• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区分胁迫强度和胁迫持续时间对植物盐胁迫响应的影响。

Distinguishing the Effects of Stress Intensity and Stress Duration in Plant Responses to Salinity.

作者信息

DiCara Caitlin, Gedan Keryn

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Columbian College of Arts & Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.

出版信息

Plants (Basel). 2023 Jul 1;12(13):2522. doi: 10.3390/plants12132522.

DOI:10.3390/plants12132522
PMID:37447083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10346267/
Abstract

Species-specific variation in response to stress is a key driver of ecological patterns. As climate change alters stress regimes, coastal plants are experiencing intensifying salinity stress due to sea-level rise and more intense storms. This study investigates the variation in species' responses to presses and pulses of salinity stress in five glycophytic and five halophytic species to determine whether salinity intensity, duration, or their interaction best explain patterns of survival and performance. In salinity stress exposure experiments, we manipulated the intensity and duration of salinity exposure to challenge species' expected salinity tolerances. Salinity intensity best explained patterns of survival in glycophytic species, while the interaction between intensity and duration was a better predictor of survival in halophytic species. The interaction between intensity and duration also best explained biomass and chlorophyll production for all tested species. There was interspecific variability in the magnitude of the interactive effect of salinity intensity and duration, with some glycophytic species (, , and ) having a more pronounced, negative biomass response. For the majority of species, prolonged stress duration exacerbated the negative effect of salinity intensity on biomass. We also observed an unexpected, compensatory response in chlorophyll production in two species, and , for which the effect of salinity intensity on chlorophyll became more positive with increasing duration. We found the regression coefficient of salinity intensity versus biomass at the highest stress duration, i.e., as a press stressor, to be a useful indicator of salinity tolerance, for which species' salinity-tolerance levels matched those in the literature. In conclusion, by measuring species-specific responses to stress exposure, we were able to visualize the independent and interactive effects of two components of a salinity stress regime, intensity, and duration, to reveal how species' responses vary in magnitude and by tolerance class.

摘要

物种对胁迫反应的特异性差异是生态格局的关键驱动因素。随着气候变化改变胁迫状况,沿海植物因海平面上升和更强烈的风暴而面临日益加剧的盐度胁迫。本研究调查了五个甜土植物物种和五个盐生植物物种对盐度胁迫的压力和脉冲反应的差异,以确定盐度强度、持续时间或它们的相互作用是否最能解释生存和表现模式。在盐度胁迫暴露实验中,我们操纵了盐度暴露的强度和持续时间,以挑战物种预期的盐度耐受性。盐度强度最能解释甜土植物物种的生存模式,而强度和持续时间之间的相互作用则是盐生植物物种生存的更好预测指标。强度和持续时间之间的相互作用也最能解释所有测试物种的生物量和叶绿素产量。盐度强度和持续时间的交互作用大小存在种间变异性,一些甜土植物物种(、和)具有更明显的负生物量反应。对于大多数物种来说,延长胁迫持续时间会加剧盐度强度对生物量的负面影响。我们还在两个物种和中观察到叶绿素产量出现了意想不到的补偿反应,对于这两个物种,随着持续时间的增加,盐度强度对叶绿素的影响变得更加积极。我们发现,在最高胁迫持续时间下,即作为压力胁迫源时,盐度强度与生物量的回归系数是盐度耐受性的一个有用指标,其物种的盐度耐受水平与文献中的水平相符。总之,通过测量物种对胁迫暴露的特异性反应,我们能够直观地看到盐度胁迫状况的两个组成部分——强度和持续时间的独立和交互作用,以揭示物种反应在大小和耐受类别上是如何变化的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/6db5a2743e35/plants-12-02522-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/a0aea6046b7d/plants-12-02522-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/86415a3460ed/plants-12-02522-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/5c61640367d5/plants-12-02522-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/9440c5dfaacf/plants-12-02522-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/6fc1ef9d4fae/plants-12-02522-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/c677ec144511/plants-12-02522-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/f5194e4e1373/plants-12-02522-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/6db5a2743e35/plants-12-02522-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/a0aea6046b7d/plants-12-02522-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/86415a3460ed/plants-12-02522-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/5c61640367d5/plants-12-02522-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/9440c5dfaacf/plants-12-02522-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/6fc1ef9d4fae/plants-12-02522-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/c677ec144511/plants-12-02522-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/f5194e4e1373/plants-12-02522-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c9/10346267/6db5a2743e35/plants-12-02522-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Distinguishing the Effects of Stress Intensity and Stress Duration in Plant Responses to Salinity.区分胁迫强度和胁迫持续时间对植物盐胁迫响应的影响。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jul 1;12(13):2522. doi: 10.3390/plants12132522.
2
Photosynthetic tolerance to non-resource stress influences competition importance and intensity in an invaded estuary.对非资源胁迫的光合作用耐性会影响入侵河口的竞争重要性和强度。
Ecology. 2018 Jun;99(6):1327-1337. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2214. Epub 2018 May 1.
3
Shade and salinity responses of two dominant coastal wetland grasses: implications for light competition at the transition zone.两种优势滨海湿地草本植物的遮荫和盐度响应:对过渡带光照竞争的启示。
Ann Bot. 2021 Sep 3;128(4):469-480. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcab089.
4
Salinity tolerances and use of saline environments by freshwater turtles: implications of sea level rise.淡水龟的耐盐性和对咸水环境的利用:海平面上升的影响。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Aug;93(3):1634-1648. doi: 10.1111/brv.12410. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
5
Phenotypic and physiological responses to salt exposure in Sorghum reveal diversity among domesticated landraces.盐胁迫下高粱表型和生理响应揭示了驯化品种间的多样性。
Am J Bot. 2020 Jul;107(7):983-992. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1506. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
Halophytes can salinize soil when competing with glycophytes, intensifying effects of sea level rise in coastal communities.盐生植物在与甜土植物竞争时会使土壤盐碱化,加剧沿海地区海平面上升的影响。
Oecologia. 2017 Jul;184(3):729-737. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-3896-2. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
7
Cerium oxide nanoparticles improve cotton salt tolerance by enabling better ability to maintain cytosolic K/Na ratio.氧化铈纳米颗粒通过提高细胞溶质 K/Na 比值的维持能力,提高棉花的耐盐性。
J Nanobiotechnology. 2021 May 25;19(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00892-7.
8
Bacillus firmus (SW5) augments salt tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L.) by modulating root system architecture, antioxidant defense systems and stress-responsive genes expression.坚硬芽孢杆菌(SW5)通过调节根系结构、抗氧化防御系统和应激响应基因表达来增强大豆(Glycine max L.)的耐盐性。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018 Nov;132:375-384. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
9
Chloride accumulation in aboveground biomass of three macrophytes (Phragmites australis, Juncus maritimus, and Typha latifolia) depending on their growth stages and salinity exposure: application for Cl removal and phytodesalinization.三种挺水植物(芦苇、海三棱藨草和香蒲)地上生物量中氯的积累取决于其生长阶段和盐度暴露:氯去除和植物脱盐的应用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(23):35284-35299. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17591-3. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
10
[A Contrastive Study on Salt-alkaline Resistance and Removal Efficiency of Nitrogen and Phosphorus by Phragmites australis and Typha angustifolia in Coastal Estuary Area].[芦苇与香蒲对滨海河口区盐碱抗性及氮磷去除效率的对比研究]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2015 Apr;36(4):1489-96.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals That the Photosynthesis and Carotenoid Metabolism Pathway Is Involved in the Salinity Stress Response in L. ssp. .转录组分析表明光合作用和类胡萝卜素代谢途径参与了盐胁迫响应中的盐生杜氏藻(杜氏盐藻的亚种)。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Feb 13;14(4):566. doi: 10.3390/plants14040566.
2
Salinity Stress Tolerance in Plants.植物的耐盐胁迫能力
Plants (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;12(20):3520. doi: 10.3390/plants12203520.

