• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区干预对多种疾病患者非计划性医疗保健使用的影响:系统评价。

The effects of community interventions on unplanned healthcare use in patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK.

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 2024 Jan;117(1):24-35. doi: 10.1177/01410768231186224. Epub 2023 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1177/01410768231186224
PMID:37449474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10858714/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the impact of community-based interventions for multimorbid patients on unplanned healthcare use. The prevalence of multimorbidity (co-existence of multiple chronic conditions) is rapidly increasing and affects one-third of the global population. Patients with multimorbidity have complex healthcare needs and greater unplanned healthcare usage. Community-based interventions allow for continued care of patients outside hospitals, but few studies have explored the effects of these interventions on unplanned healthcare usage.

DESIGN

A systematic review was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Cochrane Library online databases were searched. Studies were screened and underwent risk of bias assessment. Data were synthesised using narrative synthesis.

SETTING

Community-based interventions.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with multimorbidity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Unplanned healthcare usage.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies, including a total of 6148 participants, were included. All included studies came from high-income settings and had elderly populations. All studies measured emergency department attendances as their primary outcome. Risk of bias was generally low. Most community interventions were multifaceted with emphasis on education, self-monitoring of symptoms and regular follow-ups. Four studies looked at improved care coordination, advance care planning and palliative care. All 13 studies found a decrease in emergency department visits post-intervention with risk reduction ranging from 0 (95% confidencec interval [CI]: -0.37 to 0.37) to 0.735 (95% CI: 0.688-0.785).

CONCLUSIONS

Community-based interventions have potential to reduce emergency department visits in patients with multimorbidity. Identification of specific successful components of interventions was challenging given the overlaps between interventions. Policymakers should recognise the importance of community interventions and aim to integrate aspects of these into existing healthcare structures. Future research should investigate the impact of such interventions with broader participant characteristics.

摘要

目的

总结针对多病种患者的基于社区的干预措施对非计划性医疗保健使用的影响。多病种(多种慢性疾病同时存在)的患病率正在迅速上升,影响了全球三分之一的人口。患有多病种的患者有复杂的医疗保健需求,并且非计划性医疗保健使用的频率更高。基于社区的干预措施可以在医院外继续为患者提供护理,但很少有研究探讨这些干预措施对非计划性医疗保健使用的影响。

设计

系统评价。检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsychINFO 和 Cochrane Library 在线数据库。对研究进行了筛选和偏倚风险评估。使用叙述性综合法对数据进行了综合。

设置

基于社区的干预措施。

参与者

患有多病种的患者。

主要观察指标

非计划性医疗保健使用。

结果

纳入了 13 项研究,共纳入 6148 名参与者。所有纳入的研究均来自高收入环境,且研究人群均为老年人。所有研究均将急诊就诊作为其主要结局进行测量。偏倚风险通常较低。大多数社区干预措施具有多方面的特点,重点是教育、症状自我监测和定期随访。有 4 项研究关注改善医疗协调、预先护理计划和姑息治疗。所有 13 项研究均发现干预后急诊就诊次数减少,风险降低范围为 0(95%置信区间:-0.37 至 0.37)至 0.735(95%置信区间:0.688 至 0.785)。

结论

基于社区的干预措施有可能减少多病种患者的急诊就诊次数。由于干预措施之间存在重叠,因此确定干预措施的具体成功因素具有挑战性。决策者应认识到社区干预措施的重要性,并努力将这些措施纳入现有医疗保健结构中。未来的研究应调查此类干预措施对具有更广泛参与者特征的影响。

相似文献

1
The effects of community interventions on unplanned healthcare use in patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review.社区干预对多种疾病患者非计划性医疗保健使用的影响:系统评价。
J R Soc Med. 2024 Jan;117(1):24-35. doi: 10.1177/01410768231186224. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
2
Depression and unplanned secondary healthcare use in patients with multimorbidity: A systematic review.共病患者的抑郁和非计划性二级医疗保健使用:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266605. eCollection 2022.
3
Reducing unplanned hospital admissions from care homes: a systematic review.减少养老院的非计划性住院:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(18):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KLPW6338.
4
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.在初级保健和社区环境中改善多种疾病患者结局的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 15;1(1):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub4.
5
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.改善基层医疗和社区环境中患有多种疾病患者预后的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 14;3(3):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
School-based self-management interventions for asthma in children and adolescents: a mixed methods systematic review.针对儿童和青少年哮喘的校本自我管理干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 28;1(1):CD011651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011651.pub2.
8
Managing patients with multimorbidity: systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings.管理多病共存患者:初级保健和社区环境中干预措施的系统评价。
BMJ. 2012 Sep 3;345:e5205. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5205.
9
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.改善基层医疗和社区环境中患有多种疾病患者治疗效果的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18(4):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub2.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Contributions of Specialized Nurses to Medication Management for Older People in Home Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review.专科护士对居家护理中老年人用药管理的贡献:一项混合方法的系统评价
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Feb 13;18:445-470. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S508170. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of early readmission on subsequent hospital admissions within 1 year in patients with heart failure: A retrospective cohort study.心力衰竭患者早期再入院对1年内随后住院情况的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 14;104(7):e41567. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041567.
3
A long way from Frome: improving connections between patients, local services and communities to reduce emergency admissions.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing the pressures of outpatient care: the potential role of patient-reported outcomes.减轻门诊护理压力:患者报告结局的潜在作用。
J R Soc Med. 2023 Feb;116(2):44-64. doi: 10.1177/01410768231152222. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
2
Effects of goal-oriented care for adults with multimorbidity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.多病症成年人目标导向护理的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Jun;28(3):371-381. doi: 10.1111/jep.13674. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
从弗罗姆出发:改善患者、当地服务和社区之间的联系,以减少急诊入院。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 17;25(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02557-4.
4
Non-emergency department (ED) interventions to reduce ED utilization: a scoping review.非急诊部门(ED)干预措施以减少 ED 利用:范围综述。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01028-4.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Multimorbidity patterns and their relationship to mortality in the US older adult population.美国老年人群体中的多种疾病模式及其与死亡率的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 20;16(1):e0245053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245053. eCollection 2021.
5
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.在初级保健和社区环境中改善多种疾病患者结局的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 15;1(1):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub4.
6
Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Multidisciplinary Intervention vs Usual Care on Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adults in an Accountable Care Organization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.护士主导的多学科干预与常规护理对问责制医疗组织中脆弱老年人的预先护理计划的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):361-369. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5950.
7
Feasibility of a Home-Based Palliative Care Intervention for Elderly Multimorbid Survivors of Critical Illness.居家姑息治疗干预对重症疾病老年多器官幸存者的可行性研究。
Am J Crit Care. 2021 Jan 1;30(1):e12-e31. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2021117.
8
Impact of multimorbidity on healthcare costs and utilisation: a systematic review of the UK literature.多病症对医疗保健成本和利用的影响:英国文献的系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec 28;71(702):e39-e46. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X713897. Print 2021 Jan.
9
What works in managing complex conditions in older people in primary and community care? A state-of-the-art review.在初级保健和社区护理中管理老年人复杂疾病的有效方法有哪些?最新综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):1915-1927. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13085. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
10
Impact of the CareWell integrated care model for older patients with multimorbidity: a quasi-experimental controlled study in the Basque Country.《关爱通整合照护模式对多病共存老年患者的影响:巴斯克地区的准实验对照研究》。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 3;20(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05473-2.