Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
BMC Endocr Disord. 2023 Jul 11;23(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01399-y.
To evaluate use of low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) among adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and its impact on quality of life (QOL).
In this single center, cross-sectional survey study with 532 adults with T1D, Food related QOL (FRQOL), LCS specific questionnaire (LCSSQ), Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ), Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), Audit of Diabetes-Dependent QOL (AddQOL), Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) questionnaires were administered through RedCAP, a secure, HIPAA-compliant web-based application. Demographics and scores of adults who used LCS in last month (recent users) and others (non-users) were compared. Results were adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration and other parameters.
Of 532 participants (mean age 36 ± 13, 69% female), 99% heard LCS before, 68% used them in the last month, 73% reported better glucose control with LCS use and 63% reported no health concerns about LCS use. Recent LCS users were older and had a longer diabetes duration and more complications (hypertension, or any complication) than non-users. However, A1c, AddQOL, T1DAL, FRQOL scores did not differ significantly between recent LCS users and non-users. DSMQ scores, DSMQ management, diet, health care scores did not differ between two groups; however, recent LCS users had lower physical activity score than non-users (p = 0.001).
Most of the adults with T1D have used LCS and perceived that LCS use improved their QOL and glycemic control; however, these were not verified with questionnaires. There was no difference in QOL questionnaires except DSMQ physical activity between recent LCS users and not users with T1D. However, more patients in need to increase their QOL may be using LCS; therefore, associations between the exposure and outcome can be bi-directional.
评估 1 型糖尿病(T1D)成人中低热量甜味剂(LCS)的使用情况及其对生活质量(QOL)的影响。
在这项单中心、横断面调查研究中,共有 532 名 T1D 成人参与,通过 RedCAP 系统(一种安全的、符合 HIPAA 标准的网络应用程序)进行了与食物相关的生活质量(FRQOL)、LCS 专用问卷(LCSSQ)、糖尿病自我管理问卷(DSMQ)、食物频率问卷(FFQ)、糖尿病相关生活质量评估(AddQOL)、1 型糖尿病和生活(T1DAL)问卷的调查。比较了过去一个月内使用(近期使用者)和未使用(非使用者)LCS 的成年人的人口统计学数据和得分。结果根据年龄、性别、糖尿病病程等参数进行了调整。
在 532 名参与者中(平均年龄 36±13 岁,69%为女性),99%听说过 LCS,68%在过去一个月内使用过 LCS,73%报告 LCS 使用改善了血糖控制,63%报告 LCS 使用没有健康问题。近期 LCS 用户比非使用者年龄更大,糖尿病病程更长,并发症更多(高血压或任何并发症)。然而,A1c、AddQOL、T1DAL、FRQOL 评分在近期 LCS 用户和非使用者之间没有显著差异。DMSQ 评分、DMSQ 管理、饮食、医疗保健评分在两组之间没有差异;然而,近期 LCS 用户的体力活动评分低于非使用者(p=0.001)。
大多数 T1D 成人都使用过 LCS,他们认为 LCS 使用提高了他们的 QOL 和血糖控制;然而,这些并没有通过问卷得到验证。在近期 LCS 用户和非使用者之间,除了 DMSQ 体力活动外,其他 QOL 问卷没有差异。然而,可能有更多需要提高生活质量的患者正在使用 LCS;因此,暴露和结果之间的关联可能是双向的。