Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 100 S. Los Robles Ave., Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jul 12;31(8):461. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07922-0.
Implementation of guideline-recommended depression screening in oncology presents numerous challenges. Implementation strategies that are responsive to local context may be critical elements of adoption and sustainment. We evaluated barriers and facilitators to implementation of a depression screening program for breast cancer patients in a community medical oncology setting as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we employed qualitative methods to evaluate clinician, administrator, and patient perceptions of the program using semi-structured interviews. We used a team-coding approach for the data; thematic development focused on barriers and facilitators to implementation using a grounded theory approach. The codebook was refined through open discussions of subjectivity and unintentional bias, coding, and memo applications (including emergent coding), and the hierarchical structure and relationships of themes.
We conducted 20 interviews with 11 clinicians/administrators and 9 patients. Five major themes emerged: (1) gradual acceptance and support of the intervention and workflow; (2) compatibility with system and personal norms and goals; (3) reinforcement of the value of and need for adaptability; (4) self-efficacy within the nursing team; and (5) importance of identifying accountable front-line staff beyond leadership "champions."
Findings suggest a high degree of acceptability and feasibility due to the selection of appropriate implementation strategies, alignment of norms and goals, and a high degree of workflow adaptability. These findings will be uniquely helpful in generating actionable, real-world knowledge to inform the design, implementation, and sustainment of guideline-recommended depression screening programs in oncology.
ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02941614.
在肿瘤学中实施指南推荐的抑郁筛查存在诸多挑战。针对当地情况制定的实施策略可能是采用和维持的关键因素。我们评估了在社区肿瘤医学环境中为乳腺癌患者实施抑郁筛查计划的实施障碍和促进因素,这是一项集群随机对照试验的一部分。
在实施研究综合框架的指导下,我们采用定性方法,使用半结构式访谈评估了临床医生、管理人员和患者对该计划的看法。我们使用团队编码方法对数据进行分析;主题开发侧重于使用扎根理论方法实施的障碍和促进因素。通过对主观性和非有意偏见、编码和备忘录应用(包括新兴编码)以及主题的层次结构和关系进行公开讨论,对代码簿进行了细化。
我们对 11 名临床医生/管理人员和 9 名患者进行了 20 次访谈。出现了五个主要主题:(1)逐渐接受和支持干预和工作流程;(2)与系统和个人规范和目标的兼容性;(3)增强了适应性的价值和必要性;(4)护理团队的自我效能感;以及(5)确定除领导“拥护者”之外的负责一线人员的重要性。
研究结果表明,由于选择了适当的实施策略、规范和目标的一致性以及高度的工作流程适应性,该计划具有很高的可接受性和可行性。这些发现将非常有助于生成可操作的、真实世界的知识,为肿瘤学中指南推荐的抑郁筛查计划的设计、实施和维持提供信息。
ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02941614。