MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Sep 11;32(5):1979-2020. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00230. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
This study tested the effectiveness of a modified semantic feature analysis (SFA) treatment protocol that incorporated metacognitive strategy training (MST). Regarding its restitutive component, SFA most reliably results in improved word retrieval for treated items and untreated, semantically related items, but evidence of response generalization is often small/inconsistent. Regarding its substitutive component, SFA is thought to facilitate successful communication via habituation of the SFA circumlocution strategy. However, repeated practice with SFA's strategy in the absence of direct MST may not result in independent strategy use and/or generalization. Furthermore, people with aphasia's independent use of the SFA strategy in moments of anomia is presently underreported. To address these limitations, we incorporated MST into SFA and directly measured substitutive outcomes.
Four people with aphasia participated in 24 treatment sessions of SFA + MST in a single-subject, A-B experimental design with repeated measurements. We measured word retrieval accuracy, strategy use, and explicit strategy knowledge. We calculated effect sizes to measure changes in word retrieval accuracy and strategy use and used visual inspection to assess gains in explicit strategy knowledge from pre- to posttreatment and retention.
Participants achieved marginally small to medium effects in word retrieval accuracy for treated; untreated, semantically related; and untreated, semantically unrelated items and marginally small to large effects in independent strategy use. Explicit strategy knowledge was variable.
Across participants, SFA + MST yielded positive changes in word retrieval accuracy or strategy use, or both. Positive changes in word retrieval accuracy were comparable to other SFA studies. Positive changes in strategy use demonstrate preliminary evidence of this treatment's ability to yield restitutive and substitutive gains. Overall, this study offers preliminary evidence of SFA + MST's effectiveness and highlights the importance of directly measuring SFA's substitutive outcomes, which showed that people with aphasia can respond to this treatment in multiple successful ways-not just improved target word production.
本研究测试了一种改良的语义特征分析(SFA)治疗方案的有效性,该方案纳入了元认知策略训练(MST)。就其补偿性成分而言,SFA 最可靠地提高了治疗项目和未经治疗但语义相关项目的单词检索,但反应概括的证据通常较小/不一致。就其替代性成分而言,SFA 被认为通过 SFA 迂回策略的习惯化来促进成功的交流。然而,在没有直接 MST 的情况下,反复练习 SFA 的策略可能不会导致独立策略的使用和/或概括。此外,目前失语症患者在命名障碍时独立使用 SFA 策略的情况报告较少。为了解决这些限制,我们将 MST 纳入 SFA 并直接测量替代结果。
4 名失语症患者参与了 24 次 SFA+MST 治疗,采用单次个体 A-B 实验设计,进行重复测量。我们测量了单词检索准确性、策略使用和明确策略知识。我们计算了效果大小,以衡量单词检索准确性和策略使用的变化,并使用视觉检查评估治疗前后和保留期间明确策略知识的收益。
参与者在治疗项目、未经治疗但语义相关项目和未经治疗但语义不相关项目的单词检索准确性方面取得了中等至中等偏上的效果,在独立策略使用方面取得了中等至较大的效果。明确的策略知识是可变的。
在所有参与者中,SFA+MST 在单词检索准确性或策略使用方面或两者都产生了积极的变化。单词检索准确性的积极变化与其他 SFA 研究相当。策略使用的积极变化证明了这种治疗方法产生补偿和替代收益的初步证据。总的来说,这项研究提供了 SFA+MST 有效性的初步证据,并强调了直接测量 SFA 的替代结果的重要性,这表明失语症患者可以通过多种成功的方式对这种治疗做出反应,而不仅仅是提高目标单词的产生。