本文引用的文献

1
A conjunctive management framework for the optimal design of pumping and injection strategies to mitigate seawater intrusion.一种联合管理框架,用于优化设计抽注策略以减轻海水入侵。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Mar 15;282:111964. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111964. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Differentially expressed genes related to oxidoreductase activity and glutathione metabolism underlying the adaptation of from the salt marsh in the Yellow River Delta, China.与氧化还原酶活性和谷胱甘肽代谢相关的差异表达基因在中国黄河三角洲盐沼适应过程中的作用。 (你提供的原文表述不太完整准确,可能影响理解,比如“from the salt marsh”前面似乎缺失关键主体信息)
PeerJ. 2020 Oct 2;8:e10024. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10024. eCollection 2020.
3
Salt Tolerance and Na Allocation in under Variable Soil and Water Salinity.
可变土壤和水盐度条件下[具体植物名称未给出]的耐盐性及钠分配
Plants (Basel). 2020 Apr 28;9(5):561. doi: 10.3390/plants9050561.
4
The gathering storm: optimizing management of coastal ecosystems in the face of a climate-driven threat.蓄势待发的风暴:应对气候驱动威胁,优化沿海生态系统管理。
Ann Bot. 2020 Feb 3;125(2):197-212. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz204.
5
Ecophysiological response of native and exotic salt marsh vegetation to waterlogging and salinity: Implications for the effects of sea-level rise.本土和外来盐沼植被对水淹和盐度的生理生态响应:对海平面上升影响的意义。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 5;8(1):2441. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18721-z.
6
Recovery of freshwater marsh vegetation after a saltwater intrusion event.咸水入侵事件后淡水沼泽植被的恢复
Oecologia. 1995 Jul;103(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/BF00328426.
7
Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?生物量是植物适合度的可靠估计指标吗?
Appl Plant Sci. 2017 Feb 14;5(2). doi: 10.3732/apps.1600094. eCollection 2017 Feb.
8
Proteome Dynamics and Physiological Responses to Short-Term Salt Stress in Brassica napus Leaves.甘蓝型油菜叶片蛋白质组动态变化及对短期盐胁迫的生理响应
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 21;10(12):e0144808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144808. eCollection 2015.
9
Towards a theory of ecotone resilience: coastal vegetation on a salinity gradient.迈向生态交错带恢复力理论:盐度梯度上的海岸植被
Theor Popul Biol. 2012 Aug;82(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
10
Biogeography, Competition, and Microclimate: The Barnacle Chthamalus fragilis in New England.生物地理学、竞争与小气候:新英格兰地区的藤壶 Chthamalus fragilis。
Integr Comp Biol. 2002 Aug;42(4):872-80. doi: 10.1093/icb/42.4.872.