Suppr超能文献

比较韩国和美国的 COVID-19 应对措施的效果。

Comparison of the efficacy of COVID-19 responses in South Korea and the United States.

机构信息

The Fessenden School, West Newton, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2370611. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2370611. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic devastated many countries worldwide by causing large numbers of fatalities. In our research, we wanted to answer the question: Why was there such a large difference in the mortality rate between South Korea and the United States? This is because many East Asian countries, such as Korea, had a lower mortality rate than many countries, including developed ones, across the world - the mortality rate of South Korea was about five times lower than the United States.

METHODS

This study comprehensively compares strategies used to address the COVID-19 pandemic in two different countries: South Korea and the United States. The various aspects of these two countries' responses are examined, including initial response, information dissemination and public compliance, mitigation strategies, and vaccine rollout and their impacts.

RESULTS

Early and widespread testing, rigorous contact tracing, the clear release of government information, and an organized vaccine rollout powered a proactive approach in South Korea. The United States had a contrasting response consisting of delayed and more decentralized measures, where testing lagged due to varying policies and the political controversies facing vaccine distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

We signify the gravity of rapid response and testing, clear communication, and efficient vaccine distribution, as we believe this could correlate with a lower mortality rate. In addition, we discuss future directions, including the need for a specific health infrastructure and protocol against highly infectious outbreaks.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情导致大量死亡,使许多国家陷入困境。在我们的研究中,我们想回答这样一个问题:为什么韩国和美国的死亡率存在如此大的差异?这是因为许多东亚国家,如韩国,死亡率比世界上许多国家,包括发达国家都要低得多——韩国的死亡率大约是美国的五分之一。

方法

本研究全面比较了韩国和美国两个不同国家在应对新冠疫情方面所采取的策略。研究考察了这两个国家应对措施的各个方面,包括初期反应、信息传播和公众遵守、缓解策略以及疫苗接种和影响。

结果

早期和广泛的检测、严格的接触者追踪、政府信息的明确发布以及有组织的疫苗接种推动了韩国的积极应对措施。美国的应对措施则相反,包括延迟和更分散的措施,由于政策不同以及疫苗分发面临的政治争议,检测滞后。

结论

我们强调快速反应和检测、清晰的沟通以及高效的疫苗分发的重要性,因为我们相信这可能与较低的死亡率相关。此外,我们还讨论了未来的方向,包括需要建立针对高传染性疫情的特定卫生基础设施和协议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d7f/11328807/0ed28502e5c4/ZGHA_A_2370611_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验