Suppr超能文献

当前马蹄内翻足治疗的见解:来自黎巴嫩的报告数据。

An Insight on Current Clubfoot Management: A Reported Data From Lebanon.

作者信息

Zeaiter Zeinab, Alzein Hassan, Daher Youssef

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Lebanese University Faculty of Medicine, Beirut, LBN.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Lebanese University Faculty of Medicine, Beirut, LBN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jun 9;15(6):e40194. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40194. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Clubfoot, which has been reported in the literature since the time of Hippocrates in 400 BC, is regarded as one of the most difficult congenital orthopedic anomalies, with a high relapse incidence of 16.87 infants per 10,000 births. The Lebanese region holds limited data concerning the evolution of clubfoot management. Herein, we aim to present novel findings in the treatment of clubfoot without surgical intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center, cross-sectional research included 300 patients with virgin idiopathic clubfoot treated at our facility from 2015 to 2020. The Pirani and DiMeglio Scores were used to determine the severity of the illness prior to treatment, and the DiMeglio Score was used to determine the severity of the disease after treatment. For data analysis, the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM-Version 26; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used and results with p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Our study included 300 patients, with 188 boys (62.7%) and 112 girls (37.3%). The mean age of the patients' onset was 32 days. We recorded an average initial Pirani score of 4.27 ± 0.65 and an average initial DiMeglio score of 11.58 ± 2.56 (62 out of 300) while the average final DiMeglio score was 2.17 ± 1.82. The mean number of casts was 5 ± 0.8, with a minimum of four and a maximum of six casts. The prevalence of relapse was 20.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clubfoot remains a challenging deformity with a high rate of treatment failure and recurrence. While the superiority of Ponseti's technique in terms of success rate could not be disputed, tailored therapy based on the patient's socioeconomic status is considered critical for compliance and treatment success.

摘要

背景/目的:自公元前400年希波克拉底时代起,文献中就有关于马蹄内翻足的记载,它被视为最难治疗的先天性骨科畸形之一,每10000例出生婴儿中复发率高达16.87例。黎巴嫩地区关于马蹄内翻足治疗进展的数据有限。在此,我们旨在展示非手术干预治疗马蹄内翻足的新发现。

材料与方法

这项单中心横断面研究纳入了2015年至2020年在我们机构接受治疗的300例原发性特发性马蹄内翻足患者。治疗前使用皮拉尼评分和迪梅廖评分来确定疾病严重程度,治疗后使用迪梅廖评分来确定疾病严重程度。数据分析采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS,IBM版本26;IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克),p值<0.05的结果被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

我们的研究包括300例患者,其中188例为男孩(62.7%),112例为女孩(37.3%)。患者发病的平均年龄为32天。我们记录到初始皮拉尼评分平均为4.27±0.65,初始迪梅廖评分平均为11.58±2.56(300例中有62例),而最终迪梅廖评分平均为2.17±1.82。石膏固定的平均次数为5±0.8次,最少4次,最多6次。复发率为20.7%。

结论

马蹄内翻足仍然是一种具有挑战性的畸形,治疗失败和复发率很高。虽然庞塞蒂技术在成功率方面的优越性无可争议,但根据患者社会经济状况制定个性化治疗方案对于依从性和治疗成功至关重要。

相似文献

1
An Insight on Current Clubfoot Management: A Reported Data From Lebanon.
Cureus. 2023 Jun 9;15(6):e40194. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40194. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Use of Ankle Dorsiflexion and the Dimeglio and Pirani Scores in Predicting Relapse of Clubfoot Treated With the Ponseti Method.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 Mar-Apr;62(2):218-221. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.06.011. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
Correlation of Pirani and Dimeglio scores with number of Ponseti casts required for clubfoot correction.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Sep;34(6):639-42. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000182.
7
Correlation of age and severity scores to the number of Ponseti casts in Indian infants with clubfeet.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Oct;11(Suppl 5):S807-S811. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
8
Ponseti's vs. Kite's method in the treatment of clubfoot--a prospective randomised study.
Int Orthop. 2008 Jun;32(3):409-13. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0332-y. Epub 2007 Feb 24.
9
Comparison of Ponseti and Kite's method of treatment for idiopathic clubfoot.
Indian J Orthop. 2010 Apr;44(2):202-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.61941.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Clubfoot management in the Middle East: a survey-based review.
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(13):1106. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-33.
2
The influence of laterality, sex and family history on clubfoot severity.
J Child Orthop. 2020 Apr 1;14(2):145-150. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.190184.
3
Clubfoot for the primary care physician: frequently asked questions.
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020 Feb;32(1):100-106. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000860.
4
National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014.
Birth Defects Res. 2019 Nov 1;111(18):1420-1435. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1589. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
6
Are bilateral idiopathic clubfeet more severe than unilateral feet? A severity and treatment analysis.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(2):2309499018772364. doi: 10.1177/2309499018772364.
7
History of clubfoot treatment; part III (twentieth century): back to the future.
Int Orthop. 2017 Nov;41(11):2407-2414. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3629-5. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
9
History of clubfoot treatment, part I: From manipulation in antiquity to splint and plaster in Renaissance before tenotomy.
Int Orthop. 2017 Aug;41(8):1693-1704. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3487-1. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
10
The clubfoot over the centuries.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017 Mar;26(2):143-151. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000350.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验