• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区老年人与中风幸存者跌倒风险评估特征的比较分析:基于传感器数据的见解

Comparative Analysis of Fall Risk Assessment Features in Community-Elderly and Stroke Survivors: Insights from Sensor-Based Data.

作者信息

Lee Chia-Hsuan, Mendoza Tomas, Huang Chien-Hua, Sun Tien-Lung

机构信息

Department of Data Science, Soochow University, No. 70, Linxi Road, Shilin District, Taipei 111, Taiwan.

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Yuan Ze University, 135 Yuan Tung Road, Chungli District, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 5;11(13):1938. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131938.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11131938
PMID:37444772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10341555/
Abstract

Fall-risk assessment studies generally focus on identifying characteristics that affect postural balance in a specific group of subjects. However, falls affect a multitude of individuals. Among the groups with the most recurrent fallers are the community-dwelling elderly and stroke survivors. Thus, this study focuses on identifying a set of features that can explain fall risk for these two groups of subjects. Sixty-five community dwelling elderly (forty-nine female, sixteen male) and thirty-five stroke-survivors (twenty-two male, thirteen male) participated in our study. With the use of an inertial sensor, some features are extracted from the acceleration data of a Timed Up and Go (TUG) test performed by both groups of individuals. A short-form berg balance scale (SFBBS) score and the TUG test score were used for labeling the data. With the use of a 100-fold cross-validation approach, Relief-F and Extra Trees Classifier algorithms were used to extract sets of the top 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 features. Random Forest classifiers were trained for each set of features. The best models were selected, and the repeated features for each group of subjects were analyzed and discussed. The results show that only the stand duration was an important feature for the prediction of fall risk across all clinical tests and both groups of individuals.

