• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吸引力在两种文化中对直接和间接的面部评价有差异影响。

Attractiveness Differentially Affects Direct Versus Indirect Face Evaluations in Two Cultures.

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.

Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2023 Jul-Sep;21(3):14747049231186119. doi: 10.1177/14747049231186119.

DOI:10.1177/14747049231186119
PMID:37428141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10355303/
Abstract

Although decades of research have identified facial features relating to people's evaluations of faces, specific features have largely been examined in isolation from each other. Recent work shows that considering the relative importance of these features in face evaluations is important to test theoretical assumptions of impression formation. Here, we examined how two facial features of evolutionary interest, facial attractiveness and facial-width-to-height ratio (FWHR), relate to evaluations of faces across two cultures. Because face evaluations are typically directly measured via self-reports, we also examined whether these features exert differential effects on both direct and indirect face evaluations. Evaluations of standardized photos naturally varying in facial attractiveness and FWHR were collected using the Affect Misattribution Procedure in the United States and Turkey. When their relative contributions were considered in the same model, facial attractiveness, but not FWHR, related to face evaluations across cultures. This positive attractiveness effect was stronger for direct versus indirect evaluations across cultures. These findings highlight the importance of considering the relative contributions of facial features to evaluations across cultures and suggest a culturally invariant role of attractiveness when intentionally evaluating faces.

摘要

尽管几十年来的研究已经确定了与人们对面部评价相关的面部特征,但这些特定的特征在很大程度上彼此孤立地进行了研究。最近的研究表明,考虑这些特征在面部评价中的相对重要性对于检验印象形成的理论假设很重要。在这里,我们研究了两种具有进化意义的面部特征,面部吸引力和面部宽高比(FWHR),如何与来自两个文化的面部评价相关。由于面部评价通常是通过自我报告直接测量的,我们还研究了这些特征是否对面部的直接和间接评价产生不同的影响。使用美国和土耳其的情感归因程序,对自然变化的面部吸引力和 FWHR 的标准化照片进行了评价。当在同一个模型中考虑它们的相对贡献时,面部吸引力,但不是 FWHR,与跨文化的面部评价相关。这种积极的吸引力效应在跨文化的直接评价与间接评价之间更强。这些发现强调了在跨文化的评价中考虑面部特征的相对贡献的重要性,并表明吸引力在有意评价面部时具有文化上不变的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828b/10355303/18e50578c828/10.1177_14747049231186119-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828b/10355303/10e72199750a/10.1177_14747049231186119-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828b/10355303/e66952a77e52/10.1177_14747049231186119-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828b/10355303/18e50578c828/10.1177_14747049231186119-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828b/10355303/10e72199750a/10.1177_14747049231186119-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828b/10355303/e66952a77e52/10.1177_14747049231186119-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828b/10355303/18e50578c828/10.1177_14747049231186119-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Attractiveness Differentially Affects Direct Versus Indirect Face Evaluations in Two Cultures.吸引力在两种文化中对直接和间接的面部评价有差异影响。
Evol Psychol. 2023 Jul-Sep;21(3):14747049231186119. doi: 10.1177/14747049231186119.
2
Modeling individual preferences reveals that face beauty is not universally perceived across cultures.建模个体偏好表明,面部之美并非在所有文化中都被普遍感知。
Curr Biol. 2021 May 24;31(10):2243-2252.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.013. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: the role of ethnicity and gender.面部吸引力偏好的跨文化一致性:种族和性别的作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 2;9(7):e99629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099629. eCollection 2014.
4
The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.男子气概悖论:面部阳刚之气与胡须相互作用,决定女性对男性面部吸引力的评分。
J Evol Biol. 2016 Nov;29(11):2311-2320. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12958. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
5
Investigating the effect of wearing the hijab: Perception of facial attractiveness by Emirati Muslim women living in their native Muslim country.研究戴头巾的影响:在母国居住的阿联酋穆斯林女性对面部吸引力的看法。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 5;13(10):e0199537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199537. eCollection 2018.
6
Attention Alters Perceived Attractiveness.注意改变感知吸引力。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Apr;27(4):563-71. doi: 10.1177/0956797616630964. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
7
Morphological quantitative criteria and aesthetic evaluation of eight female Han face types.八种女性汉族面型的形态学定量标准和美学评价。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;37(2):445-53. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0081-9. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
8
Face inversion increases attractiveness.面部倒置会增加吸引力。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Jul;178:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 27.
9
Locating attractiveness in the face space: faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype.在面部空间中定位吸引力:面部越接近其群体原型就越具吸引力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Jun;15(3):615-22. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.615.
10
Facial attractiveness.面部吸引力。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2014 Nov;5(6):621-634. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1316. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
People attribute humanness to men and women differently based on their facial appearance.人们根据面部特征对男性和女性的人性化程度有不同的看法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Aug;123(2):400-422. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000364. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
2
Configural face processing impacts race disparities in humanization and trust.构型面孔加工影响人性化和信任方面的种族差异。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017 Nov;73:111-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
The Bogazici face database: Standardized photographs of Turkish faces with supporting materials.
博阿齐奇面部数据库:带有辅助材料的土耳其人面部标准化照片。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 14;13(2):e0192018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192018. eCollection 2018.
4
Facial First Impressions Across Culture: Data-Driven Modeling of Chinese and British Perceivers' Unconstrained Facial Impressions.跨文化的面部第一印象:中国和英国观察者无约束面部印象的数据分析模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Apr;44(4):521-537. doi: 10.1177/0146167217744194. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
5
Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Does Not Predict Self-Reported Behavioral Tendencies.面部宽高比不能预测自我报告的行为倾向。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1675-1682. doi: 10.1177/0956797617716929. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
6
Facing humanness: Facial width-to-height ratio predicts ascriptions of humanity.直面人性:面宽高比预测人类属性的归因。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Jan;114(1):75-94. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000110. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
7
Holistic Processing in the Composite Task Depends on Face Size.复合任务中的整体加工取决于面部大小。
Vis cogn. 2015;23(5):533-545. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2015.1049678. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
Prenatal testosterone exposure is related to sexually dimorphic facial morphology in adulthood.产前睾酮暴露与成年期的两性面部形态有关。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Oct 7;282(1816):20151351. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1351.
9
Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.面部宽高比作为一种进化而来的威胁线索的Meta分析证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 16;10(7):e0132726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132726. eCollection 2015.
10
Facial Trustworthiness Predicts Extreme Criminal-Sentencing Outcomes.面部可信度可预测极端刑事量刑结果。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1325-31. doi: 10.1177/0956797615590992. Epub 2015 Jul 10.