• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A risk stratified analysis of the NSQIP database.同时性结直肠癌切除与同时性结直肠癌肝转移:NSQIP数据库的风险分层分析
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;128(7):1095-1105. doi: 10.1002/jso.27393. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
Thirty-Day Morbidity after Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Liver Metastasis: American College of Surgeons NSQIP Analysis.结直肠癌和结直肠肝转移同时切除术后 30 天发病率:美国外科医师学院 NSQIP 分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Apr;230(4):617-627.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.018. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
3
Procedure-specific risks of robotic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.机器人辅助同期结直肠癌与肝转移灶切除术的特定操作风险。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2555-2558. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01659-y. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
4
A NSQIP Review of Major Morbidity and Mortality of Synchronous Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastasis Stratified by Extent of Liver Resection and Type of Colorectal Resection.一项美国国立外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)对结直肠癌肝转移同期肝切除的主要发病率和死亡率的回顾,按肝切除范围和结直肠癌切除类型分层。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Nov;19(11):1982-94. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2895-z. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
5
Simultaneous resections of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a multi-institutional analysis.结直肠癌与同时性肝转移的同期切除术:一项多机构分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;14(12):3481-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9522-5. Epub 2007 Sep 1.
6
Simultaneous Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis: the New Standard of Care?同步切除治疗同时性结直肠癌肝转移:新的治疗标准?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jun;21(6):975-982. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3422-1. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
7
Simultaneous colorectal and hepatic procedures for colorectal cancer result in increased morbidity but equivalent mortality compared with colorectal or hepatic procedures alone: outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.同时进行结直肠和肝脏手术治疗结直肠癌会增加发病率,但与单独进行结直肠或肝脏手术相比,死亡率相当:来自国家手术质量改进计划的结果。
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Sep;15(9):695-702. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12031. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
8
Trends and Outcomes of Synchronous Resection of Colorectal Metastasis in the Modern Era-Analysis of Targeted Hepatic NSQIP Database.现代时代结直肠转移同步切除的趋势和结果——靶向性肝 NSQIP 数据库分析。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jun;238:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
9
Pushing boundaries: simultaneous minimal-invasive resection of complex colorectal liver metastases and its primary tumor.突破界限:复杂结直肠癌肝转移灶及其原发肿瘤的同期微创切除
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):401-408. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11411-8. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
10
Safety and efficacy of synchronous robotic surgery for colorectal cancer with liver metastases.同步机器人手术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的安全性和有效性
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):603-606. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0813-6. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Conversion following minimally invasive attempt at simultaneous colorectal and liver resection does not affect 30-day postoperative overall morbidity.微创同步结直肠癌和肝切除术中转为开腹手术并不影响术后30天的总体发病率。
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jun;27(6):e70128. doi: 10.1111/codi.70128.

本文引用的文献

1
Simultaneous or staged resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases: a 13-year institutional follow-up.同时性或分期性切除结直肠癌肝转移:13 年机构随访。
HPB (Oxford). 2022 Jul;24(7):1091-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.019. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
2
Simultaneous Robot Assisted Colon and Liver Resection for Metastatic Colon Cancer.同期机器人辅助结肠癌和肝转移癌切除术。
JSLS. 2021 Apr-Jun;25(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00108.
3
Simultaneous Resection of Primary Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Liver Metastases: Contemporary Practice, Evidence and Knowledge Gaps.原发性结直肠癌与同步性肝转移瘤的同期切除:当代实践、证据与知识空白
Oncol Ther. 2021 Jun;9(1):111-120. doi: 10.1007/s40487-021-00148-2. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
4
Simultaneous robotic-assisted resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a systematic review.机器人辅助同期结直肠癌和肝转移灶切除术:系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):841-848. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01213-8. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
5
Synchronous resection of colorectal cancer primary and liver metastases: an outcomes analysis.结直肠癌原发灶与肝转移灶同期切除:疗效分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Aug;23(8):1277-1284. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
6
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
7
Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center.机器人与腹腔镜肝手术治疗结直肠癌肝转移:来自德国学术中心的经验
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec 22;18(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-02113-1.
8
Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives.结直肠癌肝转移:当前治疗与未来展望
World J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 24;11(10):761-808. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i10.761.
9
Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between minimally invasive liver resection and open liver resection: a propensity-score matched analysis.微创肝切除术与开腹肝切除术的临床和经济结局比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 May;23(5):785-794. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
10
Thirty-Day Morbidity after Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Liver Metastasis: American College of Surgeons NSQIP Analysis.结直肠癌和结直肠肝转移同时切除术后 30 天发病率:美国外科医师学院 NSQIP 分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Apr;230(4):617-627.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.018. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

