• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发针对肿瘤的 PRO-CTCAE 项目集:在三家德国门诊癌症中心的横断面调查分析。

Developing tumor-specific PRO-CTCAE item sets: analysis of a cross-sectional survey in three German outpatient cancer centers.

机构信息

Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 4, 53121, Bonn, Germany.

National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 5;23(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11115-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-023-11115-7
PMID:37407982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10320985/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To include the patient perspective in the assessment of adverse events in oncology, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) was developed by the US National Cancer Institute, the so called PRO-CTCAE. The objective of this study was the development of disease-specific PRO-CTCAE item sets for patients with breast cancer (BC), multiple myeloma (MM), and prostate cancer (PC).

METHODS

The cross-sectional survey was conducted at three German outpatient cancer centers. Prevalence and importance of the 78 PRO-CTCAE symptoms were assessed using a patient questionnaire. To select the most relevant PRO-CTCAE items for each tumor entity, symptoms were ranked based on patient answers.

RESULTS

101 patients with BC, 107 with MM, and 66 with PC participated. The final item sets contained 21 symptoms (BC) or 19 symptoms (MM and PC), respectively. Eight symptoms (fatigue, muscle pain, insomnia, joint pain, general pain, dizziness, shortness of breath, and swelling) were represented in all three item sets. Fatigue was the symptom with the highest ranking across item sets followed by insomnia. Symptoms with the highest rankings represented in only one item set were symptoms affecting the urogenital system in the PC item set, blurred vision in the BC item set, and decreased appetite in the MM item set.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual PRO-CTCAE item sets for a German patient population were developed for the three tumor entities on the basis of patients' differences in symptom profiles and perceptions. The quality and psychometric criteria of the newly compiled item sets should be evaluated in validation studies.

摘要

背景

为了将患者视角纳入肿瘤不良反应评估中,美国国家癌症研究所开发了一种患者报告结局(PRO)版通用不良事件术语标准(CTCAE),即所谓的 PRO-CTCAE。本研究的目的是为乳腺癌(BC)、多发性骨髓瘤(MM)和前列腺癌(PC)患者开发特定疾病的 PRO-CTCAE 项目集。

方法

该横断面调查在德国的三个门诊癌症中心进行。使用患者问卷评估 78 项 PRO-CTCAE 症状的流行程度和重要性。为了选择每个肿瘤实体中最相关的 PRO-CTCAE 项目,根据患者的回答对症状进行排名。

结果

共有 101 名 BC 患者、107 名 MM 患者和 66 名 PC 患者参与了研究。最终的项目集分别包含 21 个症状(BC)或 19 个症状(MM 和 PC)。有 8 个症状(疲劳、肌肉疼痛、失眠、关节疼痛、全身疼痛、头晕、呼吸急促和肿胀)在三个项目集中均有体现。疲劳是所有项目集中排名最高的症状,其次是失眠。在仅一个项目集中出现的症状中,与 PC 项目集相关的是泌尿系统症状,与 BC 项目集相关的是视力模糊,与 MM 项目集相关的是食欲减退。

