Suppr超能文献

用于预测故意和非故意中毒风险因素的机器学习算法比较。

Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict intentional and unintentional poisoning risk factors.

作者信息

Veisani Yousef, Sayyadi Hojjat, Sahebi Ali, Moradi Ghobad, Mohamadian Fathola, Delpisheh Ali

机构信息

Psychosocial Injuries Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.

Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Jun 24;9(6):e17337. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17337. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A major share of poisoning cases are perpetrated intentionally, but this varies depending on different geographical regions, age spectrums, and gender distribution. The present study was conducted to determine the most important factors affecting intentional and unintentional poisonings using machine learning algorithms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current cross-sectional study was conducted on 658 people hospitalized due to poisoning. The enrollment and follow-up of patients were carried out during 2020-2021. The data obtained from patients' files and during follow-up were recorded by a physician and entered into SPSS software by the registration expert. Different machine learning algorithms were used to analyze the data. Fit models of the training data were assessed by determining accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F-measure, and the area under the rock curve (AUC). Finally, after analyzing the models, the data of the Gradient boosted trees (GBT) model were finalized.

RESULTS

The GBT model rendered the highest accuracy (91.5 ± 3.4) among other models tested. Also, the GBT model had significantly higher sensitivity (94.7 ± 1.7) and specificity (93.2 ± 4.1) compared to other models (P < 0.001). The most prominent predictors based on the GBT model were the route of poison entry (weight = 0.583), place of residence (weight = 0.137), history of psychiatric diseases (weight = 0.087), and age (weight = 0.085).

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests the GBT model as a reliable predictor model for identifying the factors affecting intentional and unintentional poisoning. According to our results, the determinants of intentional poisoning included the route of poison entry into the body, place of residence, and the heart rate. The most important predictors of unintentional poisoning were age, exposure to benzodiazepine, creatinine levels, and occupation.

摘要

引言

中毒病例中很大一部分是故意造成的,但这因不同的地理区域、年龄范围和性别分布而异。本研究旨在使用机器学习算法确定影响故意中毒和非故意中毒的最重要因素。

材料与方法

本横断面研究对658名因中毒住院的患者进行。患者的纳入和随访在2020年至2021年期间进行。从患者病历和随访期间获得的数据由一名医生记录,并由注册专家输入SPSS软件。使用不同的机器学习算法分析数据。通过确定准确性、敏感性、特异性、F值和岩石曲线下面积(AUC)来评估训练数据的拟合模型。最后,在分析模型后,确定梯度提升树(GBT)模型的数据。

结果

在测试的其他模型中,GBT模型的准确性最高(91.5±3.4)。此外,与其他模型相比,GBT模型的敏感性(94.7±1.7)和特异性(93.2±4.1)显著更高(P<0.001)。基于GBT模型,最突出的预测因素是毒物进入途径(权重=0.583)、居住地点(权重=0.137)、精神疾病史(权重=0.087)和年龄(权重=0.085)。

结论

本研究表明GBT模型是一种可靠的预测模型,用于识别影响故意中毒和非故意中毒的因素。根据我们的结果,故意中毒的决定因素包括毒物进入身体的途径、居住地点和心率。非故意中毒的最重要预测因素是年龄、接触苯二氮卓类药物、肌酐水平和职业。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4336/10320267/cda58a97583d/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验