摘要

跌倒风险评估研究通常侧重于识别影响特定受试者群体姿势平衡的特征。然而,跌倒影响众多个体。跌倒最频繁的群体包括社区居住的老年人和中风幸存者。因此,本研究侧重于识别一组能够解释这两组受试者跌倒风险的特征。65名社区居住的老年人(49名女性,16名男性)和35名中风幸存者(22名男性,13名女性)参与了我们的研究。通过使用惯性传感器,从两组个体进行的定时起立行走(TUG)测试的加速度数据中提取了一些特征。使用简短伯格平衡量表(SFBBS)评分和TUG测试评分对数据进行标注。采用100倍交叉验证方法,使用Relief-F和Extra Trees Classifier算法提取排名前5、10、15、20、25和30的特征集。针对每组特征训练随机森林分类器。选择最佳模型,并对每组受试者重复出现的特征进行分析和讨论。结果表明,在所有临床试验和两组个体中,只有站立持续时间是预测跌倒风险的重要特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bf4/10341555/eca54ada5d97/healthcare-11-01938-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bf4/10341555/7b90e542f657/healthcare-11-01938-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bf4/10341555/f76cb81b8a14/healthcare-11-01938-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bf4/10341555/eca54ada5d97/healthcare-11-01938-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bf4/10341555/7b90e542f657/healthcare-11-01938-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bf4/10341555/f76cb81b8a14/healthcare-11-01938-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bf4/10341555/eca54ada5d97/healthcare-11-01938-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Fall Risk Assessment Features in Community-Elderly and Stroke Survivors: Insights from Sensor-Based Data.社区老年人与中风幸存者跌倒风险评估特征的比较分析:基于传感器数据的见解
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 5;11(13):1938. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131938.
2
Random Forest for Automatic Feature Importance Estimation and Selection for Explainable Postural Stability of a Multi-Factor Clinical Test.随机森林用于多因素临床测试的可解释姿势稳定性的自动特征重要性评估和选择。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 3;21(17):5930. doi: 10.3390/s21175930.
3
Fall Risk Assessment in Stroke Survivors: A Machine Learning Model Using Detailed Motion Data from Common Clinical Tests and Motor-Cognitive Dual-Tasking.脑卒中幸存者跌倒风险评估:使用常见临床测试和运动认知双重任务的详细运动数据的机器学习模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 26;24(3):812. doi: 10.3390/s24030812.
4
Assessing the fall risks of community-dwelling stroke survivors using the Short-form Physiological Profile Assessment (S-PPA).使用简化生理概况评估(S-PPA)评估社区居住的中风幸存者的跌倒风险。
PLoS One. 2019 May 21;14(5):e0216769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216769. eCollection 2019.
5
Incidence and circumstances of falls among community-dwelling ambulatory stroke survivors: A prospective study.社区居住的活动能力 stroke 幸存者跌倒的发生率和情况:一项前瞻性研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 Mar;19(3):240-244. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13594. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
An instrumented timed up and go: the added value of an accelerometer for identifying fall risk in idiopathic fallers.使用仪器测定的起立-行走计时测试:加速度计在识别特发性跌倒者跌倒风险方面的附加价值。
Physiol Meas. 2011 Dec;32(12):2003-18. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/32/12/009. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
7
Assessing elderly's functional balance and mobility via analyzing data from waist-mounted tri-axial wearable accelerometers in timed up and go tests.通过分析老年人在计时起立行走测试中佩戴在腰部的三轴可穿戴加速度计的数据来评估其功能平衡和移动能力。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01463-4.
8
Estimating Postural Stability Using Improved Permutation Entropy via TUG Accelerometer Data for Community-Dwelling Elderly People.通过定时起立行走测试加速计数据,利用改进的排列熵估计社区老年人的姿势稳定性。
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Sep 29;22(10):1097. doi: 10.3390/e22101097.
9
Feature selection for elderly faller classification based on wearable sensors.基于可穿戴传感器的老年人跌倒者分类特征选择
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 May 30;14(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0255-9.
10
Prevention of falls and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling seniors: an evidence-based analysis.社区居住老年人跌倒及跌倒相关伤害的预防:一项基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(2):1-78. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Wobble Board Instability Enhances Compensatory CoP Responses to CoM Movement Across Timescales.摇摆板不稳定性增强了跨时间尺度对质心运动的补偿性压力中心反应。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 17;25(14):4454. doi: 10.3390/s25144454.
2
Gait Monitoring and Analysis: A Mathematical Approach.步态监测与分析:一种数学方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 7;23(18):7743. doi: 10.3390/s23187743.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensor-Based Fall Risk Assessment: A Survey.基于传感器的跌倒风险评估:一项综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 27;9(11):1448. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111448.
2
Fall risk classification for people with lower extremity amputations using random forests and smartphone sensor features from a 6-minute walk test.使用随机森林和智能手机传感器特征对下肢截肢患者进行 6 分钟步行测试的跌倒风险分类。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0247574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247574. eCollection 2021.
3
Development and validation of a robotic multifactorial fall-risk predictive model: A one-year prospective study in community-dwelling older adults.
开发和验证一种机器人多因素跌倒风险预测模型:一项针对社区居住的老年人群体的为期一年的前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0234904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234904. eCollection 2020.
4
Post-stroke patients with moderate function have the greatest risk of falls: a National Cohort Study.中风后中度功能障碍的患者跌倒风险最高:一项全国队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Dec 26;19(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1377-7.
5
Wearable inertial sensors to measure gait and posture characteristic differences in older adult fallers and non-fallers: A scoping review.可穿戴惯性传感器测量老年跌倒者和非跌倒者的步态和姿势特征差异:范围综述。
Gait Posture. 2020 Feb;76:110-121. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.10.039. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
6
Falls in the elderly: assessment of prevalence and risk factors.老年人跌倒:患病率及危险因素评估
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018 Jul-Sep;16(3):1206. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.03.1206. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
7
Relief-based feature selection: Introduction and review.基于缓解的特征选择:介绍与综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Sep;85:189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
8
Wearable Inertial Sensors for Fall Risk Assessment and Prediction in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.可穿戴惯性传感器在老年人跌倒风险评估和预测中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018 Mar;26(3):573-582. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2771383.
9
Balance Problems and Fall Risks in the Elderly.老年人的平衡问题与跌倒风险
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017 Nov;28(4):727-737. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2017.06.006.
10
Risk Factors for Falls in Community Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.社区脑卒中幸存者跌倒的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):563-573.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Aug 7.