Roemer V M, Kieback D G, Bühler K
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1986 Jun;46(6):340-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035927.
Data from 690 clinics concerning obstetric management and intensive monitoring of the fetus sub partu were classified according to the type of hospital (e. g., municipal clinic, district hospital...) and the size of the hospital based on the number of births per year. On the basis of the annual number of births four groups (I-IV) were formed, each with 172 clinics. While the average number of surgical deliveries (cesarean, forceps, vacuum) is not related to the hospital (Table 3), it is related to the type of hospital (Table 6): the average number of cesarean deliveries is highest in university clinics (n = 24; 14.9%), and on average more forceps (6.5%) than vacuum extractions (5.7%) are performed. In all other hospitals vacuum extraction is clearly preferred (7-8%). The quotient Q of the annual number of births per CTG unit is not constant, but increases with the size of the clinic: In large hospitals (Group IV) significantly more births are monitored with a CTG unit (maximum 607, average 215), so that there is a numerical "monitoring deficit" as compared to smaller departments. The monitoring capability is numerically highest in the university clinics (Q = 147) and lowest in the academic teaching hospitals (Q = 192). The larger the clinic, the more frequently fetal blood is analyzed: the figure in large clinics is 40%. Small clinics are less familiar with this method (approx. 16%). The larger the clinic, the more often intrauterine catheters are used to measure labor; the figure rises from 7% to 29%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
来自690家诊所的关于产时产科管理及胎儿强化监测的数据,根据医院类型(如市立诊所、地区医院……)以及基于每年出生人数的医院规模进行了分类。根据每年的出生人数,形成了四组(I - IV),每组有172家诊所。虽然手术分娩(剖宫产、产钳助产、真空吸引助产)的平均数量与医院无关(表3),但与医院类型有关(表6):大学诊所的剖宫产平均数量最高(n = 24;14.9%),且平均产钳助产(6.5%)比真空吸引助产(5.7%)更多。在所有其他医院,真空吸引助产明显更受青睐(7 - 8%)。每个CTG单元每年的出生人数商Q并非恒定,而是随诊所规模增加:在大型医院(第四组),用CTG单元监测的出生人数显著更多(最多607例,平均215例),因此与较小科室相比存在数字上的“监测不足”。大学诊所的监测能力在数字上最高(Q = 147),学术教学医院最低(Q = 192)。诊所越大,分析胎儿血液的频率越高:大型诊所的这一比例为40%。小型诊所对这种方法不太熟悉(约16%)。诊所越大,使用宫内导管测量产程的频率越高;这一比例从7%升至29%。(摘要截选至250词)