同时性结直肠癌切除与同时性结直肠癌肝转移:NSQIP数据库的风险分层分析

Simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A risk stratified analysis of the NSQIP database.

作者信息

Radomski Shannon N, Chen Sophia Y, Stem Miloslawa, Done Joy Z, Efron Jonathan E, Safar Bashar, Atallah Chady

机构信息

Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Department of Surgery, New York University, New York City, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;128(7):1095-1105. doi: 10.1002/jso.27393. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1002/jso.27393
PMID:37448259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10592340/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Over 25% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Controversy exists over the surgical management of these patients. This study aims to investigate the safety of a simultaneous surgical approach by stratifying patients based on procedure risk and operative approach.

METHODS

Using ACS-NSQIP (2016-2020), patients with CRC who underwent isolated colorectal, isolated hepatic, or simultaneous resections were identified. Colorectal and hepatic procedures were stratified by morbidity risk (high vs. low) and operative approach (open vs. minimally invasive). Thirty-day overall morbidity was compared between risk matched isolated and simultaneous resection groups.

RESULTS

A total of 65 417 patients were identified, with 1550 (2.4%) undergoing simultaneous resections. A total of 1207 (77.9%) underwent a low-risk colorectal and low-risk liver resection. On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in overall morbidity between patients who had a simultaneous open high-risk colorectal/low-risk hepatic procedure compared to patients who had an isolated open high-risk colorectal procedure (odds ratio: 1.19; 95% confidence interval: 0.94-1.50; p = 0.148). All other combinations of simultaneous procedures had statistically significant higher rates of morbidity than the isolated group.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous resection of colorectal and synchronous CRLM is associated with an increased risk of morbidity in most circumstances in a risk stratified analysis, although rates of readmission and reoperation were not increased. Minimally invasive surgical approaches may significantly mitigate this morbidity.

摘要

背景与目的

超过25%被诊断为结直肠癌(CRC)的患者会发生结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)。对于这些患者的手术治疗存在争议。本研究旨在通过根据手术风险和手术方式对患者进行分层,探讨同期手术方法的安全性。

方法

利用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP,2016 - 2020年),确定接受单纯结直肠手术、单纯肝脏手术或同期手术的CRC患者。结直肠和肝脏手术按发病风险(高风险与低风险)和手术方式(开放手术与微创手术)进行分层。比较风险匹配的单纯手术组和同期手术组之间的30天总体发病率。

结果

共确定65417例患者,其中1550例(2.4%)接受了同期手术。共有1207例(77.9%)接受了低风险的结直肠和低风险的肝脏切除术。多因素分析显示,同期进行开放高风险结直肠/低风险肝脏手术的患者与接受单纯开放高风险结直肠手术的患者相比,总体发病率无显著差异(比值比:1.19;95%置信区间:0.94 - 1.50;p = 0.148)。同期手术的所有其他组合的发病率在统计学上均显著高于单纯手术组。

结论

在风险分层分析中,多数情况下,同期切除结直肠癌和同步CRLM与发病率增加相关,尽管再次入院和再次手术率并未增加。微创手术方法可能会显著降低这种发病率。