Suppr超能文献

平面二极管矩阵用于 SRS 患者特异性 QA 的评估,与 GAFchromic 胶片比较。

Evaluation of a planar diode matrix for SRS patient-specific QA in comparison with GAFchromic films.

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute - Rome, Italy.

Department of Medical Physics, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, Verduno, Italy.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Aug;24(8):e13947. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13947. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We validate the routine use of a two-dimensional (2D) diode matrix for patient specific pre-treatment verification for Cyberknife (CK) stereotactic radiosurgery and to compare it with film dosimetry.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A total of 46 patients were selected according to the most frequent diseases treated at our institution with the CK system, that is, brain metastases, meningiomas, spine metastases, and prostate tumors. All cases were evaluated with GAFChromic EBT-3 films and SRS MapCHECK for Fixed cone, IRIS, and MLC collimators of the CK.

RESULTS

The highest mean passing rate was observed for the SRS MapCHECK system compared to films. In order to assess if the two techniques provide statistically different results, a Wilcoxon Signed-Rank non-parametric test was performed (p < 0.05) and we found gamma values significantly lower for EBT-3 films with respect to the SRS MapCHECK. We noticed a moderately significant association between the two techniques using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs > 0.4). We also performed the Bland-Altman statistical method: less than 5% of the differences resulted outside the range (mean ± 1.96 × SD), so the two methods can be considered interchangeable within the combined inaccuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SRS MapCHECK for CK patient specific quality assurance (QA) is feasible for a variety of clinical districts and could be reliably used as a replacement for radiochromic films.

摘要

目的

验证二维(2D)二极管矩阵在 Cyberknife(CK)立体定向放射外科中用于患者特定的治疗前验证的常规应用,并将其与胶片剂量学进行比较。

材料与方法

根据我们机构最常治疗的疾病,即脑转移瘤、脑膜瘤、脊柱转移瘤和前列腺肿瘤,选择了总共 46 名患者。所有病例均使用 GAFChromic EBT-3 胶片和 SRS MapCHECK 进行评估,用于 CK 的固定锥形、IRIS 和 MLC 准直器。

结果

SRS MapCHECK 系统的平均通过率最高。为了评估这两种技术是否提供统计学上不同的结果,我们进行了 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验(p<0.05),发现 EBT-3 胶片的伽马值明显低于 SRS MapCHECK。我们使用 Spearman 等级相关系数(rs>0.4)发现这两种技术之间存在中度显著相关性。我们还进行了 Bland-Altman 统计方法:不到 5%的差异超出范围(均值±1.96×SD),因此这两种方法在组合误差内可以互换使用。

结论

SRS MapCHECK 可用于 CK 患者特定的质量保证(QA),适用于各种临床环境,可以可靠地替代放射色胶片。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4315/10402681/17992973d008/ACM2-24-e13947-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验