结论

基于患者在症状谱和感知方面的差异,为德国患者群体开发了针对这三种肿瘤实体的个体化 PRO-CTCAE 项目集。新编译的项目集的质量和心理计量学标准应在验证研究中进行评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02cd/10320985/9948bd8e5b40/12885_2023_11115_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02cd/10320985/361c9780c7f8/12885_2023_11115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02cd/10320985/9948bd8e5b40/12885_2023_11115_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02cd/10320985/361c9780c7f8/12885_2023_11115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02cd/10320985/9948bd8e5b40/12885_2023_11115_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing tumor-specific PRO-CTCAE item sets: analysis of a cross-sectional survey in three German outpatient cancer centers.开发针对肿瘤的 PRO-CTCAE 项目集:在三家德国门诊癌症中心的横断面调查分析。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 5;23(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11115-7.
2
Surveillance of Symptom Burden Using the Patient-Reported Outcome Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Patients With Various Types of Cancers During Chemoradiation Therapy: Real-World Study.在放化疗期间,使用患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准的患者报告结局版本对各种癌症患者的症状负担进行监测:真实世界研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 8;9:e44105. doi: 10.2196/44105.
3
Content Validity of Anatomic Site-Specific Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Item Sets for Assessment of Acute Symptomatic Toxicities in Radiation Oncology.解剖部位特异性患者报告结局版常见不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)用于评估放射肿瘤学急性症状毒性的项目集的内容效度。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Sep 1;102(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.048. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
Validation of the German patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE™).德国患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE™)版本的验证。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Dec;27(12):2294-2299. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw422. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Selecting a Subset Based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events for Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring in Lung Cancer Treatment: Mixed Methods Study.基于患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准的肺癌治疗患者报告症状监测版本选择子集:混合方法研究
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Sep 14;7(3):e26574. doi: 10.2196/26574.
6
Acceptability of Routine Evaluations Using Patient-Reported Outcomes of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and Other Patient-Reported Symptom Outcome Tools in Cancer Outpatients: Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience.在癌症门诊患者中使用通用不良事件术语标准和其他患者报告症状结局工具进行常规评估的可接受性:玛格丽特公主癌症中心的经验。
Oncologist. 2019 Nov;24(11):e1219-e1227. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0830. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
7
Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).美国国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的有效性和可靠性。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1051-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639.
8
Evaluating the use of the EORTC patient-reported outcome measures for improving inter-rater reliability of CTCAE ratings in a mixed population of cancer patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估 EORTC 患者报告结局测量在混合癌症患者人群中提高 CTCAE 评分的观察者间可靠性的应用:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Oct 13;21(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04745-w.
9
Validation of the caregiver Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events measure.验证照顾者儿科患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准测量。
Cancer. 2021 May 1;127(9):1483-1494. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33389. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
10
Validity and Reliability of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.儿科患者报告结局通用术语标准不良事件版本的有效性和可靠性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Nov 1;112(11):1143-1152. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa016.

引用本文的文献

1
Symptom experience of patients undergoing treatment for multiple myeloma: a longitudinal real-world electronic patient-reported outcomes study.多发性骨髓瘤治疗患者的症状体验:一项纵向真实世界电子患者报告结局研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 18;32(12):802. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08985-3.
2
[Patient-reported outcomes-the role of the patient's subjective perspective for research and clinical care].[患者报告的结局——患者主观视角在研究和临床护理中的作用]
Urologie. 2024 Sep;63(9):886-892. doi: 10.1007/s00120-024-02405-4. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Selecting a PRO-CTCAE-based subset for patient-reported symptom monitoring in prostate cancer patients: a modified Delphi procedure.基于 PRO-CTCAE 的前列腺癌患者报告症状监测子集选择:一项改良 Delphi 程序。
ESMO Open. 2023 Feb;8(1):100775. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100775. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
2
Selecting a Subset Based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events for Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring in Lung Cancer Treatment: Mixed Methods Study.基于患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准的肺癌治疗患者报告症状监测版本选择子集:混合方法研究
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Sep 14;7(3):e26574. doi: 10.2196/26574.
3
Clinicians versus patients subjective adverse events assessment: based on patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE).
临床医生与患者主观不良事件评估:基于患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3009-3015. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02558-7. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
4
Patient-reported outcomes item selection for bladder cancer patients in chemo- or immunotherapy.化疗或免疫治疗中膀胱癌患者的患者报告结局指标选择
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Aug 22;3(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0141-2.
5
Selection of patient reported outcomes questions reflecting symptoms for patients with metastatic melanoma receiving immunotherapy.为接受免疫治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者选择反映症状的患者报告结局问题。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Mar 21;3(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0111-8.
6
Two-Year Survival Comparing Web-Based Symptom Monitoring vs Routine Surveillance Following Treatment for Lung Cancer.基于网络的症状监测与常规监测在肺癌治疗后两年生存比较。
JAMA. 2019 Jan 22;321(3):306-307. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18085.
7
Integrating the patient voice with clinician reports to identify a hepatocellular carcinoma-specific subset of treatment-related symptomatic adverse events.整合患者反馈与临床医生报告,以识别肝细胞癌特异性的治疗相关症状性不良事件亚组。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Aug 22;2:35. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0063-4. eCollection 2017.
8
Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test.临床研究人员的统计学笔记:卡方检验与费舍尔精确检验。
Restor Dent Endod. 2017 May;42(2):152-155. doi: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
9
Validation of the German patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE™).德国患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE™)版本的验证。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Dec;27(12):2294-2299. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw422. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
10
The association between clinician-based common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO): a systematic review.基于临床医生的不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)与患者报告结局(PRO)之间的关联:一项系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Aug;24(8):3669-76. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3297-9. Epub 2016 Jun 3.