Suppr超能文献

膝骨关节炎疼痛伴或不伴中枢敏化人群关节内注射布比卡因的镇痛反应是否存在差异?一项可行性随机对照试验方案。

Is there a difference in the analgesic response to intra-articular bupivacaine injection in people with knee osteoarthritis pain with or without central sensitisation? Protocol of a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Radiological Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 11;13(7):e072138. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072138.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pain is the main symptom of osteoarthritis (OA) with approximately 50% of patients reporting moderate-to-severe pain. Total knee replacement (TKR) is the ultimate treatment option to alleviate pain in knee OA. Nevertheless, TKR does not provide complete relief for all as approximately 20% of patients experience chronic postoperative pain. Painful peripheral stimuli may alter the central nociceptive pathways leading to central sensitisation that can influence treatment response in patients with OA. Currently, there is no objective protocol for detecting whether a patient will respond to a given treatment. Therefore, there is a need for a better mechanistic understanding of individual factors affecting pain relief, consequently informing personalised treatment guidelines. The purpose of this research is to examine the feasibility of conducting a full-scale mechanistic clinical trial in painful knee OA investigating the analgesic response to intra-articular bupivacaine between those with or without evidence of central sensitisation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Understanding Pain mechanisms in KNEE osteoarthritis (UP-KNEE) study is a feasibility, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomised parallel study in participants with radiographically defined knee OA and with self-reported chronic knee pain. The study involves the following assessments: (1) a suite of psychometric questionnaires; (2) quantitative sensory testing; (3) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the knee and brain; (4) a 6-minute walk test; and (5) an intra-articular injection of bupivacaine or placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%) into the index knee. Assessments will be repeated post intra-articular injection apart from the MRI scan of the knee. Our aim is to provide proof of concept and descriptive statistics to power a future mechanistic trial.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Research Authority (HRA) (REC: 20/EM/0287). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. The results will also be shared with lay audiences through relevant channels, such as Pain Centre Versus Arthritis website and patient advocacy groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05561010.

摘要

简介

疼痛是骨关节炎(OA)的主要症状,约 50%的患者报告有中重度疼痛。全膝关节置换术(TKR)是缓解膝骨关节炎疼痛的最终治疗选择。然而,并非所有患者都能完全缓解疼痛,约 20%的患者会出现慢性术后疼痛。疼痛的外周刺激可能会改变中枢敏化的中枢痛觉通路,从而影响 OA 患者的治疗反应。目前,尚无检测患者对特定治疗是否有反应的客观方案。因此,需要更好地了解影响疼痛缓解的个体因素的机制,从而为个性化治疗指南提供信息。本研究旨在探讨在有或没有中枢敏化证据的疼痛性膝骨关节炎患者中,进行全关节内布比卡因镇痛反应的机制性临床试验的可行性。

方法和分析

理解膝关节骨关节炎疼痛机制(UP-KNEE)研究是一项在影像学定义的膝骨关节炎且有慢性膝关节疼痛的患者中进行的可行性、双盲、安慰剂对照随机平行研究。该研究包括以下评估:(1)一整套心理测量问卷;(2)定量感觉测试;(3)膝关节和大脑的磁共振成像(MRI)扫描;(4)6 分钟步行测试;(5)膝关节内注射布比卡因或安慰剂(0.9%氯化钠)。除膝关节 MRI 扫描外,注射后将重复评估。我们的目标是提供概念验证和描述性统计数据,为未来的机制试验提供动力。

伦理和传播

健康研究管理局(HRA)已获得伦理批准(REC:20/EM/0287)。结果将通过同行评审期刊和科学会议进行传播。结果还将通过相关渠道(如疼痛中心对抗关节炎网站和患者倡导团体)与普通受众分享。

试验注册号

NCT05561010。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7531/10347485/bcaf95c92993/bmjopen-2023-072138f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验