An initial genomic blueprint of the healthy human oesophageal microbiome.

BACKGROUND

The oesophageal microbiome is thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of oesophageal cancer. However, investigations using culture and molecular barcodes have provided only a low-resolution view of this important microbial community. We therefore explored the potential of culturomics and metagenomic binning to generate a catalogue of reference genomes from the healthy human oesophageal microbiome, alongside a comparison set from saliva.

RESULTS

Twenty-two distinct colonial morphotypes from healthy oesophageal samples were genome-sequenced. These fell into twelve species clusters, eleven of which represented previously defined species. Two isolates belonged to a novel species, which we have named . We performed metagenomic binning of reads generated from UK samples from this study alongside reads generated from Australian samples in a recent study. Metagenomic binning generated 136 medium or high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). MAGs were assigned to 56 species clusters, eight representing novel species which we have named . Granulicatella gullae, . Streptococcus gullae, . Nanosynbacter quadramensis, . Nanosynbacter gullae, . Nanosynbacter colneyensis, . Nanosynbacter norwichensis, . Nanosynococcus oralis and . Haemophilus gullae. Five of these novel species belong to the recently described phylum . Although members of the are known to inhabit the oral cavity, this is the first report of their presence in the oesophagus. Eighteen of the metagenomic species were, until recently, identified only by hard-to-remember alphanumeric placeholder designations. Here we illustrate the utility of a set of recently published arbitrary Latinate species names in providing user-friendly taxonomic labels for microbiome analyses.Our non-redundant species catalogue contained 63 species derived from cultured isolates or MAGs. Mapping revealed that these species account for around half of the sequences in the oesophageal and saliva metagenomes. Although no species was present in all oesophageal samples, 60 species occurred in at least one oesophageal metagenome from either study, with 50 identified in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery of genomes and discovery of new species represents an important step forward in our understanding of the oesophageal microbiome. The genes and genomes that we have released into the public domain will provide a base line for future comparative, mechanistic and intervention studies.