• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《为老年痴呆症患者提供更多的家庭和社区服务后,医疗补助支持下的养老院使用变化》。

Changes in Nursing Home Use Following Medicaid-Supported Expanded Access to Home- and Community-Based Services for Older Adults With Dementia.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2322520. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22520.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22520
PMID:37428503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10334251/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

New York State's Medicaid managed long-term care (MLTC) program expanded access to home- and community-based services, providing an alternative to nursing home care for people with dementia. Between 2012 and 2015, the state implemented mandatory MLTC for dual Medicare and Medicaid enrollees requiring more than 120 days of community-based long-term care.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes in nursing home use among older adults with dementia following MLTC implementation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used longitudinal data from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019, from the Minimum Data Set and Medicare administrative data. The study sample included New York State Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older with dementia. New York City residents were excluded due to insufficient pre-study period data. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019.

EXPOSURE

Mandatory MLTC enrollment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Longitudinal models were used to evaluate changes in annual days of nursing home use following the staggered implementation of MLTC across 13 regions of the state. Two models were estimated: (1) a logistic regression model for any nursing home use in a given year and (2) a linear regression model of total nursing home days, conditional on any nursing home use. Models included annual event-time indicators specified as years until or since MLTC implementation. To capture MLTC effects for dual enrollees relative to non-dual Medicare enrollees, models included interaction terms for dual enrollment and event-time indicators.

RESULTS

This sample included 463 947 Medicare beneficiaries with dementia who lived in New York State between 2011 and 2019 (50.2% younger than 85 years; 64.4% women). Implementation of MLTC was associated with lower odds of nursing home use among dual enrollees, ranging from 8% lower odds 2 years post implementation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.98]) to 24% lower odds 6 years post implementation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.69-0.84]). Compared with a scenario of no MLTC, MLTC implementation was associated with an 8% reduction in annual days of nursing home use between 2013 and 2019 (mean, -5.6 [95% CI, -6.1 to -5.1] days per year).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this cohort study suggest that implementation of mandatory MLTC in New York State was associated with less nursing home use among dual enrollees with dementia and that MLTC may help prevent or delay nursing home placement among older adults with dementia.

摘要

重要性

纽约州的医疗补助管理长期护理(MLTC)计划扩大了对家庭和社区为基础服务的获取途径,为有痴呆症的人提供了一种替代疗养院护理的选择。2012 年至 2015 年间,该州为需要 120 天以上社区长期护理的双重医疗保险和医疗补助参保者实施了强制性 MLTC。

目的

评估 MLTC 实施后痴呆症老年人对疗养院使用的变化。

设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究使用了 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日来自最低数据集和医疗保险管理数据的纵向数据。研究样本包括纽约州 65 岁及以上患有痴呆症的医疗保险受益人。由于研究前期间的数据不足,排除了纽约市居民。数据分析于 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日进行。

暴露情况

强制性 MLTC 登记。

主要结果和措施

使用纵向模型评估了在该州 13 个地区分阶段实施 MLTC 后,每年在疗养院使用的天数的变化。估计了两种模型:(1)用于给定年份任何疗养院使用的逻辑回归模型,以及(2)有任何疗养院使用的情况下,疗养院使用总天数的线性回归模型,条件是有任何疗养院使用。模型包括指定为 MLTC 实施前或实施后年数的年度事件时间指标。为了捕捉 MLTC 对双重参保者相对于非双重医疗保险参保者的影响,模型包括了双重参保和事件时间指标的交互项。

结果

本样本包括 2011 年至 2019 年间居住在纽约州的 463947 名患有痴呆症的医疗保险受益人(50.2%年龄小于 85 岁;64.4%为女性)。MLTC 的实施与双重参保者的疗养院使用几率降低相关,从实施后 2 年的 8%的几率降低(调整后的优势比,0.92[95%置信区间,0.86-0.98])到实施后 6 年的 24%的几率降低(调整后的优势比,0.76[95%置信区间,0.69-0.84])。与没有 MLTC 的情况相比,MLTC 的实施与 2013 年至 2019 年期间每年 8%的疗养院使用天数减少相关(平均,每年减少 5.6[95%置信区间,5.1-4.1]天)。

