济差异和预防行为。**

Communication inequalities in the COVID-19 pandemic: socioeconomic differences and preventive behaviors in the United States and South Korea.

机构信息

Department of Media and Communication & Institute of Social Sciences, Incheon National University, Incheon, South Korea.

Department of Communication and Journalism, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 5;23(1):1290. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16211-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-16211-8
PMID:37407976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10320997/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Communication inequalities are important mechanisms linking socioeconomic backgrounds to health outcomes. Guided by the structural influence model of communication, this study examined the intermediate role of health communication in the relationship between education, income, and preventive behavioral intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States and South Korea.

METHODS

The data were collected through two online surveys conducted by two professional research firms in the US (April 1-3, 2020) and South Korea (April 9-16, 2020). To test the mediating role of health communication, as well as the hypothesized relationships in the proposed model, we performed a path analysis using Mplus 6.1.

RESULTS

In analyzing survey data from 1050 American and 1175 Korean adults, we found that one's socioeconomic positions were associated with their intentions to engage in COVID-19 preventive behaviors through affecting their health communication experiences and then efficacious beliefs. Differences in education and income were associated with willingness to engage in preventive behaviors by constraining health communication among people with low levels of education and income. The findings showed notable differences and some similarities between the US and South Korea. For example, while income was positively associated with health communication in both US and South Korea, education was only significantly related to health communication in US but not in South Korea.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests health communication strategies such as choice of communication channels and messages to promote intention for COVID-19 prevention behaviors in particular consideration of individual differences in socioeconomic positions in countries with different cultural features. Pubic policies and health campaigns can utilize the suggestions to promote efficacy and preventive behavioral intention during early pandemics.

摘要

背景

沟通不平等是将社会经济背景与健康结果联系起来的重要机制。本研究以沟通的结构影响模型为指导,考察了健康沟通在美国和韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间在教育、收入与预防行为意向之间的关系中的中介作用。

方法

数据通过美国和韩国的两家专业研究公司进行的两次在线调查收集。为了检验健康沟通的中介作用以及所提出模型中假设关系,我们使用 Mplus 6.1 进行路径分析。

结果

在分析来自 1050 名美国和 1175 名韩国成年人的调查数据时,我们发现一个人的社会经济地位通过影响其健康沟通体验和随后的效能信念,与他们参与 COVID-19 预防行为的意向相关。教育和收入的差异通过限制教育和收入水平较低的人的健康沟通,与参与预防行为的意愿相关。研究结果显示了美国和韩国之间的显著差异和一些相似之处。例如,虽然收入与美国和韩国的健康沟通均呈正相关,但教育仅与美国的健康沟通显著相关,而与韩国无关。