结论和相关性

这项队列研究的结果表明,纽约州强制性 MLTC 的实施与双重参保者的痴呆症疗养院使用减少相关,MLTC 可能有助于预防或延迟老年痴呆症患者的疗养院安置。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6897/10334251/2f12df345041/jamanetwopen-e2322520-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6897/10334251/f09e1c41c624/jamanetwopen-e2322520-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6897/10334251/2f12df345041/jamanetwopen-e2322520-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6897/10334251/f09e1c41c624/jamanetwopen-e2322520-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6897/10334251/2f12df345041/jamanetwopen-e2322520-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in Nursing Home Use Following Medicaid-Supported Expanded Access to Home- and Community-Based Services for Older Adults With Dementia.《为老年痴呆症患者提供更多的家庭和社区服务后,医疗补助支持下的养老院使用变化》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2322520. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22520.
2
Assessment of Rural-Urban Differences in Health Care Use and Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementia.评估 Medicare 受益人群中阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆患者的城乡医疗保健使用和生存差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2022111. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22111.
3
New York State's Medicaid-only managed long-term care program.纽约州仅针对医疗补助计划的管理式长期护理项目。
Policy Brief (Cent Home Care Policy Res). 2001(8):1-6.
4
Associations Between Use of Paid Help and Care Experiences Among Medicare-Medicaid Enrolled Older Adults With and Without Dementia.在患有和不患有痴呆症的 Medicare-Medicaid 参保老年成年人中,使用付费帮助与护理体验之间的关联。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Dec 29;77(12):e216-e225. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac072.
5
Outcomes of Medicaid home- and community-based long-term services relative to nursing home care among dual eligibles.医疗保险居家和社区长期服务在双重资格人群中的护理院护理的结果。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55(6):973-982. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13573.
6
Nursing home admissions for persons with dementia: Role of home- and community-based services.疗养院收治痴呆症患者:家庭和社区服务的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1168-1178. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13715. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
The effects of state-level expenditures for home- and community-based services on the risk of becoming a long-stay nursing home resident after hip fracture.州级家庭和社区服务支出对髋部骨折后成为长期疗养院居民风险的影响。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3327-3. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
8
Evaluation of Medicaid managed care. Satisfaction, access, and use.医疗补助管理式医疗评估。满意度、可及性与使用情况。
JAMA. 1996 Jul 3;276(1):50-5.
9
The influence of hospice use on nursing home and hospital use in assisted living among dual-eligible enrollees.在有双重资格的参保者中,临终关怀的使用对辅助生活护理院和医院使用的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Feb;13(2):189.e9-189.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
10
Home-Delivered Meals and Nursing Home Placement Among People With Self-Reported Dementia: A Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial.居家送餐和养老院安置在自我报告痴呆症患者中的应用:一项初步实用临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2347195. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47195.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging data, technology, and policy to address disparities for persons living with Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease related dementias.利用数据、技术和政策来解决阿尔茨海默病及与阿尔茨海默病相关的痴呆症患者的差异问题。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Apr;21(4):e70186. doi: 10.1002/alz.70186.

本文引用的文献

1
New York State 1115 Demonstration Independent Evaluation: Interim Report.纽约州1115示范项目独立评估:中期报告。
Rand Health Q. 2022 Jun 30;9(3):5. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
2022 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2022 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Apr;18(4):700-789. doi: 10.1002/alz.12638. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
3
Outcomes of Medicaid home- and community-based long-term services relative to nursing home care among dual eligibles.医疗保险居家和社区长期服务在双重资格人群中的护理院护理的结果。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55(6):973-982. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13573.
4
A National Examination Of Long-Term Care Setting, Outcomes, And Disparities Among Elderly Dual Eligibles.老年双重资格者在长期护理环境、结果和差异方面的全国性考察。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jul;38(7):1110-1118. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05409.
5
Rural-Urban Disparities in Access to Home- and Community-Based Services and Supports: Stakeholder Perspectives From 14 States.农村-城市地区在获得家庭和社区服务与支持方面的差距:来自 14 个州的利益相关者观点。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Apr;20(4):503-508.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.120. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Long-Term Services and Supports Use Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries in Rural and Urban Areas.农村和城市地区老年 Medicare 受益人的长期服务和支持使用情况。
Res Aging. 2019 Mar;41(3):241-264. doi: 10.1177/0164027518824117. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
7
Socioeconomic and Geographic Disparities in Accessing Nursing Homes With High Star Ratings.高星级养老院入住机会的社会经济和地理差异。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):852-859.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
8
Comparison of methods to identify long term care nursing home residence with administrative data.利用行政数据识别长期护理养老院入住情况的方法比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 30;17(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2318-9.
9
Rebalance Without the Balance: A Research Note on the Availability of Community-Based Services in Areas Where Nursing Homes Have Closed.失去平衡后的重新平衡:关于养老院关闭地区社区服务可及性的研究笔记
Res Aging. 2017 Jun;39(5):597-611. doi: 10.1177/0164027515622244. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
US Prevalence And Predictors Of Informal Caregiving For Dementia.美国痴呆症非正式照料的患病率及预测因素
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1637-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0510.