结论

本研究表明,在具有不同文化特征的国家中,考虑到社会经济地位的个体差异,健康沟通策略,如选择沟通渠道和信息,以促进 COVID-19 预防行为的意向。公共政策和健康运动可以利用这些建议在早期大流行期间提高效能和预防行为意向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e91/10320997/768dddcc94e5/12889_2023_16211_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e91/10320997/5d9715e8acea/12889_2023_16211_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e91/10320997/7663cb9722e8/12889_2023_16211_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e91/10320997/768dddcc94e5/12889_2023_16211_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e91/10320997/5d9715e8acea/12889_2023_16211_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e91/10320997/7663cb9722e8/12889_2023_16211_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e91/10320997/768dddcc94e5/12889_2023_16211_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Communication inequalities in the COVID-19 pandemic: socioeconomic differences and preventive behaviors in the United States and South Korea.**COVID-19 大流行期间的沟通不平等:美国和韩国的社会经济差异和预防行为。**
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 5;23(1):1290. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16211-8.
2
Infection preventive behaviors and its association with perceived threat and perceived social factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea: 2020 community health survey.在韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间的感染预防行为及其与感知威胁和感知社会因素的关系:2020 年社区卫生调查。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):1381. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13755-z.
3
The dark side of social capital: Geographic differences in COVID-19 preventive behaviors among older adults in South Korea.社会资本的阴暗面:韩国老年人 COVID-19 预防行为的地域差异。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2024 Mar;24 Suppl 1:377-384. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14807. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Perceived Effectiveness of COVID-19 Preventive Practices and Behavioral Intention: Survey of a Representative Adult Sample in the United States.美国代表性成人样本对 COVID-19 预防措施的感知效果和行为意向:一项调查。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Oct 10;10:e39919. doi: 10.2196/39919.
5
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
6
Thinking about Social Consequences of COVID-19 Influenced Preventive Intention: The Case of South Korea.思考新冠疫情的社会影响对预防意图的作用:以韩国为例
Health Commun. 2023 Jul;38(8):1563-1571. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.2020981. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
7
Comparison of the efficacy of COVID-19 responses in South Korea and the United States.比较韩国和美国的 COVID-19 应对措施的效果。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2370611. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2370611. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
8
Social-ecological factors related to preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea.与韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间预防行为相关的社会-生态因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0266264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266264. eCollection 2022.
9
Effects of COVID-19 Emergency Alert Text Messages on Practicing Preventive Behaviors: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey in South Korea.新冠疫情紧急警报短信对践行预防行为的影响:韩国基于网络的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 25;23(2):e24165. doi: 10.2196/24165.
10
Novel Predictors of COVID-19 Protective Behaviors Among US Adults: Cross-sectional Survey.新冠病毒保护行为的新型预测因子:美国成年人的横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 20;23(4):e23488. doi: 10.2196/23488.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of socioeconomic factors during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a spatial analysis.新冠大流行早期的社会经济因素的影响:一项空间分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 18;22(1):1212. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13618-7.
2
Socioeconomic inequality in compliance with precautions and health behavior changes during the COVID-19 outbreak: an analysis of the Korean Community Health Survey 2020.新冠疫情期间遵守预防措施和健康行为变化的社会经济不平等:对 2020 年韩国社区健康调查的分析。
Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022013. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2022013. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
3
Direct and Indirect Associations of Media Use With COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Korea: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey.
直接和间接关联的媒体使用与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫在韩国:横断面网络调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 6;24(1):e32329. doi: 10.2196/32329.
4
Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Switzerland: Health Protective Behavior in the Context of Communication and Perceptions of Efficacy, Norms, and Threat.瑞士新冠疫情期间的社交距离:在沟通以及对效能、规范和威胁的认知背景下的健康保护行为
Health Commun. 2023 Apr;38(4):779-789. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1976360. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
5
Association of Socioeconomic Characteristics With Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes in Japan.日本社会经济特征与 COVID-19 结局差异的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117060. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17060.
6
Red Media, Blue Media, Trump Briefings, and COVID-19: Examining How Information Sources Predict Risk Preventive Behaviors via Threat and Efficacy.红媒、蓝媒、特朗普简报和 COVID-19:通过威胁和效能考察信息来源如何预测风险预防行为。
Health Commun. 2022 Dec;37(14):1707-1714. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1914386. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
7
Effect of socioeconomic inequalities and vulnerabilities on health-system preparedness and response to COVID-19 in Brazil: a comprehensive analysis.巴西社会经济不平等和脆弱性对新冠疫情防控准备和应对的影响:一项综合分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jun;9(6):e782-e792. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00081-4. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
8
Health Inequalities in the Time of COVID-19: The Globally Reinforcing Need to Strengthen Health Inequalities Research Capacities.新冠疫情下的健康不平等:全球强化加强健康不平等研究能力的必要性。
Int J Health Serv. 2021 Jul;51(3):300-304. doi: 10.1177/0020731421993939. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
The Communication Infrastructure as a Social Determinant of Health: Implications for Health Policymaking and Practice.通信基础设施作为健康的社会决定因素:对卫生政策制定和实践的影响。
Milbank Q. 2021 Mar;99(1):24-40. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12496. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
The relationship between cultural tightness-looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis.文化紧密-宽松度与 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数之间的关系:全球分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Mar;5(3):e135-e144. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30301-6. Epub 2021 Jan 29.